Transforming the Public University: Market Citizenship and Higher Education Regulatory Projects

Kanishka Jayasuriya
{"title":"Transforming the Public University: Market Citizenship and Higher Education Regulatory Projects","authors":"Kanishka Jayasuriya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2353263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper explores the shifts within the mass higher education and its governance over the last three decades. Mass higher education has changed substantially in tandem with the broader changes associated with the social and political compromises over the last few decades. The crisis and transformation of the public university needs to be understood in this context. The paper seeks to analyse the transformation of the public university as it relates to broader state and governance projects. It attempts to focus on the crucial shift from the 80s onwards with the emergence of new notions of market citizenship, bringing with it what has been referred to as ‘structured opportunity markets’ in higher education. These notions of market citizenship are given shape through an emerging higher education regulatory state, now governed by a range of formal and informal instruments including measures to enhance inclusion and participation within the market. It is these regulatory projects that develop and give legitimacy to the higher education market. Consequently the development of the regulatory state and market-making has been deeply intertwined. In conclusion, we argue that the ‘public’ university does not disappear as such, but is reconstituted within these new regulatory arrangements and projects. We illustrate this argument with reference to recent initiatives in the Australian higher education sectors, such as the Bradley Report and the establishment of TESQA.","PeriodicalId":113748,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2353263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Paper explores the shifts within the mass higher education and its governance over the last three decades. Mass higher education has changed substantially in tandem with the broader changes associated with the social and political compromises over the last few decades. The crisis and transformation of the public university needs to be understood in this context. The paper seeks to analyse the transformation of the public university as it relates to broader state and governance projects. It attempts to focus on the crucial shift from the 80s onwards with the emergence of new notions of market citizenship, bringing with it what has been referred to as ‘structured opportunity markets’ in higher education. These notions of market citizenship are given shape through an emerging higher education regulatory state, now governed by a range of formal and informal instruments including measures to enhance inclusion and participation within the market. It is these regulatory projects that develop and give legitimacy to the higher education market. Consequently the development of the regulatory state and market-making has been deeply intertwined. In conclusion, we argue that the ‘public’ university does not disappear as such, but is reconstituted within these new regulatory arrangements and projects. We illustrate this argument with reference to recent initiatives in the Australian higher education sectors, such as the Bradley Report and the establishment of TESQA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公立大学转型:市场公民与高等教育监管项目
论文探讨了过去三十年来大众高等教育及其治理的变化。在过去的几十年里,随着社会和政治妥协带来的更广泛的变化,大众高等教育发生了实质性的变化。公立大学的危机与转型需要在这样的背景下理解。本文试图分析公立大学的转型,因为它涉及到更广泛的国家和治理项目。它试图关注自80年代以来随着市场公民新概念的出现而发生的关键转变,随之而来的是高等教育中所谓的“结构化机会市场”。这些市场公民的概念是通过新兴的高等教育监管国家形成的,现在由一系列正式和非正式的文书管理,包括加强市场包容和参与的措施。正是这些监管项目发展并赋予了高等教育市场合法性。因此,监管国家和做市商的发展已经深深交织在一起。总之,我们认为“公立”大学并没有就此消失,而是在这些新的监管安排和项目中重组。我们引用澳大利亚高等教育部门最近的举措来说明这一论点,例如布拉德利报告和TESQA的建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cost of Public Financing: Crowding Out in the Context of Political Campaigns Targeting Interacting Agents I divari infrastrutturali in Italia: una misurazione caso per caso [Infrastructure Gaps in Italy: A Case-by-Case Measurement] Do 'Dig Once' and Permitting Policies Improve Fiber Availability? Opioids and Organs: How Overdoses Affect the Supply and Demand for Organ Transplants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1