Reflective practice and the element of surprise in technology enhanced learning

Philippa Smith
{"title":"Reflective practice and the element of surprise in technology enhanced learning","authors":"Philippa Smith","doi":"10.24135/pjtel.v4i1.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a concept paper which draws attention to the element of ‘surprise’ when it comes to educators’ self-reflections  and which I apply to my own experience of implementing new forms of pedagogy in relation to technology and enhanced learning. The idea that the experience of  “surprise” or “encounter with strangeness” leads us to a conversation with the ‘other’, that in turn forces a change of habits, is an essential part of self-reflective practice according to Pollard (2008:402). In citing Charles Sanders Peirce (1955) and his notion that “experience is not personally owned but rather a conversation between the self and that which is not-yet known”, Pollard suggests that this can result in “different techniques of teaching, which are then open to further interpretation” (2008:403). \nMy own experience involving an element of surprise occurred in  2021 when I tasked a class of  my  second-year undergraduate students with the assignment of creating a digital artefact of their choice. My objective was to help students develop their digital skills and to become more aware of the multiple modes of communication available to them. The artefacts could be  a short 5 minute YouTube video, a podcast, a pecha kucha presentation, or an online game, and the students were asked to  communicate a message on a topic that was important to them.  Examples I suggested were climate change, sustainability, the #metoo or #BlackLivesMatters movements, or the Covid-19 pandemic. \nHowever, two unexpected outcomes occurred where I encountered ‘surprise’ (Pollard, 2008) which led me to a conversation with the ‘other’ – sometimes referred to as a “strange intruder” (Peirce, 1960: 38). First, rather than highlighting world problems or social issues on a large scale, many of the students chose to relate their own, very personally-revealing stories dealing with topics such as depression, anxiety, suicide, health issues and toxic relationships. Second, in providing feedback on their experience of this assignment, several students further surprised me by stating that while they were unsure about creating a digital artefact – something they had not done previously. Telling their own stories in a creative way, particularly when they learned they did not need to present it to the rest of the class, they found to be cathartic and personally beneficial.  \nAs a result of being surprised, and in conversation with  this “strange intruder” that challenged my teaching, I realised that the response to this assignment  was illustrative to me and to other educators that technology-enhanced learning goes far beyond the technology in what it can achieve, and in meeting the needs of students.  Noting this experience assists me in understanding how students themselves can be instrumental and collaborative in the on-going development of a paper. It also reinforces that self-reflection should always be an essential practice for educators in developing their teaching practice, no matter their level of experience. \nReferences \n  \nPeirce, C.S. (1955). Philosophical writings of C.S. Peirce. New York:, Dover Publications. \nPollard, V. (2008). Ethics and reflective practice: continuing the conversation, Reflective Practice, 9:4, 399-407, DOI: 10.1080/14623940802431788","PeriodicalId":384031,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/pjtel.v4i1.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a concept paper which draws attention to the element of ‘surprise’ when it comes to educators’ self-reflections  and which I apply to my own experience of implementing new forms of pedagogy in relation to technology and enhanced learning. The idea that the experience of  “surprise” or “encounter with strangeness” leads us to a conversation with the ‘other’, that in turn forces a change of habits, is an essential part of self-reflective practice according to Pollard (2008:402). In citing Charles Sanders Peirce (1955) and his notion that “experience is not personally owned but rather a conversation between the self and that which is not-yet known”, Pollard suggests that this can result in “different techniques of teaching, which are then open to further interpretation” (2008:403). My own experience involving an element of surprise occurred in  2021 when I tasked a class of  my  second-year undergraduate students with the assignment of creating a digital artefact of their choice. My objective was to help students develop their digital skills and to become more aware of the multiple modes of communication available to them. The artefacts could be  a short 5 minute YouTube video, a podcast, a pecha kucha presentation, or an online game, and the students were asked to  communicate a message on a topic that was important to them.  Examples I suggested were climate change, sustainability, the #metoo or #BlackLivesMatters movements, or the Covid-19 pandemic. However, two unexpected outcomes occurred where I encountered ‘surprise’ (Pollard, 2008) which led me to a conversation with the ‘other’ – sometimes referred to as a “strange intruder” (Peirce, 1960: 38). First, rather than highlighting world problems or social issues on a large scale, many of the students chose to relate their own, very personally-revealing stories dealing with topics such as depression, anxiety, suicide, health issues and toxic relationships. Second, in providing feedback on their experience of this assignment, several students further surprised me by stating that while they were unsure about creating a digital artefact – something they had not done previously. Telling their own stories in a creative way, particularly when they learned they did not need to present it to the rest of the class, they found to be cathartic and personally beneficial.  As a result of being surprised, and in conversation with  this “strange intruder” that challenged my teaching, I realised that the response to this assignment  was illustrative to me and to other educators that technology-enhanced learning goes far beyond the technology in what it can achieve, and in meeting the needs of students.  Noting this experience assists me in understanding how students themselves can be instrumental and collaborative in the on-going development of a paper. It also reinforces that self-reflection should always be an essential practice for educators in developing their teaching practice, no matter their level of experience. References   Peirce, C.S. (1955). Philosophical writings of C.S. Peirce. New York:, Dover Publications. Pollard, V. (2008). Ethics and reflective practice: continuing the conversation, Reflective Practice, 9:4, 399-407, DOI: 10.1080/14623940802431788
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反思性实践和技术中的惊喜元素促进了学习
这是一篇概念论文,当涉及到教育者的自我反思时,它引起了人们对“惊喜”元素的关注,我将其应用于我自己在实施与技术和强化学习相关的新形式教学法的经验中。根据Pollard(2008:402)的观点,“惊奇”或“遇到陌生”的经历会引导我们与“他者”进行对话,从而迫使我们改变习惯,这是自我反思实践的重要组成部分。波拉德引用查尔斯•桑德斯•皮尔斯(Charles Sanders Peirce, 1955)和他的观点“经验不是个人拥有的,而是自我与未知事物之间的对话”,他认为这可能导致“不同的教学技术,然后对其进行进一步的解释”(2008:403)。我自己的意外经历发生在2021年,当时我给本科生二年级的一个班级布置了一项任务,让他们自己选择创建一个数字人工制品。我的目标是帮助学生发展他们的数字技能,并更加了解他们可以使用的多种交流模式。这些人工制品可以是一段5分钟的YouTube视频、播客、一段pecha kucha演示或一款在线游戏,学生们被要求就一个对他们很重要的话题进行交流。我建议的例子包括气候变化、可持续发展、#metoo或#黑人的生命也很重要运动,或2019冠状病毒病大流行。然而,两个意想不到的结果发生了,我遇到了“惊喜”(Pollard, 2008),这导致我与“他者”——有时被称为“奇怪的入侵者”(Peirce, 1960: 38)的对话。首先,许多学生选择讲述自己的故事,而不是大规模地突出世界问题或社会问题,这些故事涉及抑郁、焦虑、自杀、健康问题和有毒的人际关系等话题。其次,在提供他们对这次作业的经验反馈时,有几个学生进一步让我感到惊讶,他们说,虽然他们不确定是否要创建一个数字人工制品——这是他们以前没有做过的事情。以一种创造性的方式讲述自己的故事,特别是当他们知道自己不需要向班上其他同学讲述时,他们发现这是一种宣泄,对个人有益。在与这个挑战我教学的“奇怪的入侵者”的交谈中,我感到惊讶,我意识到对这个任务的反应对我和其他教育工作者来说都是一个说明,即技术增强的学习在实现什么以及满足学生的需求方面远远超出了技术。注意到这一经历有助于我理解学生自己如何在论文的持续发展中发挥作用和协作作用。它还强调,无论教育工作者的经验水平如何,自我反思都应该始终是他们发展教学实践的基本实践。参考文献皮尔斯,C.S.(1955)。皮尔斯的哲学著作。纽约:多佛出版社。波拉德,V.(2008)。伦理和反思实践:继续对话,反思实践,9:4,399-407,DOI: 10.1080/14623940802431788
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Connecting enaction and indigenous epistemologies in technology-enhanced learning Co-designing the first online pharmacy course with the technology-enhanced learning accreditation standards (TELAS) as a reflective tool Generative AI and education ecologies Understanding students’ views on the efficacy of video technology to promote engagement in higher education. CPA Methodology: educational technological design proposal to solve problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1