E-Summary Teaching Materials with Hannafin & Peck Models for Training Participants in the Human Resources Development Agency

Pauline Tricia Andriani, I. G. W. Sudatha, I. K. Suartama
{"title":"E-Summary Teaching Materials with Hannafin & Peck Models for Training Participants in the Human Resources Development Agency","authors":"Pauline Tricia Andriani, I. G. W. Sudatha, I. K. Suartama","doi":"10.23887/ijerr.v4i3.40131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe the design of electronic teaching materials packaged in e-summary form, and to determine the validity of e-summary teaching materials according to experts and product trials. This type of research is development research using the Hannafin & Peck model. The types of data in this study are quantitative and qualitative data. The research data collection used the document recording method and the questionnaire method. The data analysis technique used is descriptive quantitative analysis technique, and descriptive qualitative. The results of the study (1) The design of this e-summary teaching material consists of three stages, namely the needs analysis stage, the design stage, the development and implementation stage. And at each stage it passes through the evaluation stage. (2) The validity of the development of e-summary teaching materials is measured through (a) the results of the content/content expert review by obtaining a percentage of 93.3% being in very good qualification, (b) the results of the e-summary linguist review being 87.5% being on good qualifications (c) the results of the review of individual trials show that the percentage of the overall subject is 97.1% with very good qualifications and (d) the results of the small group trial review show that the percentage of the overall subject is 96.3% with very good qualifications. . In general, the research results show that e-summary is valid with very good quality and is suitable for use in the learning process in creative thinking training. Suggestions that can be given from the results of this study are that this e-summary teaching material can be used optimally in the learning process so that it can increase the training participants' self-study motivation and make it easier to understand the training material.","PeriodicalId":107037,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i3.40131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to describe the design of electronic teaching materials packaged in e-summary form, and to determine the validity of e-summary teaching materials according to experts and product trials. This type of research is development research using the Hannafin & Peck model. The types of data in this study are quantitative and qualitative data. The research data collection used the document recording method and the questionnaire method. The data analysis technique used is descriptive quantitative analysis technique, and descriptive qualitative. The results of the study (1) The design of this e-summary teaching material consists of three stages, namely the needs analysis stage, the design stage, the development and implementation stage. And at each stage it passes through the evaluation stage. (2) The validity of the development of e-summary teaching materials is measured through (a) the results of the content/content expert review by obtaining a percentage of 93.3% being in very good qualification, (b) the results of the e-summary linguist review being 87.5% being on good qualifications (c) the results of the review of individual trials show that the percentage of the overall subject is 97.1% with very good qualifications and (d) the results of the small group trial review show that the percentage of the overall subject is 96.3% with very good qualifications. . In general, the research results show that e-summary is valid with very good quality and is suitable for use in the learning process in creative thinking training. Suggestions that can be given from the results of this study are that this e-summary teaching material can be used optimally in the learning process so that it can increase the training participants' self-study motivation and make it easier to understand the training material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人力资源开发机构培训参与者的汉纳芬与派克模型电子摘要教材
本研究旨在描述以电子摘要形式包装的电子教材的设计,并根据专家和产品试验来确定电子摘要教材的有效性。这种类型的研究是使用Hannafin & Peck模型的发展研究。本研究的数据类型分为定量数据和定性数据。研究资料收集采用文献记录法和问卷调查法。使用的数据分析技术是描述性定量分析技术和描述性定性分析技术。(1)本电子摘要教材的设计分为三个阶段,即需求分析阶段、设计阶段、开发实施阶段。每个阶段都要经过评估阶段。(2)电子摘要教材开发的有效性是通过(a)内容/内容专家评审的结果来衡量的,获得了93.3%的非常好的资格百分比;(b)电子摘要语言学家审查的结果为87.5%为良好资格;(c)个别试验审查的结果显示,整体受试者的百分比为97.1%,具有良好资格;(d)小组试验审查的结果显示,整体受试者的百分比为96.3%,具有良好资格。总的来说,研究结果表明电子摘要是有效的,质量很好,适合在创造性思维训练的学习过程中使用。从本研究的结果可以得出建议,该电子摘要教材可以在学习过程中得到最佳的利用,以提高培训参与者的自学动机,并使其更容易理解培训材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Moderation Effect of Role Ambiguity in Relationship of Role Conflict and Occupational Stress After Covid-19 Science Teachers' Perceptions of Web-Based Learning Raising Students’ Awareness on Environmental Education Issues Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Solving Mathematical Problems: Systematic Literature Review The Effectiveness of RME Approach to Elementary School Students' Mathematical Abilities: A Meta-Analysis Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1