TOWARDS IMPROVED BIOAEROSOL MODEL VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION

Ben Williams, E. Hayes, Z. Nasir, C. Rolph, S. Jackson, S. Khera, A. Bennett, T. Gladding, G. Drew, J. Longhurst, S. Tyrrel
{"title":"TOWARDS IMPROVED BIOAEROSOL MODEL VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION","authors":"Ben Williams, E. Hayes, Z. Nasir, C. Rolph, S. Jackson, S. Khera, A. Bennett, T. Gladding, G. Drew, J. Longhurst, S. Tyrrel","doi":"10.2495/AIR180041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bioaerosols, comprised of bacteria, fungi and viruses are ubiquitous in ambient air. Known to adversely affect human health, the impact of bioaerosols on a population often manifests as outbreaks of illnesses such as Legionnaires Disease and Q fever, although the concentrations and environmental conditions in which these impacts occur are not well understood. Bioaerosol concentrations vary from source to source, but specific industrialised human activities such as water treatment, intensive agriculture and open windrow composting facilitate the generation of bioaerosol concentrations many times higher than natural background levels. Bioaerosol sampling is currently undertaken according to the requirements of the Environment Agency’s regulatory framework, in which the collection of bioaerosols and not its long term measurement is of most importance. As a consequence, sampling devices are often moved around site according to changing wind direction and sampling intervals are invariably short-term. The dispersion modelling of bioaerosols from composting facilities typically relies on proxy pollutant parameters. In addition, the use of short term emission data gathering strategies in which monitors are moved frequently with wind direction, do not provide a robust reliable and repeatable dataset by which to validate any modelling or to verify its performance. New sampling methods such as the Spectral Intensity Bioaerosol Sensor (SIBS) provide an opportunity to address several gaps in bioaerosol model validation and verification. In the context of model validation, this paper sets out the current weaknesses in bioaerosol monitoring from the perspective of robust modelling requirements","PeriodicalId":165416,"journal":{"name":"Air Pollution XXVI","volume":"9 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Pollution XXVI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/AIR180041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioaerosols, comprised of bacteria, fungi and viruses are ubiquitous in ambient air. Known to adversely affect human health, the impact of bioaerosols on a population often manifests as outbreaks of illnesses such as Legionnaires Disease and Q fever, although the concentrations and environmental conditions in which these impacts occur are not well understood. Bioaerosol concentrations vary from source to source, but specific industrialised human activities such as water treatment, intensive agriculture and open windrow composting facilitate the generation of bioaerosol concentrations many times higher than natural background levels. Bioaerosol sampling is currently undertaken according to the requirements of the Environment Agency’s regulatory framework, in which the collection of bioaerosols and not its long term measurement is of most importance. As a consequence, sampling devices are often moved around site according to changing wind direction and sampling intervals are invariably short-term. The dispersion modelling of bioaerosols from composting facilities typically relies on proxy pollutant parameters. In addition, the use of short term emission data gathering strategies in which monitors are moved frequently with wind direction, do not provide a robust reliable and repeatable dataset by which to validate any modelling or to verify its performance. New sampling methods such as the Spectral Intensity Bioaerosol Sensor (SIBS) provide an opportunity to address several gaps in bioaerosol model validation and verification. In the context of model validation, this paper sets out the current weaknesses in bioaerosol monitoring from the perspective of robust modelling requirements
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进生物气溶胶模型的验证和验证
由细菌、真菌和病毒组成的生物气溶胶在环境空气中无处不在。众所周知,生物气溶胶对人类健康有不利影响,对人群的影响通常表现为军团病和Q热等疾病的爆发,尽管对这些影响发生的浓度和环境条件尚不清楚。生物气溶胶浓度因来源而异,但特定的工业化人类活动,如水处理、集约化农业和开窗堆肥,促进了生物气溶胶浓度的产生,其浓度比自然背景水平高出许多倍。生物气溶胶取样目前是根据环境署监管框架的要求进行的,其中最重要的是收集生物气溶胶,而不是长期测量。因此,采样装置经常根据风向的变化在现场移动,采样间隔总是很短。来自堆肥设施的生物气溶胶的分散模型通常依赖于代理污染物参数。此外,使用短期排放数据收集策略,即监测仪随风向频繁移动,不能提供可靠和可重复的数据集,无法验证任何建模或验证其性能。新的采样方法,如光谱强度生物气溶胶传感器(SIBS),为解决生物气溶胶模型验证和验证中的几个空白提供了机会。在模型验证的背景下,本文从稳健建模要求的角度阐述了目前生物气溶胶监测的弱点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A PRELIMINARY STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDOOR ENVIRONMENT AND ITS EFFECT ON PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH PROJECTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF DIESEL CARS ON GASEOUS POLLUTANTS, PM2.5 AND CO2 IN A METROPOLITAN AREA FACILITATING STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUES ON A CARBON NEUTRAL CITY: WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT CARBON (AND AIR QUALITY) DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL AEROSOLS USING LASER-TRAPPING SINGLE-PARTICLE RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY SPATIAL HIGH-RESOLUTION MAPPING OF NATIONAL EMISSIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1