The Global State of Health Care System

Professor Kelly Kingsly
{"title":"The Global State of Health Care System","authors":"Professor Kelly Kingsly","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3663356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, health care has recently known indisputable challenges. Even the strongest nations have seen their supposedly strong health systems crush down. No health organisation has been left un-disrupted with the coming of Covid-19. If even the mighty have fallen what becomes of the weak?<br><br>African countries at independence were organized and financed by governments which provided facilities, personnel and other inputs. By the 1980s, however economic downturn and the embrace of international monetary fund loans with stringent conditionality meant that many governments had to cut public spending on infrastructure and services, including healthcare and education. Consequently, many African governments stopped subsidizing public services and began implementing various costs – recovery measures in public services. The cost recovery era witnessed the introduction of OOP (out-of-pocket) for healthcare services, public water supply and consumables in schools. Thus, since the 1980s and 1990s, OOP by individuals and households have accounted for a larger scale of healthcare expenditure in many African countries of sub-Saharan Africa (1). These payments popularly known as user-fees or the ‘cash and carry’ health system in Ghana are known for raising the cost of healthcare, thus making it un-affordable for a large number of the population. In many sub-Saharan countries, governments rank healthcare relatively low among development priorities (2). For this reason, insufficient resources are allocated to healthcare, including drugs; which is often financed OOP (3)<br><br>Healthcare statistics in sub-Sahara Africa are generally poor. For example, although the region makes up only 11 per cent, of the world’s population; it accounts for é’ per cent of the global disease burden and commands less than 1 per cent of global expenditure (4). Although the WHP suggests thresholds of OOP for health as a guarantee of adequate financial protection is in the region of 15-20 per cent, residents of many African countries spend more (5). For example, OOP spending on health was between 27 – 37 per cent in Ghana in 2012 about 52 per cent in Kenya, 6405-70 per cent in Nigeria in the 1998 – 2008 period: while in South Africa, the government contributes about 42 per cent of all expenditures on health. The remaining 58 per cent is paid by private sources insurance premiums and OOP.<br><br>The United Nations recommends minimum required budgetary allocation to health is 15 per cent, many African countries fall below this minimum in their budgetary allocations. In 2007 more than half of the 53 African countries spent less than $50 per person (as average) on health (6). Of the total expenditure, 30 per cent came from governments, 20 per cent from donors and 50 per cent from private sources of which 71 per cent was paid by patients themselves, the so-called out-of-pocket-payments.<br><br>The dire picture of the healthcare system in the world and particularly in sub-Saharan Africa described above, coupled with Africa’s status as a ‘low-income’ region where poverty is a major barrier to accessing healthcare and underscores the need to rethink the health system.<br><br>To talk of healthcare systems, we must first consider the elements that make up this system. If the target is having a better health system then the individual elements making up the system must be reviewed. Knowing what it is to be what is has been and what it could be, will be a good step forward.","PeriodicalId":360236,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: Government Expenditures & Related Policies eJournal","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: Government Expenditures & Related Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3663356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Globally, health care has recently known indisputable challenges. Even the strongest nations have seen their supposedly strong health systems crush down. No health organisation has been left un-disrupted with the coming of Covid-19. If even the mighty have fallen what becomes of the weak?

African countries at independence were organized and financed by governments which provided facilities, personnel and other inputs. By the 1980s, however economic downturn and the embrace of international monetary fund loans with stringent conditionality meant that many governments had to cut public spending on infrastructure and services, including healthcare and education. Consequently, many African governments stopped subsidizing public services and began implementing various costs – recovery measures in public services. The cost recovery era witnessed the introduction of OOP (out-of-pocket) for healthcare services, public water supply and consumables in schools. Thus, since the 1980s and 1990s, OOP by individuals and households have accounted for a larger scale of healthcare expenditure in many African countries of sub-Saharan Africa (1). These payments popularly known as user-fees or the ‘cash and carry’ health system in Ghana are known for raising the cost of healthcare, thus making it un-affordable for a large number of the population. In many sub-Saharan countries, governments rank healthcare relatively low among development priorities (2). For this reason, insufficient resources are allocated to healthcare, including drugs; which is often financed OOP (3)

Healthcare statistics in sub-Sahara Africa are generally poor. For example, although the region makes up only 11 per cent, of the world’s population; it accounts for é’ per cent of the global disease burden and commands less than 1 per cent of global expenditure (4). Although the WHP suggests thresholds of OOP for health as a guarantee of adequate financial protection is in the region of 15-20 per cent, residents of many African countries spend more (5). For example, OOP spending on health was between 27 – 37 per cent in Ghana in 2012 about 52 per cent in Kenya, 6405-70 per cent in Nigeria in the 1998 – 2008 period: while in South Africa, the government contributes about 42 per cent of all expenditures on health. The remaining 58 per cent is paid by private sources insurance premiums and OOP.

The United Nations recommends minimum required budgetary allocation to health is 15 per cent, many African countries fall below this minimum in their budgetary allocations. In 2007 more than half of the 53 African countries spent less than $50 per person (as average) on health (6). Of the total expenditure, 30 per cent came from governments, 20 per cent from donors and 50 per cent from private sources of which 71 per cent was paid by patients themselves, the so-called out-of-pocket-payments.

The dire picture of the healthcare system in the world and particularly in sub-Saharan Africa described above, coupled with Africa’s status as a ‘low-income’ region where poverty is a major barrier to accessing healthcare and underscores the need to rethink the health system.

To talk of healthcare systems, we must first consider the elements that make up this system. If the target is having a better health system then the individual elements making up the system must be reviewed. Knowing what it is to be what is has been and what it could be, will be a good step forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球卫生保健系统状况
在全球范围内,卫生保健最近面临着无可争辩的挑战。即使是最强大的国家也看到了他们本应强大的卫生系统崩溃。没有一个卫生组织能不受Covid-19到来的影响。如果连强者都倒下了,弱者将何去何从?独立时的非洲国家是由政府组织和资助的,政府提供设施、人员和其他投入。然而,到了上世纪80年代,经济衰退和接受国际货币基金组织(imf)带有严格条件的贷款,意味着许多政府不得不削减基础设施和服务(包括医疗和教育)方面的公共支出。因此,许多非洲国家政府停止了对公共服务的补贴,并开始在公共服务领域实施各种成本回收措施。在成本回收时代,医疗保健服务、公共供水和学校消耗品采用了自费支付模式。因此,自20世纪80年代和90年代以来,在撒哈拉以南非洲的许多非洲国家,个人和家庭的OOP占了更大规模的医疗保健支出(1)。这些支付通常被称为用户费用或加纳的“现付自付”医疗系统,以提高医疗保健成本而闻名,从而使大量人口负担不起。在许多撒哈拉以南的国家,政府将医疗保健排在发展重点的较低位置(2)。因此,分配给医疗保健(包括药品)的资源不足;(3)撒哈拉以南非洲的医疗统计数据普遍较差。例如,尽管该地区仅占世界人口的11%;它占e的每分钱的全球疾病负担和命令不到全球1%的支出(4)。尽管OOP的流泪表明阈值对健康的保证足够的金融保护是在该地区的15 - 20分,许多非洲国家的居民花更多的(5)。例如,OOP卫生开支是2012年在加纳27 - 37%约52%在肯尼亚,尼日利亚6405 - 70在1998 - 2008年期间:而在南非,政府提供了约42%的保健支出。其余的58%由私人来源支付保险费和OOP。联合国建议对保健的最低要求预算拨款为15%,但许多非洲国家的预算拨款低于这一最低要求。2007年,53个非洲国家中有一半以上的国家(平均)人均卫生支出不足50美元(6)。在总支出中,30%来自政府,20%来自捐助者,50%来自私人来源,其中71%由患者自己支付,即所谓的自付付款。上文所述的世界卫生系统,特别是撒哈拉以南非洲地区卫生系统的糟糕状况,加上非洲作为“低收入”地区的地位,贫困是获得卫生保健的主要障碍,这凸显了重新思考卫生系统的必要性。要谈论医疗保健系统,我们必须首先考虑组成这个系统的要素。如果目标是拥有更好的卫生系统,那么必须审查构成该系统的各个要素。知道什么是过去,什么是未来,这将是向前迈出的一大步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of One Parent Family Payment Reforms on the Labour Market Outcomes of Lone Parents The Effect of Retirement Age on Labor Productivity: A Macroeconomic Approach Auditul extern al fondurilor destinate siguranţei şi apărării naţionale (External Audit of Funds for National Security and Defense) Revisiting Retirement and Social Security Claiming Decisions Medicaid Expansion and Medical Liability Costs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1