A simulation-based comparison of maximum entropy and copula methods for capturing non-linear probability dependence

E. Salimi, A. Abbas
{"title":"A simulation-based comparison of maximum entropy and copula methods for capturing non-linear probability dependence","authors":"E. Salimi, A. Abbas","doi":"10.1109/WSC.2016.7822112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modeling of complex service systems entails capturing many sub-components of the system, and the dependencies that exist among them in the form of a joint probability distribution. Two common methods for constructing joint probability distributions from experts using partial information include maximum entropy methods and copula methods. In this paper we explore the performance of these methods in capturing the dependence between random variables using correlation coefficients and lower-order pairwise assessments. We focus on the case of discrete random variables, and compare the performance of these methods using a Monte Carlo simulation when the variables exhibit both independence and non-linear dependence structures. We show that the maximum entropy method with correlation coefficients and the Gaussian copula method perform similarly, while the maximum entropy method with pairwise assessments performs better particularly when the variables exhibit non-linear dependence.","PeriodicalId":367269,"journal":{"name":"2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2016.7822112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The modeling of complex service systems entails capturing many sub-components of the system, and the dependencies that exist among them in the form of a joint probability distribution. Two common methods for constructing joint probability distributions from experts using partial information include maximum entropy methods and copula methods. In this paper we explore the performance of these methods in capturing the dependence between random variables using correlation coefficients and lower-order pairwise assessments. We focus on the case of discrete random variables, and compare the performance of these methods using a Monte Carlo simulation when the variables exhibit both independence and non-linear dependence structures. We show that the maximum entropy method with correlation coefficients and the Gaussian copula method perform similarly, while the maximum entropy method with pairwise assessments performs better particularly when the variables exhibit non-linear dependence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于仿真的最大熵和copula方法的比较,用于捕获非线性概率依赖关系
复杂服务系统的建模需要捕获系统的许多子组件,以及它们之间以联合概率分布的形式存在的依赖关系。利用部分信息构造专家联合概率分布的两种常用方法包括最大熵法和copula法。在本文中,我们探讨了这些方法在使用相关系数和低阶成对评估来捕获随机变量之间的相关性方面的性能。我们将重点放在离散随机变量的情况下,并使用蒙特卡罗模拟比较这些方法在变量表现出独立和非线性依赖结构时的性能。我们表明,具有相关系数的最大熵方法和高斯copula方法表现相似,而具有两两评估的最大熵方法表现更好,特别是当变量表现出非线性依赖时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enriching Simheuristics with Petri net models: Potential applications to logistics and supply chain management A ship block logistics support system based on the shipyard simulation framework Modeling & simulation's role as a service to military and homeland security decision makers Multiple comparisons with a standard using false discovery rates Lean design and analysis of a milk-run delivery system: Case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1