A RMSA Algorithm Resilient to Multiple Node Failures on Elastic Optical Networks

Fábio Barbosa, A. Sousa, A. Agra, K. Walkowiak, Róża Goścień
{"title":"A RMSA Algorithm Resilient to Multiple Node Failures on Elastic Optical Networks","authors":"Fábio Barbosa, A. Sousa, A. Agra, K. Walkowiak, Róża Goścień","doi":"10.1109/RNDM48015.2019.8949141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An Elastic Optical Network (EON) provides a lot of flexibility on the way an optical network supports the demands of multiple services. This flexibility is given by the Routing, Modulation and Spectrum Assignment (RMSA) algorithm whose primary goal is to use the spectrum resources of the network in an efficient way. Recently, large-scale failures are becoming a concern and one source of such failures is malicious human activities. In terrorist attacks, although node shutdowns are harder to realize than link cuts, they are the most rewarding in the attackers' perspective since the shutdown of one node also shuts down all its connected links. In order to obtain a RMSA algorithm resilient to multiple node failures, we propose the use of a path disaster availability metric which measures the probability of each path not being affected by a multiple node failure. We present computational results considering a mix of unicast and anycast services in 3 well-known topologies. We assess the trade-off between spectrum usage efficiency and resilience to multiple node failures of our proposal against other previous known algorithms. The results show that the RMSA decision is always better when the disaster path availability metric is used. Moreover, the best way to use the path disaster availability metric in the RMSA decision depends on the traffic load of the EON.","PeriodicalId":120852,"journal":{"name":"2019 11th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 11th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RNDM48015.2019.8949141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An Elastic Optical Network (EON) provides a lot of flexibility on the way an optical network supports the demands of multiple services. This flexibility is given by the Routing, Modulation and Spectrum Assignment (RMSA) algorithm whose primary goal is to use the spectrum resources of the network in an efficient way. Recently, large-scale failures are becoming a concern and one source of such failures is malicious human activities. In terrorist attacks, although node shutdowns are harder to realize than link cuts, they are the most rewarding in the attackers' perspective since the shutdown of one node also shuts down all its connected links. In order to obtain a RMSA algorithm resilient to multiple node failures, we propose the use of a path disaster availability metric which measures the probability of each path not being affected by a multiple node failure. We present computational results considering a mix of unicast and anycast services in 3 well-known topologies. We assess the trade-off between spectrum usage efficiency and resilience to multiple node failures of our proposal against other previous known algorithms. The results show that the RMSA decision is always better when the disaster path availability metric is used. Moreover, the best way to use the path disaster availability metric in the RMSA decision depends on the traffic load of the EON.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弹性光网络多节点故障弹性RMSA算法
弹性光网络(EON)为光网络支持多种业务需求的方式提供了很大的灵活性。这种灵活性是由路由、调制和频谱分配(RMSA)算法提供的,其主要目标是有效地利用网络的频谱资源。最近,大规模故障正成为人们关注的问题,而此类故障的一个来源是恶意的人类活动。在恐怖袭击中,虽然节点关闭比链路切断更难实现,但从攻击者的角度来看,节点关闭是最有回报的,因为一个节点的关闭也会关闭所有连接的链路。为了获得对多节点故障具有弹性的RMSA算法,我们提出使用路径灾难可用性度量,该度量用于测量每条路径不受多节点故障影响的概率。我们给出了在3种已知拓扑中考虑单播和任意播服务混合的计算结果。我们评估了频谱使用效率和多节点故障弹性之间的权衡,我们的提议相对于其他已知算法。结果表明,当使用灾难路径可用性度量时,RMSA决策总是更好。此外,在RMSA决策中使用路径灾难可用性度量的最佳方法取决于EON的流量负载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Efficient Dynamic Routing in Spectrally-Spatially Flexible Optical Networks Resilient Wheel-Based Optical Access Network Architecture FRADIR-II: An Improved Framework for Disaster Resilience Modeling Technological Interdependency in IoT - A Multidimensional and Multilayer Network Model for Smart Environments A RMSA Algorithm Resilient to Multiple Node Failures on Elastic Optical Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1