Tolerance boundaries and cultural egalitarianism

Saulius Kanišauskas
{"title":"Tolerance boundaries and cultural egalitarianism","authors":"Saulius Kanišauskas","doi":"10.3846/limes.2010.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance concludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (stably). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the majority and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.","PeriodicalId":256919,"journal":{"name":"LIMES: Cultural Regionalistics","volume":"395 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIMES: Cultural Regionalistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/limes.2010.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The significance of formal criteria which could help to sort out the problem of tolerance paradox has emerged in the background of cultural egalitarianism. Alas, such criteria have not been established so far. The conviction that the problem of tolerance is significant just in the context of social and political discourse might be questioned due to the fact that this attitude did not help to tackle this problem throughout the last centuries. The paper aims to show that the problem of tolerance can be solved taking into account systemic attitude and synergetic insights. The current study into the literature on tolerance concludes that the formal criterion, which defines the tolerance boundaries in the most general sense, is considered to be such deviations from the standard (as ideal parameters of social system) when tolerance can function normally (stably). Cultural egalitarianism, which requires equalizing the rights of the majority and the minorities facing discrimination, impinges on the ratio of necessary diversity, and thus has to be questioned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
容忍界限和文化平等主义
在文化平等主义的背景下,形式标准的意义在于它有助于理清宽容悖论的问题。唉,到目前为止,这样的标准还没有建立起来。认为容忍问题仅在社会和政治话语的背景下具有重要意义的信念可能受到质疑,因为这种态度在过去几个世纪中无助于解决这一问题。本文旨在表明,容忍问题可以通过考虑系统态度和协同见解来解决。目前对宽容文献的研究得出结论,在最一般意义上定义宽容边界的形式标准被认为是当宽容可以正常(稳定)运作时偏离标准的程度(作为社会系统的理想参数)。文化平等主义要求平等对待多数人和面临歧视的少数人的权利,它影响了必要的多样性的比例,因此必须受到质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural territorialization: The case of Grand Duchy of Lithuania System transformation in central and Eastern Europe, economic development and subjective well‐being Interpersonal communication value in globalizing community Art and civil society: From protest to cooperation Sovereignty of a nation in the parliamentary system of Lithuania: Problems and proposals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1