Marital Rape in Denmark and Pakistan

Mikele Schultz-Knudsen, R. Mehdi
{"title":"Marital Rape in Denmark and Pakistan","authors":"Mikele Schultz-Knudsen, R. Mehdi","doi":"10.7146/nnjlsr.v1i10.125696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates how rape laws and rape cases are culturally influenced, with a focus on marital rape. The first part of the article looks at cultural influences on rape laws and compares the historical development of these laws in Danish legislation, Pakistani legislation and more broadly in Muslim law. Danish comparative law often compares with legislation in neighboring countries, but comparing to a more different legal system is valuable too. We find that in both Denmark and Pakistan, socio-economic changes challenge existing definitions of rape and marital rape, leading to demands for legal reform, while the legal system tries to maintain as much continuity in the legal definitions as possible. In both jurisdictions, societal views on women and sex also influence how judges and jurors interpret the law, sometimes leading them to contradict the written law. The second part of the article analyzes two court cases involving marital rape in Danish-Pakistani couples. Cultural considerations influenced every part of these court cases, from the questioning of witnesses to the judges’ legal reasoning. Thus, having an understanding of the parties’ culture is important for judges and lawyers. The cases show that culture varies markedly between people from the same national background. Because culture is not uniform, parties are likely to disagree on which cultural rules they followed in their marriage. Judges must be aware that parties may rely on stereotypical cultural views to portray the other party negatively. The article concludes with recommendations, including the need to educate the population as legal concepts of rape change, as well as for judges to be aware of not only the legal culture and the culture of the parties, but also of how their own culture might influence their decisions. The article also reflects on recent legislative changes in Denmark and Pakistan and points out that the debate in Denmark has not considered how consent and threats can have different implications in minority cultures.","PeriodicalId":130064,"journal":{"name":"NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/nnjlsr.v1i10.125696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates how rape laws and rape cases are culturally influenced, with a focus on marital rape. The first part of the article looks at cultural influences on rape laws and compares the historical development of these laws in Danish legislation, Pakistani legislation and more broadly in Muslim law. Danish comparative law often compares with legislation in neighboring countries, but comparing to a more different legal system is valuable too. We find that in both Denmark and Pakistan, socio-economic changes challenge existing definitions of rape and marital rape, leading to demands for legal reform, while the legal system tries to maintain as much continuity in the legal definitions as possible. In both jurisdictions, societal views on women and sex also influence how judges and jurors interpret the law, sometimes leading them to contradict the written law. The second part of the article analyzes two court cases involving marital rape in Danish-Pakistani couples. Cultural considerations influenced every part of these court cases, from the questioning of witnesses to the judges’ legal reasoning. Thus, having an understanding of the parties’ culture is important for judges and lawyers. The cases show that culture varies markedly between people from the same national background. Because culture is not uniform, parties are likely to disagree on which cultural rules they followed in their marriage. Judges must be aware that parties may rely on stereotypical cultural views to portray the other party negatively. The article concludes with recommendations, including the need to educate the population as legal concepts of rape change, as well as for judges to be aware of not only the legal culture and the culture of the parties, but also of how their own culture might influence their decisions. The article also reflects on recent legislative changes in Denmark and Pakistan and points out that the debate in Denmark has not considered how consent and threats can have different implications in minority cultures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦和巴基斯坦的婚内强奸
本文调查了强奸法和强奸案件是如何受到文化影响的,重点是婚内强奸。文章的第一部分着眼于文化对强奸法的影响,并比较这些法律在丹麦立法、巴基斯坦立法以及更广泛的穆斯林法律中的历史发展。丹麦的比较法经常与邻国的立法进行比较,但与一个更不同的法律体系进行比较也很有价值。我们发现,在丹麦和巴基斯坦,社会经济变化挑战了强奸和婚内强奸的现有定义,导致要求进行法律改革,而法律制度则试图尽可能保持法律定义的连续性。在这两个司法管辖区,社会对妇女和性的看法也影响到法官和陪审员如何解释法律,有时导致他们与成文法相抵触。文章的第二部分分析了两起涉及丹麦-巴基斯坦夫妇婚内强奸的法庭案件。文化因素影响了这些法庭案件的每一个部分,从对证人的询问到法官的法律推理。因此,了解当事人的文化对法官和律师来说是很重要的。这些案例表明,来自相同国家背景的人之间的文化差异很大。由于文化不统一,双方在婚姻中遵循的文化规则上可能存在分歧。法官必须意识到,当事人可能依赖刻板的文化观点来负面地描绘对方。文章最后提出了一些建议,包括需要教育民众,因为强奸的法律概念发生了变化,法官不仅要了解法律文化和当事人的文化,还要了解他们自己的文化如何影响他们的决定。这篇文章也反映了丹麦和巴基斯坦最近的立法变化,并指出丹麦的辩论没有考虑到同意和威胁在少数民族文化中会有不同的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural Expertise Intercultural Justice in France: Origins and Evolution Experts and the Judiciary Cultural Expertise in Civil Law in Italy Indigenous Expertise as Cultural Expertise in the World Heritage Protective Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1