Comparing Apples and Apples: Ten Years of Constitutional Experience in Bhutan, India and the United States

M. Peil
{"title":"Comparing Apples and Apples: Ten Years of Constitutional Experience in Bhutan, India and the United States","authors":"M. Peil","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3266300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observers of the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional experience too often fall into the trap of comparing it to its 21st century contemporaries, many of which have decades’ more experience in constitutional order. The author instead compares the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional democratic monarchy (2008-18) with those of the United States (1781-1791) and India (1949-1959), in hopes of establishing a better benchmark. This paper was originally published in the Bhutan Law Review, Volume X, 2018. Issued by the Bhutan National Legal Institute (BNLI).","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observers of the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional experience too often fall into the trap of comparing it to its 21st century contemporaries, many of which have decades’ more experience in constitutional order. The author instead compares the first ten years of Bhutan’s constitutional democratic monarchy (2008-18) with those of the United States (1781-1791) and India (1949-1959), in hopes of establishing a better benchmark. This paper was originally published in the Bhutan Law Review, Volume X, 2018. Issued by the Bhutan National Legal Institute (BNLI).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较苹果和苹果:不丹、印度和美国十年宪政经验
观察不丹前十年宪法经验的人常常会陷入将其与21世纪的同龄人进行比较的陷阱中,许多人在宪法秩序方面有几十年的经验。作者将不丹实行君主立宪制的前十年(2008-18年)与美国(1781-1791年)和印度(1949-1959年)进行了比较,希望能建立一个更好的基准。本文原载于《不丹法律评论》2018年第10期。由不丹国家法律研究所(BNLI)颁发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Debate on Constitutional Standing and Greater Autonomy for Cities: Lessons from The Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macao Agility Over Stability: China’s Great Reversal in Regulating the Platform Economy The Governance Crisis in Myanmar: An International Law Perspective and International Society Response Towards Myanmar 2021 Coup D’ Etat. Vietnam: Data Privacy in a Communist ASEAN State India's Cartel Penalty Practices, Optimal Restitution and Deterrence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1