Kali, Clodia, and the Problem of Representation

Iswari P. Pandey
{"title":"Kali, Clodia, and the Problem of Representation","authors":"Iswari P. Pandey","doi":"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201161526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The study of woman in ancient literature is the study of men's views of women and cannot become anything else. --Phyllis Culham (1) Growing up in Nepal in the 70s, I witnessed my grandma worshipping Goddess Kali, a Hindu goddess of supreme power. A devotee of Kali, my grandma used to tell me stories about the many superhuman deeds attributed to the Goddess, one of which was to kill the demons and liberate the gods. Not only did I like the stories, I also identified the Goddess with my own grandmother because like the Goddess of the legends, she had also scored some extraordinary achievements by the standard of her times. She had taken my grandpa to court for his second marriage and extracted a fair share of property for her family. She had raised her only son alone in a much small property while her husband lived with his second wife in a relatively luxurious estate. Although unable to read or write, my grandma knew how to manage the household independently. If the Goddess was mother to the entire civilization, my grandma was the creator and protector of our family. But at about ten, my image of this Goddess came under what I then considered a mortal attack. I was attending a special nine-day, Goddess-worshipping, Fall ritual in which a pundit (literally) reciting and interpreting Devi Mahatmya (In Praise of Goddess) posited that the Goddess had emerged out of the combined energies of the three male gods: Brahma (the Creator), Bishnu (the Protector), and Mahadev (the Destroyer). To my young mind, it was hard to reconcile whether the Goddess was forged by the trinity of gods or she was a cosmic power operating independent of any other sources. According to the stories my grandmother told me, Kali was the cosmic power that started the motion of the wheel of universal time, as well as the primal impulse in the phenomenal existence and becoming. According to this tantric (ritualistic) version of the Goddess cult, while time (or kala, in Sanskrit) \"devours\" the worlds of all the three planes of Creation (the physical universe, the astral/ subtle universe, and the causal universe), at the end it is the Kali that \"devours\" even time (kala). Kali would, therefore, be the primordial cause of creation and destruction and in that could represent both consciousness and absolute existence. But according to this male pundit, the Goddess' existence was predicated on the will and energy of the male gods. Her role was tangential to the purpose set forth by these gods. I kept wondering which version was correct, and how one could reconcile the conflicting images of the same Goddess. To a young mind back then, it was more a problem of reconciliation than of representation. However, when I started pondering the silenced subjects in legends and other classical texts as a student of rhetoric, there was no such confusion. As I read about women in ancient rhetorical texts by men, for example, I knew these were the images of women at men's mercy, as Culham (in the epigraph above) suggests, rather than women's authentic voices. After all, there is hardly anything written by ancient women surviving today. The question, then, is, what do we make of such figures who come to us through somebody else? The question assumes added significance when we know that a given characterization was driven by a clear motive of portraying the subject negatively for tactical gain, as in a court of law. A telling example of such a treatment comes in the figure of Clodia in Cicero's Pro Caelio. (2) Much has been written about Cicero's speech and its cultural politics (3) which I do not intend to rehash in this piece. Instead, I want to use this occasion to engage the issue of representation in recovery and revisionary work. Scholars often wonder about the challenges and possibilities of recovering the historically silenced subjects, usually presenting these issues in ethical terms. Then, the challenge does not pertain simply to the historical accuracy or otherwise of the subjects under study but also, and more importantly, the act of (re)writing them in the ensuing text. …","PeriodicalId":288505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201161526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The study of woman in ancient literature is the study of men's views of women and cannot become anything else. --Phyllis Culham (1) Growing up in Nepal in the 70s, I witnessed my grandma worshipping Goddess Kali, a Hindu goddess of supreme power. A devotee of Kali, my grandma used to tell me stories about the many superhuman deeds attributed to the Goddess, one of which was to kill the demons and liberate the gods. Not only did I like the stories, I also identified the Goddess with my own grandmother because like the Goddess of the legends, she had also scored some extraordinary achievements by the standard of her times. She had taken my grandpa to court for his second marriage and extracted a fair share of property for her family. She had raised her only son alone in a much small property while her husband lived with his second wife in a relatively luxurious estate. Although unable to read or write, my grandma knew how to manage the household independently. If the Goddess was mother to the entire civilization, my grandma was the creator and protector of our family. But at about ten, my image of this Goddess came under what I then considered a mortal attack. I was attending a special nine-day, Goddess-worshipping, Fall ritual in which a pundit (literally) reciting and interpreting Devi Mahatmya (In Praise of Goddess) posited that the Goddess had emerged out of the combined energies of the three male gods: Brahma (the Creator), Bishnu (the Protector), and Mahadev (the Destroyer). To my young mind, it was hard to reconcile whether the Goddess was forged by the trinity of gods or she was a cosmic power operating independent of any other sources. According to the stories my grandmother told me, Kali was the cosmic power that started the motion of the wheel of universal time, as well as the primal impulse in the phenomenal existence and becoming. According to this tantric (ritualistic) version of the Goddess cult, while time (or kala, in Sanskrit) "devours" the worlds of all the three planes of Creation (the physical universe, the astral/ subtle universe, and the causal universe), at the end it is the Kali that "devours" even time (kala). Kali would, therefore, be the primordial cause of creation and destruction and in that could represent both consciousness and absolute existence. But according to this male pundit, the Goddess' existence was predicated on the will and energy of the male gods. Her role was tangential to the purpose set forth by these gods. I kept wondering which version was correct, and how one could reconcile the conflicting images of the same Goddess. To a young mind back then, it was more a problem of reconciliation than of representation. However, when I started pondering the silenced subjects in legends and other classical texts as a student of rhetoric, there was no such confusion. As I read about women in ancient rhetorical texts by men, for example, I knew these were the images of women at men's mercy, as Culham (in the epigraph above) suggests, rather than women's authentic voices. After all, there is hardly anything written by ancient women surviving today. The question, then, is, what do we make of such figures who come to us through somebody else? The question assumes added significance when we know that a given characterization was driven by a clear motive of portraying the subject negatively for tactical gain, as in a court of law. A telling example of such a treatment comes in the figure of Clodia in Cicero's Pro Caelio. (2) Much has been written about Cicero's speech and its cultural politics (3) which I do not intend to rehash in this piece. Instead, I want to use this occasion to engage the issue of representation in recovery and revisionary work. Scholars often wonder about the challenges and possibilities of recovering the historically silenced subjects, usually presenting these issues in ethical terms. Then, the challenge does not pertain simply to the historical accuracy or otherwise of the subjects under study but also, and more importantly, the act of (re)writing them in the ensuing text. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡利,克洛迪亚和代表性问题
古代文学中对女性的研究,是对男性对女性的看法的研究,不能成为别的东西。——菲利斯身为Culham(1)在尼泊尔在70年代长大,我目睹了我奶奶崇拜女神卡莉,印度教女神的最高权力。作为卡莉的信徒,我的祖母过去常常给我讲关于女神的许多超人事迹的故事,其中之一是杀死恶魔,解放众神。我不仅喜欢这些故事,我还把女神和我自己的祖母联系在一起,因为就像传说中的女神一样,她也取得了一些以她那个时代的标准衡量的非凡成就。她为了爷爷的第二次婚姻把他告上了法庭,并为她的家庭争取到了相当一部分财产。她独自一人在一个小房子里养大了她唯一的儿子,而她的丈夫和他的第二任妻子住在一个相对豪华的房子里。奶奶虽然不会读书写字,但她知道如何独立管理家务。如果说女神是整个文明的母亲,那么我奶奶就是我们家的创造者和保护者。但在大约十岁的时候,我对这位女神的形象受到了我当时认为是致命的攻击。我参加了一个特殊的为期九天的秋季女神崇拜仪式,在这个仪式上,一位权威(字面上)背诵和解释了《神颂》(赞美女神),认为女神是从三位男神——梵天(创造者)、毗瑟奴(保护者)和马哈德夫(毁灭者)——的联合能量中出现的。在我年轻的头脑中,很难调和女神是由三位一体的神铸造的,还是她是一种独立于任何其他来源的宇宙力量。根据我祖母给我讲的故事,卡莉是宇宙的力量,它启动了宇宙时间之轮的运动,也是现象存在和形成的原始冲动。根据这个密宗(仪式)版本的女神崇拜,而时间(或梵语中的kala)“吞噬”创造的所有三个层面的世界(物质宇宙、星体/微妙宇宙和因果宇宙),最后是卡利“吞噬”甚至时间(卡拉)。因此,卡利将是创造和毁灭的原始原因,在这一点上,它可以代表意识和绝对存在。但根据这位男性权威人士的说法,女神的存在是建立在男神的意志和能量之上的。她的角色与这些神所设定的目的相去甚远。我一直想知道哪个版本是正确的,一个人如何才能调和同一位女神的相互矛盾的形象。对当时的年轻人来说,这更多的是和解问题,而不是代表问题。然而,当我作为修辞学的学生开始思考传说和其他古典文本中沉默的主题时,就没有这样的困惑了。例如,当我在古代男性的修辞文本中读到女性时,我知道这些都是女性受男性摆布的形象,正如Culham(在上面的铭文中)所暗示的那样,而不是女性真实的声音。毕竟,几乎没有任何古代女性的作品流传至今。那么问题来了,我们如何看待这些通过别人来到我们面前的人物呢?当我们知道一个给定的描述是由一个明确的动机所驱动的,这个动机是为了战术上的利益而消极地描绘这个主题时,这个问题就变得更加重要了,就像在法庭上一样。西塞罗的《开谕》中克洛迪亚的形象就是一个很好的例子。关于西塞罗的演讲和它的文化政治已经写了很多,我不打算在这篇文章中重复。相反,我想利用这个机会来探讨在恢复和修订工作中的代表性问题。学者们经常想知道恢复历史上沉默的主题的挑战和可能性,通常从伦理角度提出这些问题。然后,挑战不仅仅是关于研究对象的历史准确性或其他方面,而且更重要的是,在随后的文本中(重新)书写它们的行为。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emily Dickinson: What Is Called Thinking at the Edge of Chaos? Relational Selves: Gender and Cultural Differences in Moral Reasoning Late Pound: The Case of Canto CVII The Reproduction of Subjectivity and the Turnover-time of Ideology: Speculating with German Idealism, Marx, and Adorno Toward an Ethics of Speculative Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1