Evaluation criteria for health information systems using human, organization and technology-Fit (HOT-Fit) Framework: Comprehensive review

Halimeh Jamal, S. Fazaeli, zahra ebnhosini, H. Tabesh, M. Samadbeik, S. S. Mahmoudian, M. Meraji
{"title":"Evaluation criteria for health information systems using human, organization and technology-Fit (HOT-Fit) Framework: Comprehensive review","authors":"Halimeh Jamal, S. Fazaeli, zahra ebnhosini, H. Tabesh, M. Samadbeik, S. S. Mahmoudian, M. Meraji","doi":"10.29252/JMIS.6.2.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Nowadays, the concentration of information systems evaluation is changing from technical issues toward humanoid and organizational subjects. To evaluate the interrelationships between these three dimensions in health systems, the HOT-Fit Assessment Framework (HOT-Fit) was proposed in 2006. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify accurate criteria for evaluating systems based on this model. Information sources or data: In the field of health information evaluation using HOT-Fit criteria, articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Persian e-databases including Iran Public Information Database (Magiran), Iran University Jihad Scientific Information Database, and Irandoc were searched from 2006 to 2019. Selection methods for study: The extracted articles were reviewed by content analysis method. From 1062 articles, 18 articles were selected after eliminating duplicated articles and unrelated articles according to their title, abstract and full text. Combine content and Results: After reviewing evaluation criteria of health information systems using HOT-Fit framework, 130 benchmarks were obtained from databases in four different dimensions including technical (n=51), organizational (n=36), human (n=33) and net profit dimensions (n=10). Conclusion: In this comprehensive review, we tried to provide a practical and comprehensive view of the evaluation of hospital information systems using the HOT-Fit model. This model can be used for all health hospital information system. Generally, the results of this review can be useful for information technology policymakers in determining health information systems evaluation criteria.","PeriodicalId":231482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMIS.6.2.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Nowadays, the concentration of information systems evaluation is changing from technical issues toward humanoid and organizational subjects. To evaluate the interrelationships between these three dimensions in health systems, the HOT-Fit Assessment Framework (HOT-Fit) was proposed in 2006. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify accurate criteria for evaluating systems based on this model. Information sources or data: In the field of health information evaluation using HOT-Fit criteria, articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Persian e-databases including Iran Public Information Database (Magiran), Iran University Jihad Scientific Information Database, and Irandoc were searched from 2006 to 2019. Selection methods for study: The extracted articles were reviewed by content analysis method. From 1062 articles, 18 articles were selected after eliminating duplicated articles and unrelated articles according to their title, abstract and full text. Combine content and Results: After reviewing evaluation criteria of health information systems using HOT-Fit framework, 130 benchmarks were obtained from databases in four different dimensions including technical (n=51), organizational (n=36), human (n=33) and net profit dimensions (n=10). Conclusion: In this comprehensive review, we tried to provide a practical and comprehensive view of the evaluation of hospital information systems using the HOT-Fit model. This model can be used for all health hospital information system. Generally, the results of this review can be useful for information technology policymakers in determining health information systems evaluation criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人、组织和技术(HOT-Fit)框架的卫生信息系统评价标准:全面审查
目的:当前,信息系统评价的焦点正从技术问题向类人问题和组织问题转变。为了评估卫生系统中这三个维度之间的相互关系,2006年提出了HOT-Fit评估框架(HOT-Fit)。因此,本研究旨在确定基于该模型的系统评估的准确标准。信息来源或数据:在使用HOT-Fit标准的健康信息评估领域,检索了2006年至2019年在PubMed、Scopus和波斯语电子数据库(包括伊朗公共信息数据库(Magiran)、伊朗大学Jihad科学信息数据库和Irandoc)中的文章。研究选择方法:采用含量分析法对提取的文献进行评价。从1062篇文章中,根据标题、摘要、全文剔除重复文章和不相关文章,筛选出18篇。结合内容和结果:在使用HOT-Fit框架审查卫生信息系统的评价标准后,从数据库中获得了四个不同维度的130个基准,包括技术(n=51)、组织(n=36)、人力(n=33)和净利润(n=10)。结论:在这篇全面的综述中,我们试图为使用HOT-Fit模型评估医院信息系统提供一个实用而全面的观点。该模型可用于所有的卫生医院信息系统。一般来说,这一审查的结果可用于信息技术决策者确定卫生信息系统评价标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing the factors affecting the satisfaction of students of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences: A qualitative study Advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation updates 2020: a narrative review Design and implementation of tools for rapid assessment of the status of documentation of emergency department' physicians The acceptance model of e-learning during the coronavirus pandemic Investigating Barriers and Providing an Appropriate Model for Establishing Total Quality Management: A Case Study in Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1