Role of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging in response assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) – A prospective study

M. Reddy Bursapalle, J. Valakkadaa, A. Ayappan
{"title":"Role of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging in response assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) – A prospective study","authors":"M. Reddy Bursapalle,&nbsp;J. Valakkadaa,&nbsp;A. Ayappan","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) currently is based on arterial phase enhancement which doesn’t take into microstructural changes in the tumor after trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE).</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This prospective study was conducted to assess the feasibility and efficacy of intravascular incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) in response evaluation of HCC after TACE.</p><p>39 cirrhotic patients with 48 HCC underwent MR imaging 1 week within and 6weeks after TACE. IVIM parameters like Dslow (true diffusion), Dfast (pseudodiffusion), perfusion fraction and ADC were measured prior to and postTACE. The pre and post TACE values in LR-TR (LIRADS – treatment response) nonviable and viable lesions were compared using paired t-tests. ROC curve analysis was done to calculate sensitivity and specificity and propose cut-off values.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Non-viable lesions showed a significant increase in Dslow (1.208 ± 0.581 vs 1.560 ± 0.494, <em>P</em>-value −.0207) and ADC (1.37 ± 0.53 vs 1.65 ± 0.4287, <em>P</em> value .016) after TACE. There was also significant decrease in Dfast (33.7 ± 10.4 vs 23.75 ± 12.13, <em>P</em> value .0005) and f (19.92 ± 10.54 vs 12.9 ± 10.41, <em>P</em> value .012) values after TACE in non-viable lesions compared to viable lesions. The change in true diffusion had the highest AUC (0.741) among IVIM parameters with greater than 0.075 increase between preTACE and postTACE values having a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 60% respectively for complete response.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IVIM imaging is feasible to assess the response in HCC after TACE. True diffusion is more sensitive and specific than apparent diffusion in evaluating the response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510723000368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) currently is based on arterial phase enhancement which doesn’t take into microstructural changes in the tumor after trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Aim

This prospective study was conducted to assess the feasibility and efficacy of intravascular incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) in response evaluation of HCC after TACE.

39 cirrhotic patients with 48 HCC underwent MR imaging 1 week within and 6weeks after TACE. IVIM parameters like Dslow (true diffusion), Dfast (pseudodiffusion), perfusion fraction and ADC were measured prior to and postTACE. The pre and post TACE values in LR-TR (LIRADS – treatment response) nonviable and viable lesions were compared using paired t-tests. ROC curve analysis was done to calculate sensitivity and specificity and propose cut-off values.

Result

Non-viable lesions showed a significant increase in Dslow (1.208 ± 0.581 vs 1.560 ± 0.494, P-value −.0207) and ADC (1.37 ± 0.53 vs 1.65 ± 0.4287, P value .016) after TACE. There was also significant decrease in Dfast (33.7 ± 10.4 vs 23.75 ± 12.13, P value .0005) and f (19.92 ± 10.54 vs 12.9 ± 10.41, P value .012) values after TACE in non-viable lesions compared to viable lesions. The change in true diffusion had the highest AUC (0.741) among IVIM parameters with greater than 0.075 increase between preTACE and postTACE values having a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 60% respectively for complete response.

Conclusion

IVIM imaging is feasible to assess the response in HCC after TACE. True diffusion is more sensitive and specific than apparent diffusion in evaluating the response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体细胞内非相干运动 (IVIM) 成像在经动脉化疗栓塞 (TACE) 后肝细胞癌反应评估中的作用 - 一项前瞻性研究
这项前瞻性研究旨在评估血管内非相干运动成像(IVIM)在肝细胞癌TACE术后反应评估中的可行性和有效性。39例肝硬化患者和48例肝细胞癌患者分别在TACE术前1周和术后6周接受了磁共振成像。在 TACE 前后分别测量了 Dslow(真扩散)、Dfast(假扩散)、灌注分数和 ADC 等 IVIM 参数。使用配对 t 检验比较 LR-TR(LIRADS-治疗反应)非存活病灶和存活病灶的 TACE 前后值。结果非存活病变在 TACE 后 Dslow(1.208 ± 0.581 vs 1.560 ± 0.494,P 值 -.0207)和 ADC(1.37 ± 0.53 vs 1.65 ± 0.4287,P 值 .016)显著增加。与有活力病变相比,TACE 后无活力病变的 Dfast 值(33.7 ± 10.4 vs 23.75 ± 12.13,P 值.0005)和 f 值(19.92 ± 10.54 vs 12.9 ± 10.41,P 值.012)也明显下降。在 IVIM 参数中,真实弥散的变化具有最高的 AUC (0.741),TACE 前和 TACE 后的值增加大于 0.075,对完全反应的敏感性和特异性分别为 81.8% 和 60%。在评估反应方面,真实弥散比表观弥散更敏感、更特异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching methodologies in the undergraduate teaching of radiology The pathologies of migrants who travel by boat documented on imaging The importance of MDCT in the evaluation of risk factors before the TAVI procedure and its complications after implantation Congenital pyriform apertura stenosis Persistent left superior vena cava: clinical and radiological significance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1