{"title":"Current System for Allocation of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation","authors":"Mina Kim, Seirhan Kim, S. Lee, C. Oh, J. Bang","doi":"10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.3.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was conducted to analyze the current system for allocation of deceased donor kidney transplantation in Korea, which includes an incentive regulation for candidates registered at the Hospital-based Organ Procurement Organization (HOPO). \nMethods: Between January 2011 and November 2016, there were 2,655 deceased donors in Korea. During the same period, there were 21,247 current candidates and recipients of kidney, pancreas and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. We analyzed data from all of these donors, candidates, and recipients. \nResults: Mean waiting times for organ allocation of each priority differed significantly (2nd priority group, 1,701±974 days; 3rd priority group, 1,316±927 days; 4th priority group, 2,077±1,207 days). Additionally, HOPO candidates/deceased donor ratios were very different from each other (maximum, 49; minimum, 0.6). The number of deceased donors in region 1, 2, and 3 were 1,623, 429, and 603, respectively, while the number of transplantations in each region was 3,095, 597, and 1,165, respectively. The candidates registered at region 1 HOPO moved the longest distances on average for transplantation, and this value differed significantly different from that of other regions (56.18±91.9 km vs. 24.66±28.0 km vs. 26.20±37.3 km, P<0.05). \nConclusions: The incentive system of current allocation system for deceased donor kidney in Korea does not coincide with the purpose of the `Declaration of Istanbul` and unnecessary social costs have occurred. Therefore, we should make an effort to change our current allocation system to the geographic sequence of organ allocation system.","PeriodicalId":420886,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.3.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: This study was conducted to analyze the current system for allocation of deceased donor kidney transplantation in Korea, which includes an incentive regulation for candidates registered at the Hospital-based Organ Procurement Organization (HOPO).
Methods: Between January 2011 and November 2016, there were 2,655 deceased donors in Korea. During the same period, there were 21,247 current candidates and recipients of kidney, pancreas and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. We analyzed data from all of these donors, candidates, and recipients.
Results: Mean waiting times for organ allocation of each priority differed significantly (2nd priority group, 1,701±974 days; 3rd priority group, 1,316±927 days; 4th priority group, 2,077±1,207 days). Additionally, HOPO candidates/deceased donor ratios were very different from each other (maximum, 49; minimum, 0.6). The number of deceased donors in region 1, 2, and 3 were 1,623, 429, and 603, respectively, while the number of transplantations in each region was 3,095, 597, and 1,165, respectively. The candidates registered at region 1 HOPO moved the longest distances on average for transplantation, and this value differed significantly different from that of other regions (56.18±91.9 km vs. 24.66±28.0 km vs. 26.20±37.3 km, P<0.05).
Conclusions: The incentive system of current allocation system for deceased donor kidney in Korea does not coincide with the purpose of the `Declaration of Istanbul` and unnecessary social costs have occurred. Therefore, we should make an effort to change our current allocation system to the geographic sequence of organ allocation system.
背景:本研究旨在分析韩国目前分配已故供体肾移植的制度,其中包括对在医院器官采购组织(HOPO)注册的候选人的激励规定。方法:2011年1月至2016年11月,韩国共有2655例死亡献血者。在同一时期,目前有21247名肾脏、胰腺和胰肾同时移植的候选人和接受者。我们分析了所有捐赠者、候选人和接受者的数据。结果:各优先组器官分配的平均等待时间差异有统计学意义(第二优先组,1701±974天;第三优先组,1316±927天;第四优先组,2077±1207天)。此外,HOPO候选者/已故供体比例彼此之间差异很大(最大值为49;至少,0.6)。1区、2区、3区死亡者分别为1623人、429人、603人,移植件数分别为3095人、597人、1165人。在HOPO 1区登记的候选者移植平均移动距离最长,与其他区域的差异有统计学意义(56.18±91.9 km vs. 24.66±28.0 km vs. 26.20±37.3 km, P<0.05)。结论:韩国现行的死者供肾分配激励制度与《伊斯坦布尔宣言》的宗旨不符,造成了不必要的社会成本。因此,我们应该努力改变我国现行的器官分配制度,以地理顺序分配器官。