When Coercive Economies Fail: The Political Economy of the Us South after the Boll Weevil

J. Feigenbaum, Soumyajit Mazumder, Cory B. Smith
{"title":"When Coercive Economies Fail: The Political Economy of the Us South after the Boll Weevil","authors":"J. Feigenbaum, Soumyajit Mazumder, Cory B. Smith","doi":"10.3386/w27161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do coercive societies respond to negative economic shocks? We explore this question in the early 20th-Century United States South. Since before the nation's founding, cotton cultivation formed the politics and institutions in the South, including the development of slavery, the lack of democratic institutions, and intergroup relations between whites and blacks. We leverage the natural experiment generated by the boll weevil infestation from 1892-1922, which disrupted cotton production in the region. Panel difference-in-differences results provide evidence that Southern society became less violent and repressive in response to this shock with fewer lynchings and less Confederate monument construction. Cross-sectional results leveraging spatial variation in the infestation and historical cotton specialization show that affected counties had less KKK activity, higher non-white voter registration, and were less likely to experience contentious politics in the form of protests during the 1960s. To assess mechanisms, we show that the reductions in coercion were responses to African American out-migration. Even in a context of antidemocratic institutions, ordinary people can retain political power through the ability to ``vote with their feet.''","PeriodicalId":443031,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Political Institutions eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Political Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w27161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

How do coercive societies respond to negative economic shocks? We explore this question in the early 20th-Century United States South. Since before the nation's founding, cotton cultivation formed the politics and institutions in the South, including the development of slavery, the lack of democratic institutions, and intergroup relations between whites and blacks. We leverage the natural experiment generated by the boll weevil infestation from 1892-1922, which disrupted cotton production in the region. Panel difference-in-differences results provide evidence that Southern society became less violent and repressive in response to this shock with fewer lynchings and less Confederate monument construction. Cross-sectional results leveraging spatial variation in the infestation and historical cotton specialization show that affected counties had less KKK activity, higher non-white voter registration, and were less likely to experience contentious politics in the form of protests during the 1960s. To assess mechanisms, we show that the reductions in coercion were responses to African American out-migration. Even in a context of antidemocratic institutions, ordinary people can retain political power through the ability to ``vote with their feet.''
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当强制经济失败:棉铃象鼻虫之后的美国南方政治经济
强制性社会如何应对负面的经济冲击?我们在20世纪初的美国南部探索了这个问题。自建国之前,棉花种植就形成了南方的政治和制度,包括奴隶制的发展、民主制度的缺乏以及白人和黑人之间的群体关系。我们利用了1892年至1922年棉铃象鼻虫侵扰产生的自然实验,这扰乱了该地区的棉花生产。小组差异的结果提供了证据,表明南方社会对这种冲击的反应变得不那么暴力和压抑,私刑和邦联纪念碑的建设也减少了。利用侵扰和历史棉花专业化的空间变化的横断面结果表明,受影响的县有较少的三k党活动,较高的非白人选民登记,并且在20世纪60年代不太可能经历以抗议形式出现的有争议的政治。为了评估机制,我们表明胁迫的减少是对非裔美国人外迁的反应。即使在反民主制度的背景下,普通人也可以通过“用脚投票”的能力保持政治权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Fall in Shadow Banking and the Slow U.S. Recovery Leviathan's Offer: State-Building with Elite Compensation in Early Medieval China Assessing the double materiality of climate risks in the EU economy and banking sector Local Journalism under Private Equity Ownership Is Flood Risk Priced in Bank Returns?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1