Environmental Assessment of Fluctuating Residential Electricity Demand

Julien Walzberg, Thomas Dandres, Nicolas Merveille, M. Cheriet, R. Samson
{"title":"Environmental Assessment of Fluctuating Residential Electricity Demand","authors":"Julien Walzberg, Thomas Dandres, Nicolas Merveille, M. Cheriet, R. Samson","doi":"10.1109/STICT.2019.8789377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Including dynamic aspects in the environmental assessment of power systems allows computing the environmental benefits of demand-side management strategies for the smart grid which could not be assessed with static data such as shifting part of the demand from one period to another. Several methodological approaches have been developed in life cycle assessment to account for dynamic aspects, but none has given much attention to the demand side of the equation. However, demand is also prone to fluctuate in time and its misrepresentation may lead to additional errors. In this study, a stochastic approach was applied to model the fluctuating residential power demand of Canadians' homes. An hourly and a yearly average electricity mix were then used to compute the environmental impacts of the hourly or yearly average homes' electricity demand. Finally, an approach combining an average and a marginal hourly electricity mix was then proposed to assess the benefits of a simple demand side management strategy: the shifting of homes' dryers loads up to two hours later than usual. Results show that assuming a constant demand or electricity mix both leads to errors which may be as high as 150% depending on the period of the month assessed. Moreover, using an hourly average electricity mix to set up the demand side strategy increases climate change impact by 0.6% whereas using a marginal mix decreases climate change impact by 10%.","PeriodicalId":209175,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Sustainability through ICT Summit (StICT)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Sustainability through ICT Summit (StICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STICT.2019.8789377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Including dynamic aspects in the environmental assessment of power systems allows computing the environmental benefits of demand-side management strategies for the smart grid which could not be assessed with static data such as shifting part of the demand from one period to another. Several methodological approaches have been developed in life cycle assessment to account for dynamic aspects, but none has given much attention to the demand side of the equation. However, demand is also prone to fluctuate in time and its misrepresentation may lead to additional errors. In this study, a stochastic approach was applied to model the fluctuating residential power demand of Canadians' homes. An hourly and a yearly average electricity mix were then used to compute the environmental impacts of the hourly or yearly average homes' electricity demand. Finally, an approach combining an average and a marginal hourly electricity mix was then proposed to assess the benefits of a simple demand side management strategy: the shifting of homes' dryers loads up to two hours later than usual. Results show that assuming a constant demand or electricity mix both leads to errors which may be as high as 150% depending on the period of the month assessed. Moreover, using an hourly average electricity mix to set up the demand side strategy increases climate change impact by 0.6% whereas using a marginal mix decreases climate change impact by 10%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住宅电力需求波动的环境评估
在电力系统的环境评估中包括动态方面,可以计算智能电网需求侧管理策略的环境效益,这无法用静态数据(例如将部分需求从一个时期转移到另一个时期)进行评估。在生命周期评估方面已经发展了几种方法方法来解释动态方面,但是没有一种方法对方程式的需求方面给予太多注意。然而,需求也容易随时间波动,其错误表述可能导致额外的错误。在本研究中,采用随机方法对加拿大家庭的住宅电力需求波动进行建模。然后使用每小时和每年的平均电力组合来计算每小时或每年的平均家庭电力需求对环境的影响。最后,提出了一种结合平均和边际小时电力组合的方法,以评估简单的需求侧管理策略的好处:将家庭烘干机的负荷转移到比平时晚两个小时。结果表明,假设一个恒定的需求或电力组合都会导致误差,根据评估的月份期间,误差可能高达150%。此外,使用小时平均电力组合来制定需求侧战略,可使气候变化影响增加0.6%,而使用边际电力组合可使气候变化影响减少10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Inter-Virtual Machine Traffic on Energy Efficient Virtual Machines Placement A Testbed for Adaptive Microphones in Ultra-Low-Power Systems Environmental Assessment of Fluctuating Residential Electricity Demand A new routing metric for real-time applications in smart cities Toward Predictive Handover Mechanism in Software-Defined Enterprise Wi-Fi Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1