Current System for Allocation of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Mina Kim, Seirhan Kim, S. Lee, C. Oh, J. Bang
{"title":"Current System for Allocation of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation","authors":"Mina Kim, Seirhan Kim, S. Lee, C. Oh, J. Bang","doi":"10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.3.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was conducted to analyze the current system for allocation of deceased donor kidney transplantation in Korea, which includes an incentive regulation for candidates registered at the Hospital-based Organ Procurement Organization (HOPO). \nMethods: Between January 2011 and November 2016, there were 2,655 deceased donors in Korea. During the same period, there were 21,247 current candidates and recipients of kidney, pancreas and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. We analyzed data from all of these donors, candidates, and recipients. \nResults: Mean waiting times for organ allocation of each priority differed significantly (2nd priority group, 1,701±974 days; 3rd priority group, 1,316±927 days; 4th priority group, 2,077±1,207 days). Additionally, HOPO candidates/deceased donor ratios were very different from each other (maximum, 49; minimum, 0.6). The number of deceased donors in region 1, 2, and 3 were 1,623, 429, and 603, respectively, while the number of transplantations in each region was 3,095, 597, and 1,165, respectively. The candidates registered at region 1 HOPO moved the longest distances on average for transplantation, and this value differed significantly different from that of other regions (56.18±91.9 km vs. 24.66±28.0 km vs. 26.20±37.3 km, P<0.05). \nConclusions: The incentive system of current allocation system for deceased donor kidney in Korea does not coincide with the purpose of the `Declaration of Istanbul` and unnecessary social costs have occurred. Therefore, we should make an effort to change our current allocation system to the geographic sequence of organ allocation system.","PeriodicalId":420886,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.3.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to analyze the current system for allocation of deceased donor kidney transplantation in Korea, which includes an incentive regulation for candidates registered at the Hospital-based Organ Procurement Organization (HOPO). Methods: Between January 2011 and November 2016, there were 2,655 deceased donors in Korea. During the same period, there were 21,247 current candidates and recipients of kidney, pancreas and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. We analyzed data from all of these donors, candidates, and recipients. Results: Mean waiting times for organ allocation of each priority differed significantly (2nd priority group, 1,701±974 days; 3rd priority group, 1,316±927 days; 4th priority group, 2,077±1,207 days). Additionally, HOPO candidates/deceased donor ratios were very different from each other (maximum, 49; minimum, 0.6). The number of deceased donors in region 1, 2, and 3 were 1,623, 429, and 603, respectively, while the number of transplantations in each region was 3,095, 597, and 1,165, respectively. The candidates registered at region 1 HOPO moved the longest distances on average for transplantation, and this value differed significantly different from that of other regions (56.18±91.9 km vs. 24.66±28.0 km vs. 26.20±37.3 km, P<0.05). Conclusions: The incentive system of current allocation system for deceased donor kidney in Korea does not coincide with the purpose of the `Declaration of Istanbul` and unnecessary social costs have occurred. Therefore, we should make an effort to change our current allocation system to the geographic sequence of organ allocation system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
已故供体肾移植分配的现行制度
背景:本研究旨在分析韩国目前分配已故供体肾移植的制度,其中包括对在医院器官采购组织(HOPO)注册的候选人的激励规定。方法:2011年1月至2016年11月,韩国共有2655例死亡献血者。在同一时期,目前有21247名肾脏、胰腺和胰肾同时移植的候选人和接受者。我们分析了所有捐赠者、候选人和接受者的数据。结果:各优先组器官分配的平均等待时间差异有统计学意义(第二优先组,1701±974天;第三优先组,1316±927天;第四优先组,2077±1207天)。此外,HOPO候选者/已故供体比例彼此之间差异很大(最大值为49;至少,0.6)。1区、2区、3区死亡者分别为1623人、429人、603人,移植件数分别为3095人、597人、1165人。在HOPO 1区登记的候选者移植平均移动距离最长,与其他区域的差异有统计学意义(56.18±91.9 km vs. 24.66±28.0 km vs. 26.20±37.3 km, P<0.05)。结论:韩国现行的死者供肾分配激励制度与《伊斯坦布尔宣言》的宗旨不符,造成了不必要的社会成本。因此,我们应该努力改变我国现行的器官分配制度,以地理顺序分配器官。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in kidney transplantation Pediatric liver transplantation in Korea: long-term outcomes and allocations A case of Castleman disease that improved after kidney transplantation Donor Specific Antibody Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection after ABO Incompatible Liver Transplantation Successful Treatment of Invasive Gastric Mucormycosis in a Kidney Transplant Recipient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1