Hip Fracture Admissions Among Medicare Beneficiaries 2010-2015 -Rising Hospital Costs and Falling Reimbursements

K. Sundaram, S. Culler, A. Simon, D. Jevsevar, I. Gitajn, Michael J. Schlosser
{"title":"Hip Fracture Admissions Among Medicare Beneficiaries 2010-2015 -Rising Hospital Costs and Falling Reimbursements","authors":"K. Sundaram, S. Culler, A. Simon, D. Jevsevar, I. Gitajn, Michael J. Schlosser","doi":"10.29011/2690-0149.000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This paper reports trends in care and costs associated with hip fracture admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries (MB). Methods: This retrospective study identified 1,558,428 primary hip fracture admissions using the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Files from fiscal years 2010 through fiscal year 2015. Results: The total number of admissions rose from 246,825 to 276,659; however, rate per 1000 MB was 4.96 in 2010 and 4.98 in 2015. In all years, the patients were mostly female, Caucasian, and over age 80. Patient complexity increased as evidenced by greater comorbidity reporting. Most patients received an Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) or partial hip arthroplasty, although there was a slight decline in partial hip arthroplasty and concurrent rise in total hip replacement. The cost per patient rose from $12,363 to $14093 (p<0.0001) despite a fall in average LOS from 5.8 to 5.42 days (p<0.0001) and a fall in in-hospital mortality from 2.6% to 2.2%. Reimbursements fell $1,118 from $10,304 in 2010 to $9,186 in 2015. Conclusions: Average hospital cost per beneficiary rose during our study period while inflation-adjusted reimbursements fell. We found lower average LOS and postop mortality. Rates of AKI on presentation and co-morbid infection have risen. The number of patients receiving THA has risen but the most common treatment is femur repair. Background On July 25, 2016, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) proposed a new model that expands bundled payments to include Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) [1-2]. This progression theoretically shifts Medicare payments from quantity to quality by creating strong incentives for hospitals to deliver better care at a lower cost [3-4]. An estimated 300,000 Medicare beneficiaries suffer a hip fracture per year [5]. In 2014, an average of 5.8 beneficiaries per 1,000 suffered a hip fracture [6]. The primary objective of this study is to report on trends associated with MBs admitted to US hospitals with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture from fiscal years 2010 through fiscal year 2015. We report outcomes among patients receiving Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Partial Hip Arthroplasty (PH), femur repair, and non-operative care. We predicted higher prevalence of baseline comorbidities, higher costs, and lower reimbursements due to national policies favoring cost settings in the setting of an increasingly older US population. Citation: Sundaram K, Culler S, Simon A, Jevsevar DS, Gitajn IL, et al. (2018) Hip Fracture Admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries 2010-2015-Rising hospital costs and falling reimbursements. Int J Musculoskelet Disord: IJMD-107 DOI: 10.29011/ IJMD-107. 000007 2 Volume 2018; Issue 02 Methods Data Source Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services maintains a database called Med PAR that contains all submitted claims for services provided to MBs. We obtained a data set from this database that spanned from 2010 to 2015. Study Population Selection 100% of Medicare Part A and C claims were included. During the study period CMS required claims for every hospitalization ensuring there were no missing claims from part C. Individuals under age 65 may be eligible for Medicare due to disabilities. After careful consideration, we decided to include this population based on prior literature that demonstrated that most patients 40-50 years share a common mechanism with patients over 65-osteoporotic fragility fractures with a fall as an inciting event [7]. Furthermore, prior work from the Kaiser-Family foundation found that a similar proportion of MBs under-65 versus over-65 have 5 or more medical conditions (31% versus 28% percent) suggesting a similar burden of comorbid disease [8]. Patients under 65 eligible for Medicare due to end-stage renal disease were included due to constraints of our data set but prior research suggests they constitute less than 1% of the total Medicare Population [9-10]. The Med Par dataset includes basic demographic information, up to 25 diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes with Present on Admission (POA) flags, primary procedure code, up to 24 additional ICD-9CM procedures codes, LOS in days, discharge status (discharge disposition or site), total charges, and total reimbursement from the Medicare program. We identified patients using ICD-9 codes after careful consideration of prior literature. Data support the use of “fracture of the neck of Femur” relative to chart review (PPV=0.85-0.93) [11-14]. While “pathological fractures” most commonly refer to osteoporotic fragility fractures some clinicians may use the code for patients with metastatic disease. Prior studies have shown a very low rate of metastasis related oncologic fracture in the Medicare population (0.3 patients per 1,000 MB) and the risk of false negatives when excluding “pathologic fracture”, we elected to use ICD-9 code 733.14 for pathological fracture of the neck of the femur [15-16]. Codes of for atypical femur fractures had low sensitivity for extra-capsular fractures and rates of midshaft and distal femur fractures are low in an elderly population, so we included the ICD-9 code for pathological fracture of other specified part of the femur. Ultimately we searched for patients who had any of the following 3 codes in any of the diagnostic positions in the database. Fracture of the neck of Femur (ICD-9 Code 820) • Pathologic fracture of neck of femur (ICD-9 code 733.14) • Pathologic fracture of other specified part of femur (ICD-9 • 733.15) A total of 1,558,428 Medicare beneficiaries were in the final study population. The observation period for diagnoses for each patient began on admission and ended on discharge. Operational Definitions and Analysis Medicare Reimbursement Was defined strictly as the Medicare payment for each hospitalization. This does not include any out-of-pocket payments by MBs or secondary payers. The cost of each hospitalization was estimated by multiplying total billed charges by the hospital-level cost-to-charge ratio obtained from the appropriate hospital’s Annual Medicare Cost Report (or the most recent settled cost report of the hospital). Length-of-Stay (LOS) was defined as the whole number of days from admission to discharge. Our treatment groups included total-hip arthroplasty (THA), Partial Hip Arthroplasty (PHA), femur repair, and non-operative treatment. Claims were evaluated using both Part A and Part C. Statistical Analysis A two sided chi-square test assessed the presence or absence statistically of significant univariate trends over the study period. Subsequent one-sided analyses tested the presence or absence of a trend with a positively skewed tail or a negatively skewed tail. Trends were statistically different if the P value was less than or equal to 0.01. Organizational variables analyzed include estimated hospital costs, Medicare reimbursements, length of stay, and discharge status. Clinical variables included type of operative treatment, adverse events, and mortality. All analyses were performed with SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Approval and Funding Our study received evaluation and approval from the Dartmouth-Hitchcock IRB as an exempt study. Funding did not play a role in our study. Results The final study population included a total of 1,558,428 Medicare beneficiaries over 6 years. (Figure 1) describes the number of beneficiaries treated by year. The total number of MBs experiencing a primary hip fracture has increased from 246,825 in FY-2010 to 276,659 in FY-2015. (Figure 1), Compounded Annual Growth Rate=2.8%). The rate of fractures per 1000 MB was 4.96 in 2010 versus 4.98 in 2015. (Figure 2) Citation: Sundaram K, Culler S, Simon A, Jevsevar DS, Gitajn IL, et al. (2018) Hip Fracture Admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries 2010-2015-Rising hospital costs and falling reimbursements. Int J Musculoskelet Disord: IJMD-107 DOI: 10.29011/ IJMD-107. 000007 3 Volume 2018; Issue 02 Figure 1: Absolute Annual Rate of Hip Fractures among Medicare Beneficiaries. Figure 2: Annual Rate of Hip Fractures per 1,000 Medicare Beneficiaries. In 2015, women constituted 70.5% of our population. 64.2% of patients had reached age 80 or greater and Caucasians represented 91.4% of the population. Each of these variables experienced a statistically significant fall (p≤0.001, Table 1); however, none of the listed demographic changes declined by more than 2%. Variable 2010a 2011a 2012a 2013a 2014a 2015a p-Valueb","PeriodicalId":296965,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2690-0149.000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper reports trends in care and costs associated with hip fracture admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries (MB). Methods: This retrospective study identified 1,558,428 primary hip fracture admissions using the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Files from fiscal years 2010 through fiscal year 2015. Results: The total number of admissions rose from 246,825 to 276,659; however, rate per 1000 MB was 4.96 in 2010 and 4.98 in 2015. In all years, the patients were mostly female, Caucasian, and over age 80. Patient complexity increased as evidenced by greater comorbidity reporting. Most patients received an Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) or partial hip arthroplasty, although there was a slight decline in partial hip arthroplasty and concurrent rise in total hip replacement. The cost per patient rose from $12,363 to $14093 (p<0.0001) despite a fall in average LOS from 5.8 to 5.42 days (p<0.0001) and a fall in in-hospital mortality from 2.6% to 2.2%. Reimbursements fell $1,118 from $10,304 in 2010 to $9,186 in 2015. Conclusions: Average hospital cost per beneficiary rose during our study period while inflation-adjusted reimbursements fell. We found lower average LOS and postop mortality. Rates of AKI on presentation and co-morbid infection have risen. The number of patients receiving THA has risen but the most common treatment is femur repair. Background On July 25, 2016, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) proposed a new model that expands bundled payments to include Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) [1-2]. This progression theoretically shifts Medicare payments from quantity to quality by creating strong incentives for hospitals to deliver better care at a lower cost [3-4]. An estimated 300,000 Medicare beneficiaries suffer a hip fracture per year [5]. In 2014, an average of 5.8 beneficiaries per 1,000 suffered a hip fracture [6]. The primary objective of this study is to report on trends associated with MBs admitted to US hospitals with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture from fiscal years 2010 through fiscal year 2015. We report outcomes among patients receiving Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Partial Hip Arthroplasty (PH), femur repair, and non-operative care. We predicted higher prevalence of baseline comorbidities, higher costs, and lower reimbursements due to national policies favoring cost settings in the setting of an increasingly older US population. Citation: Sundaram K, Culler S, Simon A, Jevsevar DS, Gitajn IL, et al. (2018) Hip Fracture Admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries 2010-2015-Rising hospital costs and falling reimbursements. Int J Musculoskelet Disord: IJMD-107 DOI: 10.29011/ IJMD-107. 000007 2 Volume 2018; Issue 02 Methods Data Source Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services maintains a database called Med PAR that contains all submitted claims for services provided to MBs. We obtained a data set from this database that spanned from 2010 to 2015. Study Population Selection 100% of Medicare Part A and C claims were included. During the study period CMS required claims for every hospitalization ensuring there were no missing claims from part C. Individuals under age 65 may be eligible for Medicare due to disabilities. After careful consideration, we decided to include this population based on prior literature that demonstrated that most patients 40-50 years share a common mechanism with patients over 65-osteoporotic fragility fractures with a fall as an inciting event [7]. Furthermore, prior work from the Kaiser-Family foundation found that a similar proportion of MBs under-65 versus over-65 have 5 or more medical conditions (31% versus 28% percent) suggesting a similar burden of comorbid disease [8]. Patients under 65 eligible for Medicare due to end-stage renal disease were included due to constraints of our data set but prior research suggests they constitute less than 1% of the total Medicare Population [9-10]. The Med Par dataset includes basic demographic information, up to 25 diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes with Present on Admission (POA) flags, primary procedure code, up to 24 additional ICD-9CM procedures codes, LOS in days, discharge status (discharge disposition or site), total charges, and total reimbursement from the Medicare program. We identified patients using ICD-9 codes after careful consideration of prior literature. Data support the use of “fracture of the neck of Femur” relative to chart review (PPV=0.85-0.93) [11-14]. While “pathological fractures” most commonly refer to osteoporotic fragility fractures some clinicians may use the code for patients with metastatic disease. Prior studies have shown a very low rate of metastasis related oncologic fracture in the Medicare population (0.3 patients per 1,000 MB) and the risk of false negatives when excluding “pathologic fracture”, we elected to use ICD-9 code 733.14 for pathological fracture of the neck of the femur [15-16]. Codes of for atypical femur fractures had low sensitivity for extra-capsular fractures and rates of midshaft and distal femur fractures are low in an elderly population, so we included the ICD-9 code for pathological fracture of other specified part of the femur. Ultimately we searched for patients who had any of the following 3 codes in any of the diagnostic positions in the database. Fracture of the neck of Femur (ICD-9 Code 820) • Pathologic fracture of neck of femur (ICD-9 code 733.14) • Pathologic fracture of other specified part of femur (ICD-9 • 733.15) A total of 1,558,428 Medicare beneficiaries were in the final study population. The observation period for diagnoses for each patient began on admission and ended on discharge. Operational Definitions and Analysis Medicare Reimbursement Was defined strictly as the Medicare payment for each hospitalization. This does not include any out-of-pocket payments by MBs or secondary payers. The cost of each hospitalization was estimated by multiplying total billed charges by the hospital-level cost-to-charge ratio obtained from the appropriate hospital’s Annual Medicare Cost Report (or the most recent settled cost report of the hospital). Length-of-Stay (LOS) was defined as the whole number of days from admission to discharge. Our treatment groups included total-hip arthroplasty (THA), Partial Hip Arthroplasty (PHA), femur repair, and non-operative treatment. Claims were evaluated using both Part A and Part C. Statistical Analysis A two sided chi-square test assessed the presence or absence statistically of significant univariate trends over the study period. Subsequent one-sided analyses tested the presence or absence of a trend with a positively skewed tail or a negatively skewed tail. Trends were statistically different if the P value was less than or equal to 0.01. Organizational variables analyzed include estimated hospital costs, Medicare reimbursements, length of stay, and discharge status. Clinical variables included type of operative treatment, adverse events, and mortality. All analyses were performed with SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Approval and Funding Our study received evaluation and approval from the Dartmouth-Hitchcock IRB as an exempt study. Funding did not play a role in our study. Results The final study population included a total of 1,558,428 Medicare beneficiaries over 6 years. (Figure 1) describes the number of beneficiaries treated by year. The total number of MBs experiencing a primary hip fracture has increased from 246,825 in FY-2010 to 276,659 in FY-2015. (Figure 1), Compounded Annual Growth Rate=2.8%). The rate of fractures per 1000 MB was 4.96 in 2010 versus 4.98 in 2015. (Figure 2) Citation: Sundaram K, Culler S, Simon A, Jevsevar DS, Gitajn IL, et al. (2018) Hip Fracture Admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries 2010-2015-Rising hospital costs and falling reimbursements. Int J Musculoskelet Disord: IJMD-107 DOI: 10.29011/ IJMD-107. 000007 3 Volume 2018; Issue 02 Figure 1: Absolute Annual Rate of Hip Fractures among Medicare Beneficiaries. Figure 2: Annual Rate of Hip Fractures per 1,000 Medicare Beneficiaries. In 2015, women constituted 70.5% of our population. 64.2% of patients had reached age 80 or greater and Caucasians represented 91.4% of the population. Each of these variables experienced a statistically significant fall (p≤0.001, Table 1); however, none of the listed demographic changes declined by more than 2%. Variable 2010a 2011a 2012a 2013a 2014a 2015a p-Valueb
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2010-2015年医疗保险受益人髋部骨折入院-医院费用上升和报销下降
背景:本文报告了医疗保险受益人(MB)髋部骨折入院的护理和费用趋势。方法:本回顾性研究从2010财政年度到2015财政年度,利用医疗保险提供者分析和审查文件,确定了1,558,428例原发性髋部骨折入院。结果:入院总人数由246825人增至276659人;然而,2010年每1000 MB的速率为4.96,2015年为4.98。在所有年份中,患者以女性、白种人和80岁以上为主。更多的合并症报告证明了患者复杂性的增加。大多数患者接受切开复位内固定(ORIF)或部分髋关节置换术,尽管部分髋关节置换术略有下降,同时全髋关节置换术有所上升。每位患者的费用从12,363美元上升到14093美元(p<0.0001),尽管平均LOS从5.8天下降到5.42天(p<0.0001),住院死亡率从2.6%下降到2.2%。报销额从2010年的10304美元下降到2015年的9186美元,下降了1118美元。结论:在我们的研究期间,每位受益人的平均医院成本上升,而通货膨胀调整后的报销下降。我们发现较低的平均LOS和术后死亡率。AKI的出现率和合并感染率已经上升。接受人工髋关节置换术的患者数量有所增加,但最常见的治疗方法是股骨修复。2016年7月25日,美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)提出了一种新的模式,将捆绑支付扩大到包括手术髋关节和股骨骨折治疗(SHFFT)[1-2]。从理论上讲,这一进展通过为医院创造强有力的激励,以更低的成本提供更好的医疗服务,将医疗保险支付从数量转向质量[3-4]。据估计,每年有30万医疗保险受益人髋部骨折[5]。2014年,平均每1000名受益人中有5.8人髋部骨折[6]。本研究的主要目的是报告2010财年至2015财年美国医院以髋部骨折为主要诊断的MBs的相关趋势。我们报告了接受全髋关节置换术(THA)、部分髋关节置换术(PH)、股骨修复和非手术治疗的患者的结果。我们预测基线合并症的患病率更高,成本更高,报销更低,因为国家政策在美国人口老龄化的背景下支持成本设置。引用本文:Sundaram K, Culler S, Simon A, Jevsevar DS, Gitajn IL,等。(2018)2010-2015年医疗保险受益人髋部骨折入院情况。国际肌肉骨骼疾病杂志:IJMD-107 DOI: 10.29011/ IJMD-107。000007 2卷2018;医疗保险和医疗补助服务数据源中心维护一个名为Med PAR的数据库,其中包含向mb提供服务的所有提交的索赔。我们从这个数据库中获得了从2010年到2015年的数据集。研究人群选择100%的医疗保险A部分和C部分索赔被纳入。在研究期间,CMS要求每次住院索赔,确保c部分没有遗漏索赔。65岁以下的个人可能因残疾而有资格享受医疗保险。经过仔细考虑,我们基于先前的文献决定纳入这一人群,这些文献表明,大多数40-50岁的患者与65岁以上的患者有一个共同的机制——骨质疏松性脆性骨折,摔倒是诱发事件[7]。此外,Kaiser-Family基金会之前的研究发现,65岁以下的mb与65岁以上的mb中有5种或更多疾病的比例相似(31%对28%),这表明共病负担相似[8]。由于我们的数据集的限制,65岁以下的终末期肾病患者符合医疗保险资格,但先前的研究表明,他们占医疗保险总人口的比例不到1%[9-10]。Med Par数据集包括基本人口统计信息、多达25个带有入院(POA)标志的诊断ICD-9-CM代码、主要程序代码、多达24个附加ICD-9-CM程序代码、LOS(以天计算)、出院状态(出院处置或地点)、总费用和医疗保险计划的总报销。在仔细考虑了先前的文献后,我们使用ICD-9代码识别患者。数据支持使用“股骨颈骨折”相对于图表复习(PPV=0.85-0.93)[11-14]。虽然“病理性骨折”通常指骨质疏松性脆性骨折,但一些临床医生可能会将该代码用于转移性疾病的患者。先前的研究表明,在Medicare人群中,转移相关的肿瘤性骨折发生率非常低(每1000 MB 0.3例),并且在排除“病理性骨折”时存在假阴性的风险,因此我们选择使用ICD-9代码733.14来诊断股骨颈病理性骨折[15-16]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validity of the Yellow Flag Risk Form in People Treated for Low Back Pain with Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy and the Pain Mechanism Classification System Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Behcet’s Disease Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation in Dysferlinopathy Genetic Mutations and Treatment of Spinocerebellar Ataxias Hip Fracture Admissions Among Medicare Beneficiaries 2010-2015 -Rising Hospital Costs and Falling Reimbursements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1