A Study on Developing the Evaluation Items for Estimating the Digitization Level of Libraries

Younghee Noh
{"title":"A Study on Developing the Evaluation Items for Estimating the Digitization Level of Libraries","authors":"Younghee Noh","doi":"10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.2.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to develop items for evaluating the level of the digitization of libraries. For this purpose, it analyzed the literature related to the digital library, underwent a convergence process of 10 experts, and finally derived an axis of 13 different dimensions comparing the digitization of libraries. The axis is composed of acquisitions, collections (physical and online collections), classification and cataloging, circulation service, reference, user service, SNS service, the library’s organization and staff, device providing service, next-generation service, and status of our library. This study conducted a survey of librarians to secure the validation of the primarily derived evaluation items regarding libraries’ digitization. As a result, the average rating of the traditional evaluation items was 3.82, and the average rating of the digital evaluation items was 4.08. Therefore, it can be said that the results of this research to evaluate the digitized level of libraries have a certain degree of validity.","PeriodicalId":179590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Society for Library and Information Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Society for Library and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.2.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop items for evaluating the level of the digitization of libraries. For this purpose, it analyzed the literature related to the digital library, underwent a convergence process of 10 experts, and finally derived an axis of 13 different dimensions comparing the digitization of libraries. The axis is composed of acquisitions, collections (physical and online collections), classification and cataloging, circulation service, reference, user service, SNS service, the library’s organization and staff, device providing service, next-generation service, and status of our library. This study conducted a survey of librarians to secure the validation of the primarily derived evaluation items regarding libraries’ digitization. As a result, the average rating of the traditional evaluation items was 3.82, and the average rating of the digital evaluation items was 4.08. Therefore, it can be said that the results of this research to evaluate the digitized level of libraries have a certain degree of validity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书馆数字化水平评估项目开发研究
本研究旨在开发评估图书馆数位化水平的项目。为此,分析了与数字图书馆相关的文献,经过10位专家的汇聚过程,最终得出了一个13个不同维度的轴来比较图书馆的数字化。轴由采访、馆藏(实体馆藏和在线馆藏)、分类编目、流通服务、参考咨询、用户服务、SNS服务、图书馆组织和人员、提供服务的设备、下一代服务和图书馆现状组成。本研究对图书馆馆员进行调查,以确保主要衍生的图书馆数字化评估项目的有效性。结果显示,传统评价项目的平均评分为3.82,数字化评价项目的平均评分为4.08。因此,可以说本研究的结果对评价图书馆数字化水平具有一定的效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Spatial Composition Strategy for Older Adults in the Public Library A Qualitative Study Focusing on the Learning Experience of Graduate Students with Master's Degree in Educational School Librarianship A Study on the Establishment of the Comprehensive Academic Contents Linking System: Focusing on KISTI An Investigation on Digital Humanities Research Trend by Analyzing the Papers of Digital Humanities Conferences Comparison of Research Performance Between Domestic and International Library and Information Science Scholars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1