A research design proposal combining case study and multi-agent simulation for analyzing complex and emergent processes in Information Systems

Johann Habib, François de Corbière
{"title":"A research design proposal combining case study and multi-agent simulation for analyzing complex and emergent processes in Information Systems","authors":"Johann Habib, François de Corbière","doi":"10.9876/sim.v23i3.825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulation methods are more and more used in organization sciences. However, few researches in management of information systems integrate this methodological approach. In this paper, we first highlight simulation relevance to analyze complex and emergent phenomena. Then, the value of a research design combining two methodological approaches, case study and multi-agent simulation, is argued. Two simulation models are used to illustrate the contribution of combining both the methods, especially for improving validity of the simulation results. Qualitative foundations of the simulation improve the validity of the model built as well as they allow a better interpretation of simulation results. In return, simulation allows formulating new questions more theoretical and prospective, and also reinforces the theoretical generalization of results. Nevertheless this methodological combination leads to review the positioning of simulation in the research design. The simulation doesn’t hold a central place in the scientific knowledge building but more a complementary place, allow to surpass the case study and to renew the researcher questions.","PeriodicalId":220138,"journal":{"name":"French Journal of Management Information Systems","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Journal of Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9876/sim.v23i3.825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation methods are more and more used in organization sciences. However, few researches in management of information systems integrate this methodological approach. In this paper, we first highlight simulation relevance to analyze complex and emergent phenomena. Then, the value of a research design combining two methodological approaches, case study and multi-agent simulation, is argued. Two simulation models are used to illustrate the contribution of combining both the methods, especially for improving validity of the simulation results. Qualitative foundations of the simulation improve the validity of the model built as well as they allow a better interpretation of simulation results. In return, simulation allows formulating new questions more theoretical and prospective, and also reinforces the theoretical generalization of results. Nevertheless this methodological combination leads to review the positioning of simulation in the research design. The simulation doesn’t hold a central place in the scientific knowledge building but more a complementary place, allow to surpass the case study and to renew the researcher questions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合案例研究和多智能体模拟,分析信息系统中复杂和紧急过程的研究设计方案
仿真方法在组织科学中的应用越来越广泛。然而,很少有信息系统管理方面的研究整合了这种方法。在本文中,我们首先强调仿真与分析复杂和紧急现象的相关性。然后,讨论了案例研究和多智能体仿真两种方法相结合的研究设计的价值。用两个仿真模型来说明两种方法结合的贡献,特别是对提高仿真结果的有效性。仿真的定性基础提高了所建模型的有效性,并且可以更好地解释仿真结果。反过来,模拟允许制定新的问题更具理论性和前瞻性,也加强了结果的理论概括。然而,这种方法的结合导致了对研究设计中模拟的定位的回顾。模拟在科学知识建设中并不占据中心位置,而是一个补充位置,允许超越案例研究并更新研究人员的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pros and Cons of IoT Use: What can they tell us with respect to Business Model Change? Business Model Research in the Information Systems Literature: A Review and a Research Agenda Open Source Companies’ Absorptive Capacity: from Business Model to Business Intention The Crowdfunding Paradox: the Underuse of Crowd in the Individual Investment Decision-Making Factory The symbolic interpretation of enterprise social networks as a brake on their adoption within one French banking group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1