Boycotting as Ethical Consumerism

Suneal Bedi
{"title":"Boycotting as Ethical Consumerism","authors":"Suneal Bedi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3440824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Boycotting in response to corporations making political or social statements is an ever-increasing phenomenon. While some have argued that boycotting is an impermissible form of consumer behavior, this article argues that boycotting should be considered a form of ethical consumerism. Historically, ethical consumerism has focused on charitable giving and sustainable consumption — behaviors that utilize consumer market power to do “good”. This article argues that expressive boycotting (publicly expressing dissatisfaction with a company’s political statement by not buying its products) also harnesses consumer market power to do “good” — the good being promoting certain procedural democratic principles. \n \nThe recent increase in corporations taking political and social stands creates an imbalance of power in the marketplace of ideas. By boycotting, consumers engage in counter speech and make the marketplace of ideas more robust and efficient. Hence, this article argues that this form of consumer behavior should be encouraged. The article concludes with a research agenda for consumer psychologists to better understand expressive consumer boycotts and to begin to develop interventions to encourage them.","PeriodicalId":315186,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Sustainable Capitalism (Topic)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Sustainable Capitalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Boycotting in response to corporations making political or social statements is an ever-increasing phenomenon. While some have argued that boycotting is an impermissible form of consumer behavior, this article argues that boycotting should be considered a form of ethical consumerism. Historically, ethical consumerism has focused on charitable giving and sustainable consumption — behaviors that utilize consumer market power to do “good”. This article argues that expressive boycotting (publicly expressing dissatisfaction with a company’s political statement by not buying its products) also harnesses consumer market power to do “good” — the good being promoting certain procedural democratic principles. The recent increase in corporations taking political and social stands creates an imbalance of power in the marketplace of ideas. By boycotting, consumers engage in counter speech and make the marketplace of ideas more robust and efficient. Hence, this article argues that this form of consumer behavior should be encouraged. The article concludes with a research agenda for consumer psychologists to better understand expressive consumer boycotts and to begin to develop interventions to encourage them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抵制是道德消费主义
抵制公司发表政治或社会声明的现象越来越多。虽然有些人认为抵制是一种不允许的消费行为形式,但本文认为抵制应被视为一种道德消费主义形式。从历史上看,道德消费主义关注的是慈善捐赠和可持续消费——利用消费者市场力量做“好事”的行为。本文认为,表达性抵制(通过不购买某公司的产品,公开表达对该公司政治声明的不满)也利用了消费者市场的力量来做“好事”——好事是促进某些程序性民主原则。最近越来越多的公司采取政治和社会立场,造成了思想市场的权力不平衡。通过抵制,消费者参与了反言论,使思想市场更加活跃和高效。因此,本文认为应该鼓励这种形式的消费者行为。文章最后提出了一个消费者心理学家的研究议程,以更好地理解富有表现力的消费者抵制行为,并开始制定干预措施来鼓励他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Purpose: Towards a Unified Theory of Responsible Investment Behaviour Modification Model for Improving Social Capital and Fostering Eclectic Theories of Economics Sustainable Capital Market: A Mini-Review Corporate Governance Through Voice and Exit Boycotting as Ethical Consumerism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1