How Much Income Do Retirees Actually Have? Evaluating the Evidence from Five National Datasets

Anqi Chen, A. Munnell, Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher
{"title":"How Much Income Do Retirees Actually Have? Evaluating the Evidence from Five National Datasets","authors":"Anqi Chen, A. Munnell, Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3290751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research by Bee and Mitchell (2017) has refocused attention on the fact that the Current Population Survey (CPS) underestimates retirement income. In the wake of this study, some observers have questioned whether other surveys more frequently used by retirement researchers also understate retirement income and, if so, whether prior research suggesting that many households are unprepared for retirement is accurate. This paper addresses both questions by examining retirement income data from the CPS and four other surveys: 1) the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF); 2) the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); 3) the Panel Survey of Income Dynamics (PSID); and 4) the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). The paper compares the income measures from each survey to administrative data from tax and Social Security records, both in aggregate and across the income distribution. It then uses a common measure of retirement income adequacy, the replacement rate, to assess overall household preparedness for retirement.","PeriodicalId":284824,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Retirement Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Retirement Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3290751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Recent research by Bee and Mitchell (2017) has refocused attention on the fact that the Current Population Survey (CPS) underestimates retirement income. In the wake of this study, some observers have questioned whether other surveys more frequently used by retirement researchers also understate retirement income and, if so, whether prior research suggesting that many households are unprepared for retirement is accurate. This paper addresses both questions by examining retirement income data from the CPS and four other surveys: 1) the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF); 2) the Health and Retirement Study (HRS); 3) the Panel Survey of Income Dynamics (PSID); and 4) the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). The paper compares the income measures from each survey to administrative data from tax and Social Security records, both in aggregate and across the income distribution. It then uses a common measure of retirement income adequacy, the replacement rate, to assess overall household preparedness for retirement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退休人员到底有多少收入?评估来自五个国家数据集的证据
Bee和Mitchell(2017)最近的研究将注意力重新集中在当前人口调查(CPS)低估退休收入的事实上。在这项研究之后,一些观察人士质疑,退休研究人员更经常使用的其他调查是否也低估了退休收入,如果是这样,先前的研究表明,许多家庭没有为退休做好准备,这是否准确。本文通过研究CPS和其他四项调查的退休收入数据来解决这两个问题:1)消费者财务调查(SCF);2)健康与退休研究(HRS);3)收入动态面板调查(PSID);4)收入和计划参与调查(SIPP)。本文将每次调查所得的收入指标与来自税收和社会保障记录的行政数据进行了比较,无论是在总体上还是在收入分配上。然后,它使用一种衡量退休收入充足性的常用方法,即替代率,来评估家庭对退休的总体准备情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Are Older Workers Moving Less While Working Longer? Need to Increase the Public Servants’ Retirement Age to 65 in Uganda: Policy Report. How Best to Annuitize Defined Contribution Assets? How Much Income Do Retirees Actually Have? Evaluating the Evidence from Five National Datasets Family Transfers with Retirement-Aged Adults in the United States: Kin Availability, Wealth Differentials, Geographic Proximity, Gender, and Racial Disparities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1