Short message service (SMS) reminders and real-time adherence monitoring improve antiretroviral therapy adherence in rural Uganda

J. Haberer, Angella Musiimenta, E. Atukunda, N. Musinguzi, Monique A Wyatt, N. Ware, D. Bangsberg
{"title":"Short message service (SMS) reminders and real-time adherence monitoring improve antiretroviral therapy adherence in rural Uganda","authors":"J. Haberer, Angella Musiimenta, E. Atukunda, N. Musinguzi, Monique A Wyatt, N. Ware, D. Bangsberg","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:To explore the effects of four types of short message service (SMS) plus real-time adherence monitoring on antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence: daily reminders, weekly reminders, reminders triggered after a late or missed dose (delivered to patients), and notifications triggered by sustained adherence lapses (delivered to patient-nominated social supporters). Design:Pilot randomized controlled trial. Methods:Sixty-three individuals initiating ART received a real-time adherence monitor and were randomized (1 : 1 : 1): (1) Scheduled SMS reminders (daily for 1 month, weekly for 2 months), then SMS reminders triggered by a late or missed dose (no monitoring signal within 2 h of expected dosing); SMS notifications to social supporters for sustained adherence lapses (no monitoring signal for >48 h) added after 3 months. (2) Triggered SMS reminders starting at enrolment; SMS notifications to social supporters added after 3 months. (3) Control: No SMS. HIV RNA was determined at 9 months. Percentage adherence and adherence lapses were compared by linear generalized estimating equations and Poisson regression, respectively. Results:Median age was 31 years, 65% were women, and median enrolment CD4+ cell count was 322 cells/&mgr;l 97% took once daily tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz. Compared to control, adherence was 11.1% higher (P = 0.04) and more than 48-h lapses were less frequent (IRR 0.6, P = 0.02) in the scheduled SMS arm. Adherence and more than 48-h lapses were similar in the triggered SMS arm and control. No differences in HIV RNA were seen. Conclusion:Scheduled SMS reminders improved ART in the context of real-time monitoring. Larger studies are needed to determine the impact of triggered reminders and role of social supporters in improving adherence.","PeriodicalId":355297,"journal":{"name":"AIDS (London, England)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"118","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 118

Abstract

Objective:To explore the effects of four types of short message service (SMS) plus real-time adherence monitoring on antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence: daily reminders, weekly reminders, reminders triggered after a late or missed dose (delivered to patients), and notifications triggered by sustained adherence lapses (delivered to patient-nominated social supporters). Design:Pilot randomized controlled trial. Methods:Sixty-three individuals initiating ART received a real-time adherence monitor and were randomized (1 : 1 : 1): (1) Scheduled SMS reminders (daily for 1 month, weekly for 2 months), then SMS reminders triggered by a late or missed dose (no monitoring signal within 2 h of expected dosing); SMS notifications to social supporters for sustained adherence lapses (no monitoring signal for >48 h) added after 3 months. (2) Triggered SMS reminders starting at enrolment; SMS notifications to social supporters added after 3 months. (3) Control: No SMS. HIV RNA was determined at 9 months. Percentage adherence and adherence lapses were compared by linear generalized estimating equations and Poisson regression, respectively. Results:Median age was 31 years, 65% were women, and median enrolment CD4+ cell count was 322 cells/&mgr;l 97% took once daily tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz. Compared to control, adherence was 11.1% higher (P = 0.04) and more than 48-h lapses were less frequent (IRR 0.6, P = 0.02) in the scheduled SMS arm. Adherence and more than 48-h lapses were similar in the triggered SMS arm and control. No differences in HIV RNA were seen. Conclusion:Scheduled SMS reminders improved ART in the context of real-time monitoring. Larger studies are needed to determine the impact of triggered reminders and role of social supporters in improving adherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短信提醒服务和实时依从性监测改善了乌干达农村地区抗逆转录病毒治疗的依从性
目的:探讨四种类型的短信服务(SMS)加实时依从性监测对抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)依从性的影响:每日提醒、每周提醒、延迟或错过剂量后触发的提醒(发送给患者),以及持续依从性失效触发的通知(发送给患者指定的社会支持者)。设计:先导随机对照试验。方法:63名开始抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者接受实时依从性监测,随机分组(1:1:1):(1)定期短信提醒(1个月每天一次,2个月每周一次),然后延迟或错过给药触发短信提醒(在预期给药后2小时内没有监测信号);3个月后增加短信通知给持续依从性缺失的社会支持者(超过48小时没有监测信号)。(2)从报名开始触发短信提醒;3个月后增加了向社会支持者发送短信通知。(3)控制:无短信。9个月时检测HIV RNA。分别用线性广义估计方程和泊松回归比较依从性百分比和依从性缺失。结果:中位年龄为31岁,65%为女性,中位入组CD4+细胞计数为322个/例,97%每天服用一次替诺福韦/恩替他宾/依非韦伦。与对照组相比,依从性高11.1% (P = 0.04),超过48小时的失误发生率较低(IRR 0.6, P = 0.02)。在触发SMS组和对照组中,依从性和超过48小时的失效相似。HIV RNA未见差异。结论:在实时监测的情况下,定期短信提醒可改善ART。需要更大规模的研究来确定触发提醒的影响和社会支持者在提高依从性方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary HIV infection during chronic treatment with imatinib: impact on infection dynamics Coronavirus disease 2019 outcomes in a population-based cohort of people with HIV and a matched cohort of people without HIV during Omicron variant waves Vespers: A nursing origin story set in the dawn of the HIV pandemic Presence of the M184I mutation after short-term exposure to azvudine for COVID-19 in people living with HIV Glottic Kaposi's sarcoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1