Can We Use EDS to Determine Fluorine Contamination Level on A Normal Al Bondpad?

H. Younan
{"title":"Can We Use EDS to Determine Fluorine Contamination Level on A Normal Al Bondpad?","authors":"H. Younan","doi":"10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN this paper, the differences between EDS and AES are discussed. One can full understand what limitation of EDS technique is and why AES is better tool to determine F contamination on a normal Al bondpad. During application we cannot directly compare EDS result to AES result as EDS is a bulk analysis technique, while AES is surface analysis technique. For surface contamination analysis, a practice rule should be followed: “EDS clean is not clean” and “Auger clean is clean”. It is fully recommended for us to use AES to analyse and monitor surface F contamination level on a normal Al bondpad.","PeriodicalId":382811,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

IN this paper, the differences between EDS and AES are discussed. One can full understand what limitation of EDS technique is and why AES is better tool to determine F contamination on a normal Al bondpad. During application we cannot directly compare EDS result to AES result as EDS is a bulk analysis technique, while AES is surface analysis technique. For surface contamination analysis, a practice rule should be followed: “EDS clean is not clean” and “Auger clean is clean”. It is fully recommended for us to use AES to analyse and monitor surface F contamination level on a normal Al bondpad.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们能用能谱仪测定正常铝键板上的氟污染水平吗?
本文讨论了能谱法与AES法的区别。人们可以充分理解EDS技术的局限性,以及为什么AES是确定普通铝键合板上F污染的更好工具。在应用过程中,由于EDS是一种体分析技术,而AES是一种表面分析技术,我们不能直接将EDS结果与AES结果进行比较。对于表面污染分析,应遵循一个实践规则:“EDS清洁不清洁”和“俄钻清洁清洁”。我们完全推荐使用AES来分析和监测正常铝键板表面F污染水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Faster Localization of Logic Soft Failures Using a Combination of Scan Diagnosis at Reduced VDD and LADA Case Study and Application on Failure Analysis for Power Device Failure Analysis Techniques for 3D Packages Impact of Wire RC Based on High Voltage SCAN Failure Analysis in 10nm Process Contactless Fault Isolation of Ultra Low k Dielectrics in Soft Breakdown Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1