Kendala Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Di SMA Kabupaten Kotabaru

Muhammad Ali
{"title":"Kendala Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Di SMA Kabupaten Kotabaru","authors":"Muhammad Ali","doi":"10.33659/cip.v8i1.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general objective of this research is to describe the constraints of high school teachers in applying the 2013 Curriculum in Physics learning in Kotabaru District and the specific objectives of selecting lesson plans, understanding learning activities and understanding learning principles. This research method is descriptive data analysis with the object of research of high school physics teachers in Kotabaru Regency and this study is a qualitative study. The research data was obtained through observation / interviews and teacher responses questionnaire. The results of the study show: (1) 25.53% Teachers are still constrained by the preparation of lesson plans, especially in various learning sources (open texts, internet, natural and social environment), varied learning media, media that are compatible with learning material, scientific learning approaches, (2) 25.25% Teachers are still constrained in implementing learning activities which include the delivery of competencies to be achieved to students, have not carried out contextual and scientific learning, have not facilitated students to analyze information to make conclusions, have not used varied learning media, ( 3) 36.71% Teachers are constrained to understand the principle of learning mainly related to differences in textual approaches with scientific approaches, differences in partial learning with integrated learning, learning differences that emphasize single answers with learning that requires multi-dimensional answers, and differences in learning of verbalism with learning. applicable learning. \n  \nKeywords: Teacher Constraints, 2013 Curriculum, Scientific.","PeriodicalId":292250,"journal":{"name":"CENDEKIA: JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CENDEKIA: JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v8i1.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The general objective of this research is to describe the constraints of high school teachers in applying the 2013 Curriculum in Physics learning in Kotabaru District and the specific objectives of selecting lesson plans, understanding learning activities and understanding learning principles. This research method is descriptive data analysis with the object of research of high school physics teachers in Kotabaru Regency and this study is a qualitative study. The research data was obtained through observation / interviews and teacher responses questionnaire. The results of the study show: (1) 25.53% Teachers are still constrained by the preparation of lesson plans, especially in various learning sources (open texts, internet, natural and social environment), varied learning media, media that are compatible with learning material, scientific learning approaches, (2) 25.25% Teachers are still constrained in implementing learning activities which include the delivery of competencies to be achieved to students, have not carried out contextual and scientific learning, have not facilitated students to analyze information to make conclusions, have not used varied learning media, ( 3) 36.71% Teachers are constrained to understand the principle of learning mainly related to differences in textual approaches with scientific approaches, differences in partial learning with integrated learning, learning differences that emphasize single answers with learning that requires multi-dimensional answers, and differences in learning of verbalism with learning. applicable learning.   Keywords: Teacher Constraints, 2013 Curriculum, Scientific.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的总体目标是描述小坂丸地区高中教师在应用2013年物理课程学习中的制约因素,以及选择教案、理解学习活动和理解学习原则的具体目标。本研究方法为描述性数据分析,研究对象为小坂丸县高中物理教师,本研究为定性研究。研究数据通过观察/访谈和教师回答问卷获得。研究结果表明:(1) 25.53%教师在备课计划方面仍然受到限制,特别是在不同的学习资源(开放文本、互联网、自然和社会环境)、不同的学习媒体、与学习材料兼容的媒体、科学的学习方法方面。(2)25.25%教师在实施学习活动方面仍然受到限制,包括向学生传授要达到的能力,没有进行情境化和科学的学习。(3) 36.71%教师对学习原则的理解受到限制,主要涉及文本方法与科学方法的差异、局部学习与综合学习的差异、强调单一答案的学习与需要多维答案的学习的差异、语言学习与学习的差异。适用的学习。关键词:教师约束,2013年课程,科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PEMANFAATAN MEDIA AUDIO UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN MENYIMAK CERITA PADA SISWA KELAS III SDN 1 SUNGAI KUPANG Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika tentang Perkalian dan Pembagian Bilangan Bulat melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) di Kelas V SDN 1 Stagen Kabupaten Kotabaru ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN GURU DALAM PENGEMBANGAN BUKU AJAR BERMUATAN KEARIFAN LOKAL PASCA PANDEMI CIVID-19 DI KABUPATEN KOTABARU Profil Reversibilitas dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari tipe Kepribadian Siswa EFEKTIVITAS PENGGUNAAN GOOGLE CLASSROOM PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SELAMA PANDEMI COVID-19 MAN KOTABARU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1