Grand duke Vladimir and January 9 (22), 1905.

K. Kremenetsky
{"title":"Grand duke Vladimir and January 9 (22), 1905.","authors":"K. Kremenetsky","doi":"10.18384/2310-676x-2022-2-69-80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The paper analyses two interviews by Grand Duke Vladimir to the American newspapers at January 1905.Methodology. The article considers the media campaign against the Grand Duke Vladimir which was a part of media war waged mostly by the British newspapers during the Russo-Japanese war. Two interviews of grand Duke Vladimir to the American papers were an attempt by Russian government to convey the official Russian position on the events of January 1905 to the American public. The article considers the reviews and comments by British and Russian media.Results. British newspapers made Grand Duke Vladimir the scapegoat of tragic events of January 9 (22) in Petersburg. His interviews were an important component of the official reaction to these events. Thus, Russian government demonstrated to the international and domestic audience that it remains in full control and can rely on loyalty of the army. The event of January 9 (22) was explained as a socialist riot suppressed by action of the military. Bystanders were seen as innocent collateral victims of the events. Vladimir finger pointed to the defamation campaign of western, mostly British, papers. Opinion of the Grand Duke Vladimir was similar to the published views of other contemporaries. Measures to maintain law and order were important for the further development in the imperial capital.Research implications. This analysis helps to establish a more complex and balanced view of the events of January 1905 in Petersburg. Lessons of the January riot were learned by both the government and the revolutionaries.","PeriodicalId":389297,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (History and Political Science)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (History and Political Science)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676x-2022-2-69-80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The paper analyses two interviews by Grand Duke Vladimir to the American newspapers at January 1905.Methodology. The article considers the media campaign against the Grand Duke Vladimir which was a part of media war waged mostly by the British newspapers during the Russo-Japanese war. Two interviews of grand Duke Vladimir to the American papers were an attempt by Russian government to convey the official Russian position on the events of January 1905 to the American public. The article considers the reviews and comments by British and Russian media.Results. British newspapers made Grand Duke Vladimir the scapegoat of tragic events of January 9 (22) in Petersburg. His interviews were an important component of the official reaction to these events. Thus, Russian government demonstrated to the international and domestic audience that it remains in full control and can rely on loyalty of the army. The event of January 9 (22) was explained as a socialist riot suppressed by action of the military. Bystanders were seen as innocent collateral victims of the events. Vladimir finger pointed to the defamation campaign of western, mostly British, papers. Opinion of the Grand Duke Vladimir was similar to the published views of other contemporaries. Measures to maintain law and order were important for the further development in the imperial capital.Research implications. This analysis helps to establish a more complex and balanced view of the events of January 1905 in Petersburg. Lessons of the January riot were learned by both the government and the revolutionaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弗拉基米尔大公和1905年1月9日(22日)
的目标。本文分析了弗拉基米尔大公1905年1月对美国报纸的两次采访。这篇文章认为,在日俄战争期间,主要由英国报纸发动的媒体战争的一部分,针对弗拉基米尔大公的媒体运动。弗拉基米尔大公接受了两次美国报纸的采访,这是俄罗斯政府试图向美国公众传达俄罗斯对1905年1月事件的官方立场。文章考虑了英国和俄罗斯媒体的评论和评论。英国报纸把弗拉基米尔大公当作1月9日(22日)彼得堡悲剧事件的替罪羊。他的采访是官方对这些事件反应的重要组成部分。因此,俄罗斯政府向国际和国内观众表明,它仍然完全控制,可以依靠军队的忠诚。1月9日(22日)的事件被解释为一场被军队镇压的社会主义暴乱。旁观者被视为事件的无辜附带受害者。弗拉基米尔的手指指向了西方报纸(主要是英国报纸)的诽谤运动。弗拉基米尔大公的观点与其他同时代人发表的观点相似。维持法律和秩序的措施对帝国首都的进一步发展至关重要。研究的意义。这种分析有助于对1905年1月发生在彼得堡的事件建立一种更为复杂和平衡的看法。政府和革命者都吸取了一月暴动的教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
«Prague spring» or «color revolution»? (Evolution of the official evaluation of the Czechoslovak events in 1968) Indian National Congress in the years of the Curzon’s government (1899–1905): problems of development Social deviations in the USSR in the period of the Great Patriotic War: from adultery to high treason The policy of the government of Alexander III in soviet history textbooks for higher education Milestones in the evolution of regional representative government in the Rostov region (1985–2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1