Four Spectres of Bioethics

J. Mcmillan
{"title":"Four Spectres of Bioethics","authors":"J. Mcmillan","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199603756.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bioethics continues to be frustrated by dubious methodological habits and assumptions that it would be much better off without. This chapter describes four of the five methodological spectres that continue to frustrate bioethics. The first is the ‘moral mantra mistake’, which is the problematic way in which principles can be recited as if their mere utterance justified a moral position. The ‘tedious theory tendency’ refers to the assumption that moral theories are the route by which we can understand how we reason about ethics. Theoretically driven approaches to bioethics overdetermine the answer to an ethical question, so they are like a ‘sausage machine’ that converts a range of substances into a single output. Because of its interdisciplinary nature, there is a tendency for some disciplines to plead that their discipline is fact crucial for bioethics, and that idea is what I call ‘the snooty specialist spectre’.","PeriodicalId":113930,"journal":{"name":"The Methods of Bioethics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Methods of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199603756.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioethics continues to be frustrated by dubious methodological habits and assumptions that it would be much better off without. This chapter describes four of the five methodological spectres that continue to frustrate bioethics. The first is the ‘moral mantra mistake’, which is the problematic way in which principles can be recited as if their mere utterance justified a moral position. The ‘tedious theory tendency’ refers to the assumption that moral theories are the route by which we can understand how we reason about ethics. Theoretically driven approaches to bioethics overdetermine the answer to an ethical question, so they are like a ‘sausage machine’ that converts a range of substances into a single output. Because of its interdisciplinary nature, there is a tendency for some disciplines to plead that their discipline is fact crucial for bioethics, and that idea is what I call ‘the snooty specialist spectre’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生命伦理学的四个幽灵
生物伦理学继续受到可疑的方法论习惯和假设的挫折,这些习惯和假设认为没有它会好得多。这一章描述了继续阻碍生命伦理学的五种方法论幽灵中的四种。第一个是“道德咒语错误”,这是一种有问题的方式,在这种方式中,原则可以被背诵,就好像它们的话语证明了道德立场。“乏味的理论倾向”指的是这样一种假设,即道德理论是我们理解如何对伦理进行推理的途径。理论驱动的生物伦理学方法过度决定了伦理问题的答案,因此它们就像一台“香肠机”,将一系列物质转化为单一的输出。由于其跨学科的性质,有些学科倾向于辩称,他们的学科对生命伦理学至关重要,这种想法就是我所说的“傲慢的专家幽灵”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empirical, Socratic Bioethics The Fact/Value Spectre Four Spectres of Bioethics Speculative Argument and Bioethics What It Is to Reason about Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1