Radioactive Revenues: Financial Flows between Uranium Mining Companies and African Governments

Albert ten Kate, J. Wilde-Ramsing
{"title":"Radioactive Revenues: Financial Flows between Uranium Mining Companies and African Governments","authors":"Albert ten Kate, J. Wilde-Ramsing","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1777084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For African countries, the revenue derived from the uranium mining operations of multinational corporations is despite the high price of uranium minimal, uncertain and volatile. The financial agreements that these countries make with the uranium producers regarding their share in the profits are the primary reason for this state of affairs. These contracts are often the result of negotiations that take place behind closed doors. This report analyses the financial aspects of uranium mining in the main African uranium producing countries Namibia, Niger, Malawi and South Africa and examines the activities of the four largest multinational uranium mining companies in Africa: the French AREVA group, the English-Australian Rio Tinto, the Australian Paladin Energy and the South-Africa-based AngloGold Ashanti. Currently, one-fifth of all uranium worldwide is mined in Africa, and production is expected to double in the next two years. Nevertheless, uranium mining remains an uncertain source of revenue for African countries given the unstable price of uranium and the dependence on corporate profits. The primary sources of revenue from uranium mining for African countries are corporate income taxes and royalties (a percentage of uranium sales). But the financial arrangements between multinational corporations and African governments vary widely. For example, Niger has acquired the right to sell a portion of the uranium produced itself rather than relying on AREVA to do so. In addition, Nigers royalties rate for uranium is higher than that in Namibia. Paladin Energy in Malawi and AngloGold Ashanti in South Africa pay less tax and other incentives per kilogram of uranium sold than Rio Tinto in Namibia and AREVA in Niger. The multinational corporations are also allowed to write off investments at an expedited rate, further reducing the value and certainty of revenues to host states. Over the past five years, total revenues received by host states amounted to only approximately 17% of the value of the uranium sold.","PeriodicalId":213910,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets: Regional Perspective eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets: Regional Perspective eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1777084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

For African countries, the revenue derived from the uranium mining operations of multinational corporations is despite the high price of uranium minimal, uncertain and volatile. The financial agreements that these countries make with the uranium producers regarding their share in the profits are the primary reason for this state of affairs. These contracts are often the result of negotiations that take place behind closed doors. This report analyses the financial aspects of uranium mining in the main African uranium producing countries Namibia, Niger, Malawi and South Africa and examines the activities of the four largest multinational uranium mining companies in Africa: the French AREVA group, the English-Australian Rio Tinto, the Australian Paladin Energy and the South-Africa-based AngloGold Ashanti. Currently, one-fifth of all uranium worldwide is mined in Africa, and production is expected to double in the next two years. Nevertheless, uranium mining remains an uncertain source of revenue for African countries given the unstable price of uranium and the dependence on corporate profits. The primary sources of revenue from uranium mining for African countries are corporate income taxes and royalties (a percentage of uranium sales). But the financial arrangements between multinational corporations and African governments vary widely. For example, Niger has acquired the right to sell a portion of the uranium produced itself rather than relying on AREVA to do so. In addition, Nigers royalties rate for uranium is higher than that in Namibia. Paladin Energy in Malawi and AngloGold Ashanti in South Africa pay less tax and other incentives per kilogram of uranium sold than Rio Tinto in Namibia and AREVA in Niger. The multinational corporations are also allowed to write off investments at an expedited rate, further reducing the value and certainty of revenues to host states. Over the past five years, total revenues received by host states amounted to only approximately 17% of the value of the uranium sold.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射性收入:铀矿公司与非洲政府之间的资金流动
对非洲国家来说,尽管铀的价格很高,但跨国公司的铀矿开采业务所获得的收入很少、不确定和不稳定。这些国家与铀生产商就利润分成达成的金融协议是造成这种状况的主要原因。这些合同通常是闭门谈判的结果。本报告分析了非洲主要铀生产国纳米比亚、尼日尔、马拉维和南非铀矿开采的财务方面,并审查了非洲四大跨国铀矿公司的活动:法国的阿海珐集团、英澳合资的力拓集团、澳大利亚的帕拉丁能源公司和总部设在南非的盎格鲁-阿尚蒂公司。目前,全世界五分之一的铀是在非洲开采的,预计未来两年产量将翻一番。然而,由于铀的价格不稳定和对公司利润的依赖,铀矿开采仍然是非洲国家不确定的收入来源。非洲国家铀矿开采收入的主要来源是公司所得税和特许权使用费(铀销售额的百分比)。但跨国公司和非洲政府之间的财务安排差异很大。例如,尼日尔已经获得了出售自己生产的部分铀的权利,而不是依赖阿海珐。此外,尼日尔的铀开采权使用费也高于纳米比亚。与纳米比亚的力拓和尼日尔的阿海珐相比,马拉维的帕拉丁能源公司和南非的AngloGold Ashanti公司每出售一公斤铀所支付的税收和其他奖励要少。跨国公司还被允许以更快的速度注销投资,这进一步降低了东道国收入的价值和确定性。在过去五年中,东道国获得的总收入仅占铀销售价值的17%左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factor models for Chinese A-shares Making a Mundane Ceremony Into a Meaningful Organizational Ritual –Some Suggestions for Re-Design of Ribbon-Cutting Ceremonies of Overseas Manufacturing Projects Exporting and Productivity: Evidence for Egypt and Morocco The Cointegration Relationship and Causal Link of Internet Penetration and Broadband Subscription on Economic Growth: Evidence from ASEAN Countries The Digital Economy in Southeast and South Asia: Towards Mutually Beneficial Cooperation with Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1