Administrative Chief Residents - How Are They Chosen and Does It Matter?

A. Weiss, Damini Tandon, Katherine C. Lee, Bindupriya Chandrasekaran, N. Lopez, S. Ramamoorthy, V. Malcarne, S. Blair
{"title":"Administrative Chief Residents - How Are They Chosen and Does It Matter?","authors":"A. Weiss, Damini Tandon, Katherine C. Lee, Bindupriya Chandrasekaran, N. Lopez, S. Ramamoorthy, V. Malcarne, S. Blair","doi":"10.17795/MINSURGERY-34764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is no literature on the administrative chief resident (ACR) in surgery or disparities of this leadership position. Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the rates of perceived female and minority leadership at the resident level. Patients and Methods: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a pilot survey was sent to surgical residents and faculty at a single university surgical program. The survey was revised based on small group feedback and a specialist in study design. It was then sent to all US surgical residents and program directors, and analyzed using Survey Monkey. Results: There was a 10% resident response rate, 22% program director, most from a program with 50% female residents. 71% report no clear ACR policy, 64% believe the position appointed. Half report less than 25% female ACRs, 54% zero minority ACRs. Program directors reported more female ACRs, but similar lack of selection policy. 54% believe ACR receives a stipend. 31% report more than 75% went into academics. Conclusions: Although most surgical programs train 50% female residents, residents perceive that fewer than 25% ACRs are female. ACRs in the United States are often receiving a stipend and going into academic practice. Programs should keep diversity in mind in appointing ACR.","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/MINSURGERY-34764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no literature on the administrative chief resident (ACR) in surgery or disparities of this leadership position. Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the rates of perceived female and minority leadership at the resident level. Patients and Methods: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a pilot survey was sent to surgical residents and faculty at a single university surgical program. The survey was revised based on small group feedback and a specialist in study design. It was then sent to all US surgical residents and program directors, and analyzed using Survey Monkey. Results: There was a 10% resident response rate, 22% program director, most from a program with 50% female residents. 71% report no clear ACR policy, 64% believe the position appointed. Half report less than 25% female ACRs, 54% zero minority ACRs. Program directors reported more female ACRs, but similar lack of selection policy. 54% believe ACR receives a stipend. 31% report more than 75% went into academics. Conclusions: Although most surgical programs train 50% female residents, residents perceive that fewer than 25% ACRs are female. ACRs in the United States are often receiving a stipend and going into academic practice. Programs should keep diversity in mind in appointing ACR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
▽行政总住院医师=行政总住院医师是如何选出的?
背景:目前没有关于外科行政总住院医师(ACR)的文献或这一领导职位的差异。目的:本研究的目的是检查在住院医师水平感知的女性和少数民族领导率。患者和方法:在机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,向一所大学外科项目的外科住院医师和教师发送了一份试点调查。调查是根据小组反馈和研究设计专家的意见进行修改的。然后将其发送给所有美国外科住院医师和项目主任,并使用Survey Monkey进行分析。结果:住院医师的回复率为10%,项目主管的回复率为22%,大多数来自女性住院医师占50%的项目。71%的人表示没有明确的ACR政策,64%的人认为该职位是任命的。半数报告女性acr低于25%,54%报告少数族裔acr为零。项目主管报告说,女性acr更多,但同样缺乏选拔政策。54%的人认为ACR有津贴。31%的人表示,超过75%的人进入了学术界。结论:虽然大多数外科项目培训50%的女性住院医师,但住院医师认为女性acr不到25%。在美国,acr通常会获得津贴并进入学术实践。各项目在任命ACR时应考虑到多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Key Methods to Increase the Success Rate of Endoscopic Repair of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Marginal Ulcer After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Case Report and Review of Literature Meshoma, a Rare Complication of Abdomen and Hernia Repair-A Case Report Successful Removal of a Pulmonary Foreign Body Using C-Arm-Guided Flexible Bronchoscopy from Distal Airways of a Seven-Year-Old Boy: A Case Report Rectal Indomethacin Versus Rectal Diclofenac Sodium for Reducing Pain Associated with Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1