A generalised approach to torque ripple compensation in permanent magnet machine control

M. Carpita, D. Colombo, A. Monti
{"title":"A generalised approach to torque ripple compensation in permanent magnet machine control","authors":"M. Carpita, D. Colombo, A. Monti","doi":"10.1109/ISIE.2000.930330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional approach to permanent magnet machine control is based on the distinction between DC and AC machines. The main difference is that in DC machines, the FEM has a trapezoidal shape, while in the AC machines it has a sinusoidal shape. In the first case, typically a scalar two phase approach is applied, while in the second one a vector three phase approach is the typical structure. In a recent paper, the authors showed that for special purpose machines, it is not so easy to make this kind of distinction, both from modeling and control point of view. Starting from that, a unified approach to the control of isotropic permanent magnet machines is proposed, keeping the minimum of the torque ripple as main task. The algorithm is described in detail and the results are confirmed through experimental experiences.","PeriodicalId":298625,"journal":{"name":"ISIE'2000. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No.00TH8543)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISIE'2000. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No.00TH8543)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2000.930330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The traditional approach to permanent magnet machine control is based on the distinction between DC and AC machines. The main difference is that in DC machines, the FEM has a trapezoidal shape, while in the AC machines it has a sinusoidal shape. In the first case, typically a scalar two phase approach is applied, while in the second one a vector three phase approach is the typical structure. In a recent paper, the authors showed that for special purpose machines, it is not so easy to make this kind of distinction, both from modeling and control point of view. Starting from that, a unified approach to the control of isotropic permanent magnet machines is proposed, keeping the minimum of the torque ripple as main task. The algorithm is described in detail and the results are confirmed through experimental experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
永磁电机控制中转矩脉动补偿的广义方法
传统的永磁电机控制方法是基于直流电机和交流电机的区别。主要的区别是,在直流电机中,有限元具有梯形形状,而在交流电机中,它具有正弦形状。在第一种情况下,通常采用标量两相方法,而在第二种情况下,矢量三相方法是典型的结构。在最近的一篇论文中,作者表明,对于特殊用途的机器,从建模和控制的角度来看,做出这种区分并不那么容易。在此基础上,提出了一种以保持转矩脉动最小为主要任务的各向同性永磁电机统一控制方法。详细介绍了该算法,并通过实验验证了算法的正确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engineering of distributed control systems Modeling conducted EMI noise generation and propagation in boost converters Application of hybrid power systems of low power to the remote radio equipment telecommunication Identification of nonlinear systems based on the bispectrum and a second order Volterra model A fuzzy logic feed-forward current controller for PWM rectifiers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1