The Reason Why: The English Constitution and the Latent Promise of Liberty in the History of Accounting

W. Funnell
{"title":"The Reason Why: The English Constitution and the Latent Promise of Liberty in the History of Accounting","authors":"W. Funnell","doi":"10.1080/09585200701376618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1215 Magna Carta determined freedom from executive oppression, or liberty, as the essential principle of the English Constitution and parliament as the bulwark against executive attempts to diminish the liberty of individuals. This constitutional precedence of liberty was confirmed after the Revolution in 1688 by the constitutional settlement which strengthened the financial accountability of the executive to parliament. Regular accounting for military expenditures especially became a critical component of the new accountability measures. Despite the overwhelming significance of liberty for the English Constitution and the contributions of accounting to preserving liberty, public sector accounting continues to attract few accounting historians. As a consequence, the vast historical resources contained in British Parliamentary Papers and the records of parliamentary debates continue to go largely unnoticed by all but a few accounting historians.","PeriodicalId":399197,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Business & Financial History","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Business & Financial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585200701376618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Abstract In 1215 Magna Carta determined freedom from executive oppression, or liberty, as the essential principle of the English Constitution and parliament as the bulwark against executive attempts to diminish the liberty of individuals. This constitutional precedence of liberty was confirmed after the Revolution in 1688 by the constitutional settlement which strengthened the financial accountability of the executive to parliament. Regular accounting for military expenditures especially became a critical component of the new accountability measures. Despite the overwhelming significance of liberty for the English Constitution and the contributions of accounting to preserving liberty, public sector accounting continues to attract few accounting historians. As a consequence, the vast historical resources contained in British Parliamentary Papers and the records of parliamentary debates continue to go largely unnoticed by all but a few accounting historians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原因:英国宪法和会计史上自由的潜在希望
1215年,《大宪章》将不受行政压迫的自由确定为英国宪法的基本原则,将议会确定为反对行政部门削弱个人自由的堡垒。1688年革命后,宪法解决方案加强了行政部门对议会的财政责任,从而确认了宪法中自由的优先地位。军事开支的经常会计核算尤其成为新的问责措施的一个关键组成部分。尽管自由对英国宪法和会计对维护自由的贡献具有压倒性的意义,但公共部门会计仍然吸引着很少的会计历史学家。因此,除了少数会计历史学家外,英国议会文件中包含的大量历史资源和议会辩论记录在很大程度上一直被人们所忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accounting in disaster and accounting for disaster: the crisis of the Great Kanto Earthquake, Japan, 1923 The current value-based balance sheet in the context of east Asian colonial management: the case of the Oriental Colonization Company Management, finance and cost control in the Midlands charcoal iron industry The dual audit system for joint stock companies in Japan Transfer pricing: early Italian contributions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1