{"title":"RSE-M - ASME XI - API 579: Comparison of Failure Assessment Diagrams (FAD)","authors":"C. Faidy","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a short review of the 3 Codes in term of flaw evaluation, this paper will consider the Failure Assessment Diagrams (FAD) proposed in each of them.\n The cracked components are evaluated by a dedicated diagram for margin evaluation of ductile tearing resistance of the components: the elastic stress intensity factor of the crack normalized by the toughness of the material on one axis and the applied stresses normalized by a Reference Stress in the other axis.\n The 2017 Edition of RSE-M Appendix 5.4 and 5.6, the 2017 Edition of ASME XI Appendix H and the 2016 Edition of API 579 Part 9 will be used in this first comparison.","PeriodicalId":128383,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After a short review of the 3 Codes in term of flaw evaluation, this paper will consider the Failure Assessment Diagrams (FAD) proposed in each of them.
The cracked components are evaluated by a dedicated diagram for margin evaluation of ductile tearing resistance of the components: the elastic stress intensity factor of the crack normalized by the toughness of the material on one axis and the applied stresses normalized by a Reference Stress in the other axis.
The 2017 Edition of RSE-M Appendix 5.4 and 5.6, the 2017 Edition of ASME XI Appendix H and the 2016 Edition of API 579 Part 9 will be used in this first comparison.