Dose Evaluation of Head CT Scans Using Phantom for Optimization Protocols

Santos Fernanda Stephanie, Mourão Arnaldo Prata
{"title":"Dose Evaluation of Head CT Scans Using Phantom for Optimization Protocols","authors":"Santos Fernanda Stephanie, Mourão Arnaldo Prata","doi":"10.23937/2572-3235.1510099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computed Tomography (CT) scans promote a higher dose deposition than conventional radiology exams. These tests contribute significantly to the increase in the patient and collective dose, being a public health concern worldwide. There is a great need to improve protocols to seek lower doses while maintaining the diagnostic image quality. The development of phantoms allows the testing of different acquisition protocols. For this, the phantoms must present an absorption characteristic of the X-ray beam similar to the represented patient. In this study, two CT head phantoms were used, the standard head phantom and another with smaller volume. The objects are cylinders with 16 cm (standard adult) and 12 cm in diameter and 15 cm in length, made of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA). Tests of acquisition protocols were performed on a GE CT scanner, LightSpeed VCT model with 64 channels. The central slice of the phantoms was irradiated successively, and using a pencil ionization chamber, measurements of CT air kerma index in PMMA (C k,PMMA,100 ) were performed. From these results, the CT Dose Index values weighted and volumetric (CTDI w , CTDI vol ) were obtained for 10 cm scans of the central region of the head phantoms, in helical mode. The scans were performed using a voltage of 120 kV value and load (mA.s). Dose values varied from 17.52 mGy to 24.83 mGy. The highest recorded dose value was 24.83 mGy for the smaller head phantom and 19.96 mGy for the standard head phantom. The results obtained allowed to evaluate that, for the generation of images with the same diagnostic objective, the volumetric dose index showed a higher dose value in the 12 cm phantom, corresponding to a head with less volume, compared to the value measured in the standard head phantom.","PeriodicalId":306475,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiology and Imaging Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiology and Imaging Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3235.1510099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computed Tomography (CT) scans promote a higher dose deposition than conventional radiology exams. These tests contribute significantly to the increase in the patient and collective dose, being a public health concern worldwide. There is a great need to improve protocols to seek lower doses while maintaining the diagnostic image quality. The development of phantoms allows the testing of different acquisition protocols. For this, the phantoms must present an absorption characteristic of the X-ray beam similar to the represented patient. In this study, two CT head phantoms were used, the standard head phantom and another with smaller volume. The objects are cylinders with 16 cm (standard adult) and 12 cm in diameter and 15 cm in length, made of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA). Tests of acquisition protocols were performed on a GE CT scanner, LightSpeed VCT model with 64 channels. The central slice of the phantoms was irradiated successively, and using a pencil ionization chamber, measurements of CT air kerma index in PMMA (C k,PMMA,100 ) were performed. From these results, the CT Dose Index values weighted and volumetric (CTDI w , CTDI vol ) were obtained for 10 cm scans of the central region of the head phantoms, in helical mode. The scans were performed using a voltage of 120 kV value and load (mA.s). Dose values varied from 17.52 mGy to 24.83 mGy. The highest recorded dose value was 24.83 mGy for the smaller head phantom and 19.96 mGy for the standard head phantom. The results obtained allowed to evaluate that, for the generation of images with the same diagnostic objective, the volumetric dose index showed a higher dose value in the 12 cm phantom, corresponding to a head with less volume, compared to the value measured in the standard head phantom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于幻影的头部CT扫描剂量评估优化方案
计算机断层扫描(CT)比常规放射学检查促进更高剂量的沉积。这些检测大大增加了患者和集体剂量,成为全世界关注的公共卫生问题。有很大的需要改进方案,以寻求更低的剂量,同时保持诊断图像质量。幻影的开发允许测试不同的获取协议。为此,幽灵必须表现出与所代表的病人相似的x射线束吸收特性。本研究使用两个CT头影,标准头影和体积较小的头影。这些物品是圆柱体,直径为16厘米(标准成人),直径为12厘米,长度为15厘米,由聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)制成。在64通道的GE CT扫描仪LightSpeed VCT模型上进行了采集协议测试。将模型中央切片依次照射,利用铅笔电离室测量PMMA (ck,PMMA,100)中的CT空气热指数。根据这些结果,在螺旋模式下,获得头部幻影中心区域10厘米扫描的CT剂量指数加权值和体积(CTDI w, CTDI vol)。扫描使用120 kV电压值和负载(mA.s)进行。剂量值从17.52毫戈瑞到24.83毫戈瑞不等。记录的最高剂量值较小的头影为24.83 mGy,标准头影为19.96 mGy。所获得的结果允许评估,对于产生具有相同诊断目标的图像,体积剂量指数在12 cm幻象中显示更高的剂量值,对应于体积较小的头部,与标准头部幻象中测量的值相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Brain MRI Findings between Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Non-Dementia Psychiatric Disorders in the Elderly Anatomical Changes of Brain of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients: Viewed from MRI Outcome of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Technique on Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI): Meta-Analysis Renal Pedicle Injury: A Case Report Radon Gas Potential Hazards Awareness among Undergraduate Students and Staff of a College of Health Sciences in South-East, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1