Documenting Harassment, Sexism, and Misogyny in Digital Feminist Spaces

Kaitlynn Mendes, J. Ringrose, J. Keller
{"title":"Documenting Harassment, Sexism, and Misogyny in Digital Feminist Spaces","authors":"Kaitlynn Mendes, J. Ringrose, J. Keller","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190697846.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 presents results from a qualitative content analysis and thematic textual analysis drawn from four case studies: Hollaback!, Everyday Sexism, Who Needs Feminism?, and #BeenRapedNeverReported. The chapter presents one of the first attempts to analyze these popular feminist campaigns by answering the question of what kinds of experiences of harassment, misogyny, and rape culture the public are sharing on feminist digital platforms. We begin here to develop a key argument that digital feminist activism is far more complex and nuanced than one might initially expect, and is used in a multitude of ways, for many purposes, drawing on a range of different conventions or vernacular practices. Taking a cue from critical technology studies, we attend to emerging vernacular practices that we argue have been shaped by platform architecture, affordances, and conventions, which work to simultaneously encourage and discourage certain narratives from certain groups of people.","PeriodicalId":155046,"journal":{"name":"Digital Feminist Activism","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Feminist Activism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190697846.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 3 presents results from a qualitative content analysis and thematic textual analysis drawn from four case studies: Hollaback!, Everyday Sexism, Who Needs Feminism?, and #BeenRapedNeverReported. The chapter presents one of the first attempts to analyze these popular feminist campaigns by answering the question of what kinds of experiences of harassment, misogyny, and rape culture the public are sharing on feminist digital platforms. We begin here to develop a key argument that digital feminist activism is far more complex and nuanced than one might initially expect, and is used in a multitude of ways, for many purposes, drawing on a range of different conventions or vernacular practices. Taking a cue from critical technology studies, we attend to emerging vernacular practices that we argue have been shaped by platform architecture, affordances, and conventions, which work to simultaneously encourage and discourage certain narratives from certain groups of people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记录数字女权主义空间中的骚扰、性别歧视和厌女症
第三章给出了定性内容分析和专题文本分析的结果,这些分析来自四个案例:每日性别歧视,谁需要女权主义?,以及#被强奸从未报告过。本章通过回答公众在女权主义数字平台上分享了什么样的骚扰、厌女症和强奸文化的经历,提出了对这些流行的女权主义运动进行分析的首次尝试之一。我们从这里开始发展一个关键的论点,即数字女权主义行动主义比人们最初想象的要复杂和微妙得多,并以多种方式用于许多目的,借鉴了一系列不同的惯例或本土实践。从关键技术研究中得到提示,我们关注新兴的本土实践,我们认为这些实践是由平台架构、功能支持和惯例塑造的,它们同时鼓励和阻止来自特定人群的某些叙述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hashtag Feminism Feminist Organizers’ Experiences of Activism Teen Feminist Digital Activisms Twitter as a Pedagogical Platform Documenting Harassment, Sexism, and Misogyny in Digital Feminist Spaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1