Do Retired Americans Annuitize Too Little? Trends in the Share of Annuitized Income

B. Bosworth, Gary T. Burtless, Mattan Alalouf
{"title":"Do Retired Americans Annuitize Too Little? Trends in the Share of Annuitized Income","authors":"B. Bosworth, Gary T. Burtless, Mattan Alalouf","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2622119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the importance of annuity-like income as a share of total money income received by aged families. The analysis considers the aged (62+) population as a whole as well as different parts of the aged families’ income distribution during the period from the early 1980s through 2009. We use survey data from 1983 through 2009 from the March Current Population Survey (March CPS) and the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The total income amounts reported in the files are compared with data in the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA). We calculate the family income consisting of annuitized income flows (primarily Social Security and pensions) and measure it as a share of families’ total money income. We also expand the definition of both annuitized and non-annuitized income to include income flows not captured in the surveys, namely, health insurance subsidies and the housing services received by homeowners. Finally, we consider the potential impact on aged families if they were to convert their wealth into private annuities. The paper finds that: - Despite the shift from defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC) retirement plans, there is little evidence that the annuity-like income share of total income has fallen for aged families – and, in particular, for low-income aged families – over the past three decades. - This basic result remains unchanged when we consider more comprehensive income definitions and when we focus on aged families with retired heads of family.N - Nonetheless, many middle- and high-income aged families would experience a sizeable increase in monthly income if they annuitized their wealth. The policy implications of the findings are: - Concerns that reduced rates of annuitization will lead retirees to spend down their assets at a too-rapid rate seem overblown or at least premature; there is little evidence that the share of income derived from annuity-like income sources has declined. - Contrary to a widespread fear, the shift from DB to DC workplace pensions has not reduced the share of retirement income that consists of relatively secure, annuity-like income flows that will last as long as aged breadwinners and their spouses survive.","PeriodicalId":284824,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Retirement Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"204 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Retirement Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2622119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This paper examines the importance of annuity-like income as a share of total money income received by aged families. The analysis considers the aged (62+) population as a whole as well as different parts of the aged families’ income distribution during the period from the early 1980s through 2009. We use survey data from 1983 through 2009 from the March Current Population Survey (March CPS) and the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The total income amounts reported in the files are compared with data in the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA). We calculate the family income consisting of annuitized income flows (primarily Social Security and pensions) and measure it as a share of families’ total money income. We also expand the definition of both annuitized and non-annuitized income to include income flows not captured in the surveys, namely, health insurance subsidies and the housing services received by homeowners. Finally, we consider the potential impact on aged families if they were to convert their wealth into private annuities. The paper finds that: - Despite the shift from defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC) retirement plans, there is little evidence that the annuity-like income share of total income has fallen for aged families – and, in particular, for low-income aged families – over the past three decades. - This basic result remains unchanged when we consider more comprehensive income definitions and when we focus on aged families with retired heads of family.N - Nonetheless, many middle- and high-income aged families would experience a sizeable increase in monthly income if they annuitized their wealth. The policy implications of the findings are: - Concerns that reduced rates of annuitization will lead retirees to spend down their assets at a too-rapid rate seem overblown or at least premature; there is little evidence that the share of income derived from annuity-like income sources has declined. - Contrary to a widespread fear, the shift from DB to DC workplace pensions has not reduced the share of retirement income that consists of relatively secure, annuity-like income flows that will last as long as aged breadwinners and their spouses survive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国退休人员养老金太少了吗?年化收入份额的趋势
本文考察了年金类收入在老年家庭货币总收入中所占比例的重要性。该分析考虑了从20世纪80年代初到2009年这段时间里,62岁以上的人口作为一个整体,以及老年家庭的不同部分的收入分配。我们使用1983年至2009年的调查数据,这些数据来自3月份的当前人口调查(March CPS)和消费者财务调查(SCF)。文件中报告的总收入金额与国民收入和产品账户(NIPA)中的数据进行了比较。我们计算由年金化收入流(主要是社会保障和养老金)组成的家庭收入,并将其作为家庭总货币收入的一部分进行衡量。我们还扩大了年金化和非年金化收入的定义,以包括调查中未包含的收入流,即健康保险补贴和房主获得的住房服务。最后,我们考虑了如果老年家庭将其财富转换为私人年金对他们的潜在影响。本文发现:尽管退休计划从固定收益(DB)向固定缴款(DC)转变,但几乎没有证据表明,在过去三十年中,老年家庭——尤其是低收入老年家庭——的年金类收入占总收入的比例有所下降。-当我们考虑更全面的收入定义时,当我们关注的是户主退休的老年家庭时,这一基本结果不会改变。N -尽管如此,许多中等收入和高收入的老年家庭如果将他们的财富进行年金化,他们的月收入将大幅增加。研究结果的政策含义是:-对降低年金化率将导致退休人员过快花掉其资产的担忧似乎被夸大了,或者至少是不成熟的;几乎没有证据表明来自年金类收入来源的收入份额有所下降。-与普遍的担忧相反,从固定缴款到固定缴款的工作场所养老金的转变并没有减少退休收入的份额,这种收入是由相对安全的、类似年金的收入流组成的,只要年迈的养家者及其配偶存活,这种收入流就会持续下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Are Older Workers Moving Less While Working Longer? Need to Increase the Public Servants’ Retirement Age to 65 in Uganda: Policy Report. How Best to Annuitize Defined Contribution Assets? How Much Income Do Retirees Actually Have? Evaluating the Evidence from Five National Datasets Family Transfers with Retirement-Aged Adults in the United States: Kin Availability, Wealth Differentials, Geographic Proximity, Gender, and Racial Disparities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1