An Exploratory Study on Preparers’ Perception of ESEF Reporting: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange

Daria Miścikowska
{"title":"An Exploratory Study on Preparers’ Perception of ESEF Reporting: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange","authors":"Daria Miścikowska","doi":"10.2478/foli-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research background: This paper focuses on the preparers’ opinion on reporting in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF). Purpose: The goal of the paper is to examine the preparers’ perception of adopting Inline XBRL as a fundamental technology to report annual consolidated financial statements under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) within the ESEF framework. Research methodology: In the present work, Poland was considered as a case study. Using the survey, we obtained evidence from 25 issuers of securities listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, whose financial reports were complied with IFRS. Results: The questionnaires were completed in the majority by issuers with no previous experience in XBRL utilisation. One of the more significant findings to emerge from this study is that respondents could not be able to judge the appropriateness of Inline XBRL selection as a digital reporting format, or they disagreed with it. Furthermore, over half of them saw no need to extend this technology to other business reports, including non-financial reporting. Novelty: The paper can offer valuable pre-insights into preparers’ perception of introducing Inline XBRL in the context of ESEF reporting and ensure initial feedback to the policy-makers responsible for ongoing and forthcoming digital reporting standards initiatives in the European Union.","PeriodicalId":314664,"journal":{"name":"Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2022-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Research background: This paper focuses on the preparers’ opinion on reporting in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF). Purpose: The goal of the paper is to examine the preparers’ perception of adopting Inline XBRL as a fundamental technology to report annual consolidated financial statements under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) within the ESEF framework. Research methodology: In the present work, Poland was considered as a case study. Using the survey, we obtained evidence from 25 issuers of securities listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, whose financial reports were complied with IFRS. Results: The questionnaires were completed in the majority by issuers with no previous experience in XBRL utilisation. One of the more significant findings to emerge from this study is that respondents could not be able to judge the appropriateness of Inline XBRL selection as a digital reporting format, or they disagreed with it. Furthermore, over half of them saw no need to extend this technology to other business reports, including non-financial reporting. Novelty: The paper can offer valuable pre-insights into preparers’ perception of introducing Inline XBRL in the context of ESEF reporting and ensure initial feedback to the policy-makers responsible for ongoing and forthcoming digital reporting standards initiatives in the European Union.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于编制人对ESEF报告感知的探索性研究:来自华沙证券交易所的证据
摘要研究背景:本文主要研究财务报表编制人对欧洲单一电子格式(ESEF)报告的意见。目的:本文的目的是检查编制人对采用内联XBRL作为ESEF框架内国际财务报告准则(IFRS)下报告年度合并财务报表的基本技术的看法。研究方法:在本工作中,波兰被视为一个案例研究。通过调查,我们获得了25家华沙证券交易所上市证券发行人的证据,这些发行人的财务报告符合国际财务报告准则。结果:大部分问卷是由没有XBRL使用经验的发行人完成的。从这项研究中出现的一个更重要的发现是,受访者无法判断内联XBRL选择作为数字报告格式的适当性,或者他们不同意它。此外,超过一半的受访者认为没有必要将这项技术扩展到其他业务报告,包括非财务报告。新颖性:该文件可以为编制者在ESEF报告背景下引入内联XBRL的看法提供有价值的预见解,并确保向负责欧盟正在进行和即将出台的数字报告标准倡议的政策制定者提供初步反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Land Resources and Agricultural Exports Nexus Conflict of interests among shareholders – does it refer to dividend decisions? An Attempt to Measure and Model Women’s Attitudes to Saving for Retirement Reliability of Renewable Power Generation using the Example of Offshore Wind Farms Balance of Payments as a Monetary Phenomenon: An ARDL Bounds Test Method for Algeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1