THEORETICAL COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF THE BIOGAZ YIELDS FROM ONE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESSES

Ning Pan, Haoping Wang, Yang Tian, E. Chorukova, I. Simeonov, N. Christov
{"title":"THEORETICAL COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF THE BIOGAZ YIELDS FROM ONE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESSES","authors":"Ning Pan, Haoping Wang, Yang Tian, E. Chorukova, I. Simeonov, N. Christov","doi":"10.32006/eeep.2022.2.4455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the theoretical comparison of biogas and energy yields of one-stage anaerobic digestion processes (OSAD) with biomethane production and two-stage anaerobic digestion processes (TSAD) producing biohydrogen and biomethane. The comparative study of the biogas yield from OSAD and TSAD systems is performed on the base on mathematical models obtained in our previous papers. The possible maximal yields of biohydrogen and biomethane are calculated by the static characteristics and extremum points of both systems. Simulation results suggest that in comparison to OSAD, the increase in biogas (biohydrogen and biomethgane) production of TSAD can reach to 75.18%. The energy produced from two-stage anaerobic digestion processes is 1.32 to 1.486 times greater than those from one-stage anaerobic digestion processes (depending of the inlet organics concentrations), which means TSAD is a better choice considering biogas and energy production.","PeriodicalId":369361,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering and Environment Protection","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering and Environment Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32006/eeep.2022.2.4455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper deals with the theoretical comparison of biogas and energy yields of one-stage anaerobic digestion processes (OSAD) with biomethane production and two-stage anaerobic digestion processes (TSAD) producing biohydrogen and biomethane. The comparative study of the biogas yield from OSAD and TSAD systems is performed on the base on mathematical models obtained in our previous papers. The possible maximal yields of biohydrogen and biomethane are calculated by the static characteristics and extremum points of both systems. Simulation results suggest that in comparison to OSAD, the increase in biogas (biohydrogen and biomethgane) production of TSAD can reach to 75.18%. The energy produced from two-stage anaerobic digestion processes is 1.32 to 1.486 times greater than those from one-stage anaerobic digestion processes (depending of the inlet organics concentrations), which means TSAD is a better choice considering biogas and energy production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一段和两段厌氧消化过程沼气产量的理论比较研究
本文对产生生物甲烷的一段厌氧消化工艺(OSAD)和产生生物氢和生物甲烷的两段厌氧消化工艺(TSAD)的沼气和产能进行了理论比较。对OSAD系统和TSAD系统的沼气产量进行了比较研究,并基于我们之前论文中得到的数学模型。根据两种体系的静态特性和极值点,计算出生物氢和生物甲烷可能的最大产率。模拟结果表明,与OSAD相比,TSAD的沼气(生物氢和生物甲烷)产量可提高75.18%。两段厌氧消化过程产生的能量是一段厌氧消化过程产生的能量的1.32 ~ 1.486倍(取决于进口有机物浓度),这意味着考虑沼气和能源生产,TSAD是更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MINERAL WATERS IN BULGARIA BIOCIDAL ACTION OF ANOLYTE METHODOLOGY FOR A KINEMATIC MODEL OF SEISMIC EARLY WARNING SYSTEM ABOUT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE BIOKINETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF FERROPLASMA ACIDIPHILUM MICROBIAL BIOREMOVAL OF DIVALENT TOXIC METALS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1