Dobre Andov, Danica Andreevska, E. Simeonovska, T. Dimitrovski, Jashka Ibraim
{"title":"INFLUENCE OF HARVESTING METHODS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF RICE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA","authors":"Dobre Andov, Danica Andreevska, E. Simeonovska, T. Dimitrovski, Jashka Ibraim","doi":"10.55302/jafes18722164a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the influence of two different paddy harvesting methods (manual harvesting and combine harvesting) on paddy yield, head rice yield and white rice yield was investigated. Field trials were set up in three different locations in the rice producing regions Kocani, Cesinovo-Oblesevo and Stip under the standard production technology, adopted in the entire Macedonian rice production. Two Italian introduced varieties (San Andrea and Onice) were included in the trials. Samples were taken from the treatments with different methods of harvesting (manual and combine harvesting) from which the paddy rice yield data were collected directly. In order to determine the head rice yield, laboratory milling of paddy grains was performed on a paddy quality testing machine (three average samples of 100 g per treatment, duration of milling 1,40 min.). On the base of the data for paddy rice yield and head rice yield, the white rice yield was estimated. According to the results obtained, the highest paddy rice yield (11,925.67 kg ha -1 ) as well as the highest white rice yield (6,710.57 kg ha -1 ) were achieved in the treatment with manual harvesting in Kocani region (San Andrea variety). The highest head rice yield (65.80 %) was determined in the treatment with manual harvesting in Stip region (Onice variety), while the lowest head rice yield (43.90 %) was in the treatment with combine harvesting of the variety Onice in Kocani region. In general, the method of manual harvesting resulted in higher values of paddy yield, head rice yield and white rice yield compared to the method of mechanized, combine harvesting in all the examined treatments (two varieties, three locations).","PeriodicalId":414064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences","volume":"236 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55302/jafes18722164a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, the influence of two different paddy harvesting methods (manual harvesting and combine harvesting) on paddy yield, head rice yield and white rice yield was investigated. Field trials were set up in three different locations in the rice producing regions Kocani, Cesinovo-Oblesevo and Stip under the standard production technology, adopted in the entire Macedonian rice production. Two Italian introduced varieties (San Andrea and Onice) were included in the trials. Samples were taken from the treatments with different methods of harvesting (manual and combine harvesting) from which the paddy rice yield data were collected directly. In order to determine the head rice yield, laboratory milling of paddy grains was performed on a paddy quality testing machine (three average samples of 100 g per treatment, duration of milling 1,40 min.). On the base of the data for paddy rice yield and head rice yield, the white rice yield was estimated. According to the results obtained, the highest paddy rice yield (11,925.67 kg ha -1 ) as well as the highest white rice yield (6,710.57 kg ha -1 ) were achieved in the treatment with manual harvesting in Kocani region (San Andrea variety). The highest head rice yield (65.80 %) was determined in the treatment with manual harvesting in Stip region (Onice variety), while the lowest head rice yield (43.90 %) was in the treatment with combine harvesting of the variety Onice in Kocani region. In general, the method of manual harvesting resulted in higher values of paddy yield, head rice yield and white rice yield compared to the method of mechanized, combine harvesting in all the examined treatments (two varieties, three locations).
研究了两种不同的水稻收获方式(人工收获和联合收获)对水稻产量、抽穗产量和白米产量的影响。在科卡尼、切西诺沃-奥布列塞沃和斯蒂普三个水稻产区的不同地点进行了田间试验,采用了整个马其顿水稻生产中采用的标准生产技术。两种意大利引进品种(圣安德烈亚和奥尼斯)被纳入了试验。采用不同的收获方式(手工和联合收获)采集样品,直接收集水稻产量数据。为了确定抽穗产量,在水稻质量试验机上进行了水稻籽粒的实验室碾磨(3个平均样品,每次处理100 g,碾磨时间1,40 min)。在水稻产量和抽穗产量的基础上,对白米产量进行了估算。结果表明,科卡尼地区(圣安德烈品种)的水稻产量最高(11,925.67 kg ha -1),白米产量最高(6,710.57 kg ha -1)。在Stip地区,手工采收处理的抽穗产量最高(65.80%),而在Kocani地区,联合采收处理的抽穗产量最低(43.90%)。总的来说,在所有试验处理(2个品种,3个地点)中,人工收获方法的水稻产量、抽穗产量和白米产量均高于机械化联合收获方法。