Glioblastoma Re-Irradiation: Impact of Concomitant Bevacizumab - Retrospective Series of 61 Cases

{"title":"Glioblastoma Re-Irradiation: Impact of Concomitant Bevacizumab - Retrospective Series of 61 Cases","authors":"","doi":"10.51626/ijor.2020.01.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. Although the standard of initial treatment is well defined, no recommendation exists in the relapse setting. This work focuses on the optimal strategy for recurrent glioblastoma.\nMethods: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of all recurrent glioblastoma adult patients treated since 2000 in one neuro-oncology center by re-irradiation, alone or combined with chemotherapy and/or surgery at first or second relapse.\nResults: Overall, 61 patients underwent a re-irradiation for glioblastoma relapse. Patient median age at diagnosis was 55 (27 to 76), 44% were women. At diagnosis, 77% underwent surgical resection and 23% were biopsied. Most of them (95%) received a Stuppregimen. After a median follow-up of 31.1 months, 44 patients (72%) had died and the median overall survival (mOS) was 39.8 months. Regardless of the time of treatment (first or second relapse), patients treated with radiation therapy concomitant to bevacizumab (RTbev, n=36) showed superior survival data compared to patients treated with radiation therapy alone (RTalone, n=17). At first relapse, median progression free survival (mPFS) of RTbev (n=19) was 9.9 versus 3.6 months for RTalone (n=6) (OR=3.98 (3.14-61.81); p=0.001). At second relapse, mPFS of RTbev (n=17) was 9.2 versus 5.4 months for RTalone (n=11) (OR=2.31 (1.18-7.75); p =0.03), and mOS of RTbev was 15.2 versus 9.1 months for RTalone (OR=3.60 (2.17-18.13); p=0.001).\nConclusion: This retrospective monocentric analysis reports a favorable impact of bevacizumab adjunction to re-irradiation. The high mOS may be due to patient selection, but emphasis the relevance of a multidisciplinary approach.","PeriodicalId":247564,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51626/ijor.2020.01.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. Although the standard of initial treatment is well defined, no recommendation exists in the relapse setting. This work focuses on the optimal strategy for recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of all recurrent glioblastoma adult patients treated since 2000 in one neuro-oncology center by re-irradiation, alone or combined with chemotherapy and/or surgery at first or second relapse. Results: Overall, 61 patients underwent a re-irradiation for glioblastoma relapse. Patient median age at diagnosis was 55 (27 to 76), 44% were women. At diagnosis, 77% underwent surgical resection and 23% were biopsied. Most of them (95%) received a Stuppregimen. After a median follow-up of 31.1 months, 44 patients (72%) had died and the median overall survival (mOS) was 39.8 months. Regardless of the time of treatment (first or second relapse), patients treated with radiation therapy concomitant to bevacizumab (RTbev, n=36) showed superior survival data compared to patients treated with radiation therapy alone (RTalone, n=17). At first relapse, median progression free survival (mPFS) of RTbev (n=19) was 9.9 versus 3.6 months for RTalone (n=6) (OR=3.98 (3.14-61.81); p=0.001). At second relapse, mPFS of RTbev (n=17) was 9.2 versus 5.4 months for RTalone (n=11) (OR=2.31 (1.18-7.75); p =0.03), and mOS of RTbev was 15.2 versus 9.1 months for RTalone (OR=3.60 (2.17-18.13); p=0.001). Conclusion: This retrospective monocentric analysis reports a favorable impact of bevacizumab adjunction to re-irradiation. The high mOS may be due to patient selection, but emphasis the relevance of a multidisciplinary approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胶质母细胞瘤再照射:伴随贝伐单抗的影响——61例回顾性分析
目的:胶质母细胞瘤是最常见的原发性脑肿瘤,预后较差。虽然初始治疗的标准是明确的,但在复发的情况下没有建议。这项工作的重点是复发性胶质母细胞瘤的最佳策略。方法:我们对自2000年以来在一个神经肿瘤中心接受再照射、单独或联合化疗和/或手术治疗的所有复发性胶质母细胞瘤成人患者进行了回顾性单中心分析。结果:总体而言,61例胶质母细胞瘤复发患者接受了再次放疗。患者诊断时的中位年龄为55岁(27 - 76岁),44%为女性。确诊时,77%接受手术切除,23%接受活检。他们中的大多数(95%)接受了Stuppregimen。中位随访31.1个月后,44例(72%)患者死亡,中位总生存期(mOS)为39.8个月。无论治疗时间(第一次或第二次复发),与单独放疗(RTalone, n=17)的患者相比,放疗联合贝伐单抗治疗的患者(RTbev, n=36)显示出更高的生存数据。首次复发时,RTbev (n=19)的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为9.9个月,而RTalone (n=6)为3.6个月(OR=3.98 (3.14-61.81);p = 0.001)。第二次复发时,RTbev (n=17)的mPFS为9.2个月,而RTalone (n=11)的mPFS为5.4个月(OR=2.31 (1.18-7.75);p =0.03), RTbev的生存期为15.2个月,RTalone的生存期为9.1个月(OR=3.60 (2.17-18.13);p = 0.001)。结论:本回顾性单中心分析报告了贝伐单抗配合再照射的有利影响。高mOS可能是由于患者选择,但强调多学科方法的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral Field Cancerization: A Review with Case Reports Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor to the Omentum and Endometrium: A Case Report Digital Pathology Implementation can Help Alleviate Limited Pathology Services in Developing Countries Carcinoma Ex Combined Inverted and Oncocytic Types Sinonasal Papilloma with Multifocal Severe Dysplasia: A Case Report Diffuse Midline Glioma H3 K27-Mutant in an Adult: A Rare Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1