Danish cannabis policy in practice: the closing of ‘Pusher Street’ and the cannabis market in Copenhagen

Vibeke Asmussen
{"title":"Danish cannabis policy in practice: the closing of ‘Pusher Street’ and the cannabis market in Copenhagen","authors":"Vibeke Asmussen","doi":"10.4324/9781315382869-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last three or four years, Danish drug policy has been reversed from liberal to more repressive, especially in 2003, when the Danish liberal±conservative government that had been in oce since 2001 launched their ocial policy on drugs, The Fight Against Drugs: action plan against drug misuse. This action plan emphasised a more repressive drug policy in which priority was given to law enforcement, although an expansion of treatment facilities and prevention initiatives was also planned. The overall aim was to tighten the laws on drug dealing and drug use and to increase the penalties for these o€ences. The plan explicitly stated that the policy was to take a zero tolerance approach towards any kind of drug dealing. The fact that the liberal±conservative wing of the Danish parliament holds this attitude is not new. Storgaard argues that the di€erent drug control policies of this wing (which do not di€erentiate between users and dealers, or between `hard' and `soft' drugs) and the centre-left (which do) have been a battle®eld in Danish drug policy for the past 30 years. The centre-left wing, headed by the Social Democratic Party, dominated Danish drug policy until 2001, when the present liberal±conservative government came into oce. Although the Social Democratic Party did tighten some aspects of their drug policy, whether they would have continued to do so to the extent that the liberal±conservatives subsequently did is a matter for speculation. One aspect of the present government's more repressive drug policy was to crack down on cannabis dealing as well as cannabis use. The focus of this chapter is the closing of `Pusher Street', one of the most well-","PeriodicalId":366329,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in society","volume":"250 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315382869-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

During the last three or four years, Danish drug policy has been reversed from liberal to more repressive, especially in 2003, when the Danish liberal±conservative government that had been in oce since 2001 launched their ocial policy on drugs, The Fight Against Drugs: action plan against drug misuse. This action plan emphasised a more repressive drug policy in which priority was given to law enforcement, although an expansion of treatment facilities and prevention initiatives was also planned. The overall aim was to tighten the laws on drug dealing and drug use and to increase the penalties for these o€ences. The plan explicitly stated that the policy was to take a zero tolerance approach towards any kind of drug dealing. The fact that the liberal±conservative wing of the Danish parliament holds this attitude is not new. Storgaard argues that the di€erent drug control policies of this wing (which do not di€erentiate between users and dealers, or between `hard' and `soft' drugs) and the centre-left (which do) have been a battle®eld in Danish drug policy for the past 30 years. The centre-left wing, headed by the Social Democratic Party, dominated Danish drug policy until 2001, when the present liberal±conservative government came into oce. Although the Social Democratic Party did tighten some aspects of their drug policy, whether they would have continued to do so to the extent that the liberal±conservatives subsequently did is a matter for speculation. One aspect of the present government's more repressive drug policy was to crack down on cannabis dealing as well as cannabis use. The focus of this chapter is the closing of `Pusher Street', one of the most well-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦大麻政策的实践:关闭哥本哈根的“Pusher街”和大麻市场
在过去的三四年里,丹麦的毒品政策从自由转向了更加严厉,特别是在2003年,自2001年以来一直执政的丹麦自由和保守政府推出了他们的毒品财政政策,即反对毒品滥用的行动计划。这项行动计划强调了一项更加严厉的毒品政策,其中优先考虑执法,尽管也计划扩大治疗设施和预防措施。总的目标是加强有关毒品交易和吸毒的法律,并加大对这些行为的惩罚力度。该计划明确表示,政策是对任何形式的毒品交易采取零容忍态度。丹麦议会的自由派和保守派持这种态度并不是什么新鲜事。Storgaard认为,这一派(不区分使用者和经销商,也不区分“硬”和“软”毒品)和中左翼(区分“硬”和“软”毒品)的不同毒品管制政策,在过去30年里一直是丹麦毒品政策的战场。以社会民主党(Social Democratic Party)为首的中左翼主导了丹麦的毒品政策,直到2001年现任自由和保守政府上台。虽然社会民主党确实收紧了毒品政策的某些方面,但他们是否会继续这样做,直到自由派和保守派后来所做的那样,这是一个值得猜测的问题。现任政府更加严厉的毒品政策的一个方面是打击大麻交易和大麻的使用。本章的重点是“推动者街”的关闭,这是最受欢迎的之一
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The methadone game: control strategies and responses Danish cannabis policy in practice: the closing of ‘Pusher Street’ and the cannabis market in Copenhagen Perceptions of drugs and drug users in Portugal How to camouflage ethical questions in addiction research Ephedra for fun, performance and losing weight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1