The Diagnostic Value Of Mattis Dementia Rating Scale- Initiation Perseveration Subscale In Vascular Cognitive Disorders

NEURO RESEARCH Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35702/nrj.10002
G. Paraskevas, E. Kapaki, V. Constantinides, G. Liakakis, I. Theotoka, P. Paraskevas, I. Zalonis
{"title":"The Diagnostic Value Of Mattis Dementia Rating Scale- Initiation Perseveration Subscale In Vascular Cognitive Disorders","authors":"G. Paraskevas, E. Kapaki, V. Constantinides, G. Liakakis, I. Theotoka, P. Paraskevas, I. Zalonis","doi":"10.35702/nrj.10002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vascular cognitive disorder (VCD)2 comprises a heterogeneous group of cerebrovascular disorders, leading to a continuum of cognitive impairment, ranging from the level of mild cognitive impairment or mild vascular cognitive disorder (VCDM) to full-blown vascular dementia or major vascular cognitive disorder (VCDD). The Mattis Dementia Rating ScaleInitiation Perseveration subscale (MDRS-IP) may be useful for the assessment of frontal dysfunction, which is significantly affected in most patients with VCD. The aim of the present study was to explore the diagnostic value of MDRS-IP in patients with VCD of various severity. In a total of 140 patients fulfilling most recent criteria for VCDD and VCDM or having cerebrovascular disease with no clinically obvious cognitive decline (vascular controls, VC) and 15 healthy controls (Ctrl) we administered the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the MDRS-IP. Both MMSE and MDRS-IP perform better at the dementia level of VCD (VCDD), being effective in the discrimination of vascular dementia from the Ctrl or VC groups. However, in patients with VCDM, MMSE and MDRS-IP have statistically significant, but clinically moderate ability to differentiate from Ctrl or VC, i.e., to identify cognitive dysfunction in early, pre-dementia stages. Finally, both tests failed in the discrimination between VC and Ctrl, indicating that they are not sensitive enough to identify patients with cerebrovascular disease and subclinical cognitive dysfunction.","PeriodicalId":201976,"journal":{"name":"NEURO RESEARCH","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEURO RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35702/nrj.10002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vascular cognitive disorder (VCD)2 comprises a heterogeneous group of cerebrovascular disorders, leading to a continuum of cognitive impairment, ranging from the level of mild cognitive impairment or mild vascular cognitive disorder (VCDM) to full-blown vascular dementia or major vascular cognitive disorder (VCDD). The Mattis Dementia Rating ScaleInitiation Perseveration subscale (MDRS-IP) may be useful for the assessment of frontal dysfunction, which is significantly affected in most patients with VCD. The aim of the present study was to explore the diagnostic value of MDRS-IP in patients with VCD of various severity. In a total of 140 patients fulfilling most recent criteria for VCDD and VCDM or having cerebrovascular disease with no clinically obvious cognitive decline (vascular controls, VC) and 15 healthy controls (Ctrl) we administered the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the MDRS-IP. Both MMSE and MDRS-IP perform better at the dementia level of VCD (VCDD), being effective in the discrimination of vascular dementia from the Ctrl or VC groups. However, in patients with VCDM, MMSE and MDRS-IP have statistically significant, but clinically moderate ability to differentiate from Ctrl or VC, i.e., to identify cognitive dysfunction in early, pre-dementia stages. Finally, both tests failed in the discrimination between VC and Ctrl, indicating that they are not sensitive enough to identify patients with cerebrovascular disease and subclinical cognitive dysfunction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马蒂斯痴呆评定量表-起始持续亚量表在血管性认知障碍中的诊断价值
血管性认知障碍(VCD)2包括异质性脑血管疾病,导致连续的认知障碍,从轻度认知障碍或轻度血管性认知障碍(VCDM)水平到全面血管性痴呆或严重血管性认知障碍(VCDD)水平。Mattis痴呆评定量表启动持续亚量表(MDRS-IP)可能对评估额叶功能障碍有用,这在大多数VCD患者中受到显著影响。本研究旨在探讨mdr - ip在不同严重程度VCD患者中的诊断价值。在140例符合VCDD和VCDM最新标准或患有脑血管疾病且无临床明显认知能力下降的患者(血管对照组,VC)和15例健康对照组(Ctrl)中,我们进行了迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和MDRS-IP。MMSE和mdr - ip在VCD (VCDD)痴呆水平上表现较好,可有效区分血管性痴呆与Ctrl或VC组。然而,在VCDM患者中,MMSE和mdr - ip与Ctrl或VC的区分能力具有统计学意义,但临床上具有中等水平,即识别早期痴呆前期认知功能障碍的能力。最后,两项测试都不能区分VC和Ctrl,说明它们在识别脑血管疾病和亚临床认知功能障碍患者方面不够敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Transorbital Neuroendoscopic Surgery (TONES) for a Case of Cavernoma-Associated Epilepsy Within the Mesial Temporal Lobe Blink Reflex Value in the Early Diagnosis of Guillain-Barre Syndrome Brain CT-Scan Features in Methanol Toxicity and Their Association with Clinical Manifestations and Outcome; a Cross-Sectional Study Asymptomatic Isolated Congenital Cervical Dermal Sinus Are Human Needs Fulfilled In Treatment Adherence In Hemodialysis? A Crossover between Social Work and Neurology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1