HBA1C: A REVIEW OF NON-GLYCAEMIC VARIABLES

Novita Retika
{"title":"HBA1C: A REVIEW OF NON-GLYCAEMIC VARIABLES","authors":"Novita Retika","doi":"10.53555/nnmhs.v9i9.1840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: People at risk for diabetes and those with high HbA1c are monitored for sugar levels. Age, race, gender, erythrocyte turnover, anemia, pregnancy, Haemoglobin variations, thyroid, liver, HIV, and renal disorders impact HbA1c nonthermally. Different forms of hemoglobin have long been recognized to alter HbA1c production and measurement. This interference depends on the congenital disease that affects hemoglobin production and the HbA1c measurement method. \nThe aim: This article showed non-glycaemic variables in HbA1c examination. \nMethods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done. \nResult: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 102 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 87 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total 34 articles for PubMed and 21 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 19 papers, 11 of which came from PubMed and eight of which came from SagePub. We included seven study that met the criteria. \nConclusion: HbA1c is straightforward, accurate, and on-site. It can diagnose and predict diabetes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas. Hyperglycemia—diabetes' biochemical hallmark—should be properly controlled to reduce complications. Age, ethnicity, gender, erythrocyte turnover, anemia, pregnancy, haemoglobin variations, thyroid, liver, HIV, and renal diseases affect HbA1c measurement.","PeriodicalId":347955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)","volume":"245 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/nnmhs.v9i9.1840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People at risk for diabetes and those with high HbA1c are monitored for sugar levels. Age, race, gender, erythrocyte turnover, anemia, pregnancy, Haemoglobin variations, thyroid, liver, HIV, and renal disorders impact HbA1c nonthermally. Different forms of hemoglobin have long been recognized to alter HbA1c production and measurement. This interference depends on the congenital disease that affects hemoglobin production and the HbA1c measurement method. The aim: This article showed non-glycaemic variables in HbA1c examination. Methods: By comparing itself to the standards set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. So, the experts were able to make sure that the study was as up-to-date as it was possible to be. For this search approach, publications that came out between 2013 and 2023 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed and SagePub, were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done. Result: In the PubMed database, the results of our search brought up 102 articles, whereas the results of our search on SagePub brought up 87 articles. The results of the search conducted for the last year of 2013 yielded a total 34 articles for PubMed and 21 articles for SagePub. In the end, we compiled a total of 19 papers, 11 of which came from PubMed and eight of which came from SagePub. We included seven study that met the criteria. Conclusion: HbA1c is straightforward, accurate, and on-site. It can diagnose and predict diabetes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas. Hyperglycemia—diabetes' biochemical hallmark—should be properly controlled to reduce complications. Age, ethnicity, gender, erythrocyte turnover, anemia, pregnancy, haemoglobin variations, thyroid, liver, HIV, and renal diseases affect HbA1c measurement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖化血红蛋白:非血糖变量的回顾
简介:监测糖尿病高危人群和HbA1c高的患者的血糖水平。年龄、种族、性别、红细胞周转、贫血、妊娠、血红蛋白变化、甲状腺、肝脏、HIV和肾脏疾病对HbA1c的影响是非热性的。人们早就认识到不同形式的血红蛋白会改变HbA1c的产生和测量。这种干扰取决于影响血红蛋白产生的先天性疾病和HbA1c测量方法。目的:本文分析了HbA1c检查中的非血糖变量。方法:通过与系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA) 2020设定的标准进行比较,本研究能够显示其满足所有要求。因此,专家们能够确保这项研究尽可能是最新的。在这种搜索方法中,研究人员考虑了2013年至2023年之间发表的出版物。几个不同的在线参考资源,如Pubmed和SagePub,被用来做这件事。决定不考虑评论文章、已经发表的作品或只完成一半的作品。结果:在PubMed数据库中,我们搜索的结果是102篇文章,而在SagePub上搜索的结果是87篇文章。2013年最后一年的搜索结果显示,PubMed总共有34篇文章,SagePub有21篇文章。最后,我们一共编辑了19篇论文,其中11篇来自PubMed, 8篇来自SagePub。我们纳入了7项符合标准的研究。结论:HbA1c检测直接、准确、现场。它可以诊断和预测中低收入国家和偏远地区的糖尿病。应适当控制高血糖——糖尿病的生化标志——以减少并发症。年龄、种族、性别、红细胞周转、贫血、妊娠、血红蛋白变化、甲状腺、肝脏、HIV和肾脏疾病影响HbA1c测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HBA1C: A REVIEW OF NON-GLYCAEMIC VARIABLES SCREENING FOR TUBERCULOSIS DISEASE AMONG CHILDREN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REVIEW ARTICLE: HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN PLACENTA AND RELATIONSHIP WITH CORONAVIRUS INFECTION DURING PREGNANCY TRANSLATION, ADAPTATION, VALIDATION AND APPLICATION OF “PATIENTS’ PERCEPTION SAFETY CULTURE SCALE (PAPSCS)” IN AN EGYPTIAN SURGICAL INPATIENT HEALTHCARE SETTING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POST BOWEL RESECTION ILEO-ILEAL INTUSSUSCEPTION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1