Ecological Validation of WHODAS 2.0 for Disability Assessment in Pakistan

Afaf Manzoor, A. Hameed, H. Munir
{"title":"Ecological Validation of WHODAS 2.0 for Disability Assessment in Pakistan","authors":"Afaf Manzoor, A. Hameed, H. Munir","doi":"10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disability is a complicated term to define, especially in a country like Pakistan, where the definition of disability is still debatable. The existing service delivery models, including disability assessment, are based on the medical model. The objective of the study was to use the standardized instrument WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2.0) and establish its ecological validity for disability assessment in Pakistan. Data was collected from 371 out-of-school children with disabilities from three districts of Punjab by using the purposive sampling technique. An innovative method was used to establish ecological validity by taking 45 randomly selected cases among samples, and these cases were presented to a panel of nine experts/raters. The findings of the study concluded a correlation between raters' total score and total sample score, which was found positively strong and significant as r = .819, p = < .001, and it indicated that the use of the WHODAS 2.0 version is ecologically fit forthe use of disability assessment.","PeriodicalId":129253,"journal":{"name":"Global Educational Studies Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Educational Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disability is a complicated term to define, especially in a country like Pakistan, where the definition of disability is still debatable. The existing service delivery models, including disability assessment, are based on the medical model. The objective of the study was to use the standardized instrument WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2.0) and establish its ecological validity for disability assessment in Pakistan. Data was collected from 371 out-of-school children with disabilities from three districts of Punjab by using the purposive sampling technique. An innovative method was used to establish ecological validity by taking 45 randomly selected cases among samples, and these cases were presented to a panel of nine experts/raters. The findings of the study concluded a correlation between raters' total score and total sample score, which was found positively strong and significant as r = .819, p = < .001, and it indicated that the use of the WHODAS 2.0 version is ecologically fit forthe use of disability assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦残疾评估WHODAS 2.0的生态学验证
残疾是一个复杂的术语,尤其是在巴基斯坦这样的国家,残疾的定义仍然存在争议。现有的服务提供模式,包括残疾评估,是以医疗模式为基础的。本研究的目的是使用标准化的世卫组织残疾评估表(WHODAS-2.0),并建立其在巴基斯坦残疾评估中的生态效度。采用目的抽样技术,从旁遮普三个县的371名失学残疾儿童中收集数据。采用一种创新的方法,从样本中随机抽取45个案例,并将这些案例提交给由9名专家/评分者组成的小组,以建立生态效度。研究结果表明,评分者总分与样本总分存在显著正相关(r = .819, p = < .001),表明使用WHODAS 2.0版本在生态上适合于残障评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Role of Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership: A Study of School Principals from Urban Politeness in the Classrooms of the Visually Impaired Students: A Case Study Effect of Higher Education in Fostering Civic Values among University Students Exploring the Entrepreneurial Intention, Expectations of Success and Self-efficacy among the Students of Physical Education and Sports Sciences in Pakistan Effect of Supervision on Teachers' Performance at the Secondary Level in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1