Comparison of a Two-Phase Interleaved Boost Converter and Flyback Converter

2018 IEEE 18th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC) Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.1109/EPEPEMC.2018.8521891

Aydın Boyar, E. Kabalci

{"title":"Comparison of a Two-Phase Interleaved Boost Converter and Flyback Converter","authors":"Aydın Boyar, E. Kabalci","doi":"10.1109/EPEPEMC.2018.8521891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A big majority of electricity energy is generated from naturel sources such as coal, petroleum etc. in all over the world. The reserve of this sources are decreasing. However, the demand of electricity is increasing day by day. The researchers head for alternative energy sources such as biomass, geothermal, marine energies, hydropower, wind and solar. The most important of these is the solar energy. The studies about solar energy are increased in recent years. This study deals with the design and analysis of different converter topologies which are two phase interleaved boost converter and flyback converter in terms of structure, efficiency. Each system is consists of a photovoltaic (PV) module, converter topology and Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithm. The MPPT algorithm is necessary to acquire maximum power from the PV module. The power capacity of each system is 295 W and the input voltage of converters are around 54 V. While the output voltage of two-phase interleaved boost converter is 232 V, the output voltage of flyback converter is 238 V. In this study, it is determined that the efficiency of flyback converter is better than the two-phase interleaved boost converter.","PeriodicalId":251046,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 18th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC)","volume":"382 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 18th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPEMC.2018.8521891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Abstract

A big majority of electricity energy is generated from naturel sources such as coal, petroleum etc. in all over the world. The reserve of this sources are decreasing. However, the demand of electricity is increasing day by day. The researchers head for alternative energy sources such as biomass, geothermal, marine energies, hydropower, wind and solar. The most important of these is the solar energy. The studies about solar energy are increased in recent years. This study deals with the design and analysis of different converter topologies which are two phase interleaved boost converter and flyback converter in terms of structure, efficiency. Each system is consists of a photovoltaic (PV) module, converter topology and Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithm. The MPPT algorithm is necessary to acquire maximum power from the PV module. The power capacity of each system is 295 W and the input voltage of converters are around 54 V. While the output voltage of two-phase interleaved boost converter is 232 V, the output voltage of flyback converter is 238 V. In this study, it is determined that the efficiency of flyback converter is better than the two-phase interleaved boost converter.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

两相交错升压变换器与反激变换器的比较

世界上绝大多数的电能是由煤、石油等自然资源产生的。这种资源的储量正在减少。然而，电力的需求日益增加。研究人员正在寻找替代能源，如生物质能、地热能、海洋能、水电、风能和太阳能。其中最重要的是太阳能。近年来，关于太阳能的研究越来越多。本文对两相交错升压变换器和反激变换器两种不同的变换器拓扑结构在结构和效率方面进行了设计和分析。每个系统由光伏(PV)模块、转换器拓扑和最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)算法组成。MPPT算法是获取光伏组件最大功率所必需的。每个系统的功率容量为295w，变换器的输入电压为54v左右。两相交错升压变换器的输出电压为232v，反激变换器的输出电压为238v。本研究确定反激变换器的效率优于两相交错升压变换器。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

2018 IEEE 18th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC)

自引率

0.00%

发文量