Dissecting chirping patterns of invasive Tweeter flocks in the German Twitter forest

Q1 Social Sciences Online Social Networks and Media Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100228
Jan Ludwig Reubold , Stephan Escher , Johannes Pflugmacher , Thorsten Strufe
{"title":"Dissecting chirping patterns of invasive Tweeter flocks in the German Twitter forest","authors":"Jan Ludwig Reubold ,&nbsp;Stephan Escher ,&nbsp;Johannes Pflugmacher ,&nbsp;Thorsten Strufe","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Twitter as a platform is used for news dissemination, with high volumes of campaigning and populism. This situation coincides with the growth of audiences who embrace social media as their primary news source. In general, effects like the deterioration of political education, misinformation, or ideological segregation then arguably represent a tremendous risk for democratic societies.</p><p>We analyze a comprehensive data set of the German-speaking Twitter community – a concise, well-defined Twitter population – to understand the extent and form of consumption of controversial news.</p><p>Our results affirm a high interest of German Twitter users in daily news and corresponding discussions. In-depth studies on the behavior, including tweeting- and grouping patterns, revealed the emergence of a new, more self-assured form of echo chambers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twitter as a platform is used for news dissemination, with high volumes of campaigning and populism. This situation coincides with the growth of audiences who embrace social media as their primary news source. In general, effects like the deterioration of political education, misinformation, or ideological segregation then arguably represent a tremendous risk for democratic societies.

We analyze a comprehensive data set of the German-speaking Twitter community – a concise, well-defined Twitter population – to understand the extent and form of consumption of controversial news.

Our results affirm a high interest of German Twitter users in daily news and corresponding discussions. In-depth studies on the behavior, including tweeting- and grouping patterns, revealed the emergence of a new, more self-assured form of echo chambers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖析德国推特森林中入侵的推特鸟群的鸣叫模式
Twitter作为新闻传播的平台,有大量的竞选和民粹主义。这种情况与将社交媒体作为主要新闻来源的受众的增长不谋而合。总的来说,政治教育的恶化、错误信息或意识形态隔离等影响可以说对民主社会构成了巨大的风险。我们分析了德语推特社区的综合数据集——一个简洁、定义明确的推特人群——以了解有争议新闻的消费程度和形式。我们的研究结果证实了德国Twitter用户对每日新闻和相应讨论的高度兴趣。对这种行为的深入研究,包括发推特和分组模式,揭示了一种新的、更自信的回声室形式的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
How does user-generated content on Social Media affect stock predictions? A case study on GameStop Measuring centralization of online platforms through size and interconnection of communities Crowdsourcing the Mitigation of disinformation and misinformation: The case of spontaneous community-based moderation on Reddit GASCOM: Graph-based Attentive Semantic Context Modeling for Online Conversation Understanding The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1