{"title":"Glioblastoma Re-Irradiation: Impact of Concomitant Bevacizumab - Retrospective Series of 61 Cases","authors":"","doi":"10.51626/ijor.2020.01.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. Although the standard of initial treatment is well defined, no recommendation exists in the relapse setting. This work focuses on the optimal strategy for recurrent glioblastoma.\nMethods: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of all recurrent glioblastoma adult patients treated since 2000 in one neuro-oncology center by re-irradiation, alone or combined with chemotherapy and/or surgery at first or second relapse.\nResults: Overall, 61 patients underwent a re-irradiation for glioblastoma relapse. Patient median age at diagnosis was 55 (27 to 76), 44% were women. At diagnosis, 77% underwent surgical resection and 23% were biopsied. Most of them (95%) received a Stuppregimen. After a median follow-up of 31.1 months, 44 patients (72%) had died and the median overall survival (mOS) was 39.8 months. Regardless of the time of treatment (first or second relapse), patients treated with radiation therapy concomitant to bevacizumab (RTbev, n=36) showed superior survival data compared to patients treated with radiation therapy alone (RTalone, n=17). At first relapse, median progression free survival (mPFS) of RTbev (n=19) was 9.9 versus 3.6 months for RTalone (n=6) (OR=3.98 (3.14-61.81); p=0.001). At second relapse, mPFS of RTbev (n=17) was 9.2 versus 5.4 months for RTalone (n=11) (OR=2.31 (1.18-7.75); p =0.03), and mOS of RTbev was 15.2 versus 9.1 months for RTalone (OR=3.60 (2.17-18.13); p=0.001).\nConclusion: This retrospective monocentric analysis reports a favorable impact of bevacizumab adjunction to re-irradiation. The high mOS may be due to patient selection, but emphasis the relevance of a multidisciplinary approach.","PeriodicalId":247564,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51626/ijor.2020.01.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. Although the standard of initial treatment is well defined, no recommendation exists in the relapse setting. This work focuses on the optimal strategy for recurrent glioblastoma.
Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of all recurrent glioblastoma adult patients treated since 2000 in one neuro-oncology center by re-irradiation, alone or combined with chemotherapy and/or surgery at first or second relapse.
Results: Overall, 61 patients underwent a re-irradiation for glioblastoma relapse. Patient median age at diagnosis was 55 (27 to 76), 44% were women. At diagnosis, 77% underwent surgical resection and 23% were biopsied. Most of them (95%) received a Stuppregimen. After a median follow-up of 31.1 months, 44 patients (72%) had died and the median overall survival (mOS) was 39.8 months. Regardless of the time of treatment (first or second relapse), patients treated with radiation therapy concomitant to bevacizumab (RTbev, n=36) showed superior survival data compared to patients treated with radiation therapy alone (RTalone, n=17). At first relapse, median progression free survival (mPFS) of RTbev (n=19) was 9.9 versus 3.6 months for RTalone (n=6) (OR=3.98 (3.14-61.81); p=0.001). At second relapse, mPFS of RTbev (n=17) was 9.2 versus 5.4 months for RTalone (n=11) (OR=2.31 (1.18-7.75); p =0.03), and mOS of RTbev was 15.2 versus 9.1 months for RTalone (OR=3.60 (2.17-18.13); p=0.001).
Conclusion: This retrospective monocentric analysis reports a favorable impact of bevacizumab adjunction to re-irradiation. The high mOS may be due to patient selection, but emphasis the relevance of a multidisciplinary approach.