Scanpath comparison in medical image reading skills of dental students: distinguishing stages of expertise development

Nora Castner, Enkelejda Kasneci, Thomas C. Kübler, K. Scheiter, Juliane Richter, Thérése F. Eder, F. Hüttig, C. Keutel
{"title":"Scanpath comparison in medical image reading skills of dental students: distinguishing stages of expertise development","authors":"Nora Castner, Enkelejda Kasneci, Thomas C. Kübler, K. Scheiter, Juliane Richter, Thérése F. Eder, F. Hüttig, C. Keutel","doi":"10.1145/3204493.3204550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A popular topic in eye tracking is the difference between novices and experts and their domain-specific eye movement behaviors. However, very little is researched regarding how expertise develops, and more specifically, the developmental stages of eye movement behaviors. Our work compares the scanpaths of five semesters of dental students viewing orthopantomograms (OPTs) with classifiers to distinguish sixth semester through tenth semester students. We used the analysis algorithm SubsMatch 2.0 and the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm. Overall, both classifiers were able distinguish the stages of expertise in medical image reading above chance level. Specifically, it was able to accurately determine sixth semester students with no prior training as well as sixth semester students after training. Ultimately, using scanpath models to recognize gaze patterns characteristic of learning stages, we can provide more adaptive, gaze-based training for students.","PeriodicalId":237808,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

A popular topic in eye tracking is the difference between novices and experts and their domain-specific eye movement behaviors. However, very little is researched regarding how expertise develops, and more specifically, the developmental stages of eye movement behaviors. Our work compares the scanpaths of five semesters of dental students viewing orthopantomograms (OPTs) with classifiers to distinguish sixth semester through tenth semester students. We used the analysis algorithm SubsMatch 2.0 and the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm. Overall, both classifiers were able distinguish the stages of expertise in medical image reading above chance level. Specifically, it was able to accurately determine sixth semester students with no prior training as well as sixth semester students after training. Ultimately, using scanpath models to recognize gaze patterns characteristic of learning stages, we can provide more adaptive, gaze-based training for students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科学生医学影像阅读技能的扫描路径比较:区分专业发展阶段
在眼动追踪中,一个热门的话题是新手和专家之间的差异以及他们在特定领域的眼动行为。然而,关于专业技能如何发展的研究很少,更具体地说,关于眼动行为的发展阶段的研究很少。我们的工作比较了五个学期牙科学生观看骨科断层扫描(opt)的扫描路径与分类器,以区分第六学期到第十学期的学生。我们使用了分析算法SubsMatch 2.0和Needleman-Wunsch算法。总体而言,两种分类器都能区分医学图像阅读的专业阶段。具体来说,它能够准确地判断出没有事先训练的六学期学生和经过训练的六学期学生。最终,使用扫描路径模型来识别学习阶段的凝视模式特征,我们可以为学生提供更具适应性的、基于凝视的训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating gender difference on algorithmic problems using eye-tracker Eyemic Gaze patterns during remote presentations while listening and speaking An investigation of the effects of n-gram length in scanpath analysis for eye-tracking research Towards concise gaze sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1