An Intelligent Duplicate Bug Report Detection Method Based on Technical Term Extraction

Xiaoxue Wu, Wenjing Shan, Wei Zheng, Zhiguo Chen, Tao Ren, Xiaobing Sun
{"title":"An Intelligent Duplicate Bug Report Detection Method Based on Technical Term Extraction","authors":"Xiaoxue Wu, Wenjing Shan, Wei Zheng, Zhiguo Chen, Tao Ren, Xiaobing Sun","doi":"10.1109/AST58925.2023.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the bug description data generated during the software maintenance cycle, bug reports are usually hastily written by different users, resulting in many redundant and duplicate bug reports (DBRs). Once the DBRs are repeatedly assigned to developers, it will inevitably lead to a serious waste of human resources, especially for large-scale open-source projects. Recently, many experts and scholars have devoted themselves to researching the detection of DBRs and put forward a series of detection methods for DBRs. However, there is still much room for improvement in the performance of DBR prediction. Therefore, this paper proposes a new method for detecting DBR based on technical term extraction, CTEDB (Combination of Term Extraction and DeBERTaV3) for short. This method first extracts technical terms from the text information of bug reports based on Word2Vec and TextRank algorithms. Then it calculates the semantic similarity of technical terms between different bug reports by combining Word2Vec and SBERT models. Finally, it completes the DBR detection task by combining the DeBERTaV3 model. The experimental results show that CTEDB has achieved good results in detecting DBR, and has obviously improved the accuracy, F1-score, recall and precision compared with the baseline approaches.","PeriodicalId":252417,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automation of Software Test (AST)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automation of Software Test (AST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AST58925.2023.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the bug description data generated during the software maintenance cycle, bug reports are usually hastily written by different users, resulting in many redundant and duplicate bug reports (DBRs). Once the DBRs are repeatedly assigned to developers, it will inevitably lead to a serious waste of human resources, especially for large-scale open-source projects. Recently, many experts and scholars have devoted themselves to researching the detection of DBRs and put forward a series of detection methods for DBRs. However, there is still much room for improvement in the performance of DBR prediction. Therefore, this paper proposes a new method for detecting DBR based on technical term extraction, CTEDB (Combination of Term Extraction and DeBERTaV3) for short. This method first extracts technical terms from the text information of bug reports based on Word2Vec and TextRank algorithms. Then it calculates the semantic similarity of technical terms between different bug reports by combining Word2Vec and SBERT models. Finally, it completes the DBR detection task by combining the DeBERTaV3 model. The experimental results show that CTEDB has achieved good results in detecting DBR, and has obviously improved the accuracy, F1-score, recall and precision compared with the baseline approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于术语提取的智能重复Bug报告检测方法
bug报告作为软件维护周期中产生的bug描述数据,通常由不同的用户匆忙编写,导致大量冗余和重复的bug报告。一旦将dbr反复分配给开发人员,必然会导致人力资源的严重浪费,特别是对于大型开源项目。近年来,许多专家学者致力于dbr的检测研究,提出了一系列dbr的检测方法。然而,DBR预测的性能仍有很大的提升空间。为此,本文提出了一种基于技术术语提取的DBR检测新方法,简称CTEDB (Combination of term extraction and DeBERTaV3)。该方法首先基于Word2Vec和TextRank算法从bug报告的文本信息中提取技术术语。然后结合Word2Vec和SBERT模型计算不同bug报告之间技术术语的语义相似度。最后结合DeBERTaV3模型完成DBR检测任务。实验结果表明,CTEDB在检测DBR方面取得了较好的效果,与基线方法相比,准确率、f1分数、查全率和查准率均有明显提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FlakyCat: Predicting Flaky Tests Categories using Few-Shot Learning Evaluating the Trade-offs of Text-based Diversity in Test Prioritisation Cross-Project setting using Deep learning Architectures in Just-In-Time Software Fault Prediction: An Investigation AutoMetric: Towards Measuring Open-Source Software Quality Metrics Automatically Detecting Potential User-data Save & Export Losses due to Android App Termination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1