NURTURING A CULTURE OF PEACE IN SCHOOL CHILDREN

C. Catherine
{"title":"NURTURING A CULTURE OF PEACE IN SCHOOL CHILDREN","authors":"C. Catherine","doi":"10.18843/RWJASC/V8I3/09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION:Conflict has been part and parcel of the North East region since the time India got its independence from the British in 1947 and the gradual reorganization of its states and international borders. The region has been afflicted by conflicts ranging from demand for autonomy to fights over resources. Humanitarian measures like immediate relief after and crisis interventions during conflicts while very important are not enough. There is a growing need in the region for pre and post conflict interventions and trauma healing for a just and sustainable peace and development. As such, there are many Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) ranging from international to national and local working sometimes in isolation and other times in tandem with each other to build peace in the region. Different strategies ranging from advocacy, counseling, capacity building, and mediation to awareness creation are employed for various target groups such as top level to middle level as well as the grass roots level. The purpose of the present study was to examine the impact and relevance of a peace education programme implemented by North East Diocesan Social Service Society (NEDSSS) among children (peace club members) in schools in the states of Nagaland, Manipur and Tripura respectively.LITERATURE REVIEW:According to Harris and Morrison (2003), peace education is both a philosophy and a process. The philosophy of peace education teaches an understanding and compassion for life through nonviolence. The process of peace education exposes students to tools to create and maintain a safe and sustainable world. Peace education teaches important skills such as listening, reflecting, problem solving, cooperating and solving conflicts. Momodu (2009) posit that peace education is a behavioural and attitudinal change mechanism which aims at: pre-empting conflict (build-up); preventing conflict outbreaks; resolving conflict and promoting a culture of peace. Oshita (2006) believes that the aim of peace education becomes not just educating for peace but educating for a 'peace capacity'. Peace education is essentially a peace empowerment strategy which mainly equips individuals with the knowledge and skills to prevent and manage conflict at intra/inter-personal or intra/inter-group levels. Salomon (2002) re-echoes that \"peace education is unique because it deals with relations between groups, not individuals\". By and large, peace is a culture and a peoples' way of life, which can be promoted or propagated through education as a tool. Therefore, the whole essence of peace education is to promote the culture of nonviolence as against the culture of violence in responding to conflict between or among individuals and groups.Peace Education, its contexts, actors, and interpretations have a long and changing history. As a field it consists of several multidisciplinary sub-fields, each with different perspectives and approaches. The concept Peace Education has, both in history and today, been interpreted as an ethic, moral, religious and philosophical matter. In connection to war and peace disciplines like history, political and social sciences have discussed roads to a peaceful society, whilst the development of peace education as skills and competencies for conflict handling has roots in psychological and pedagogical theories (Andersson et al, 2011, p.1). The focus on peace education has increased substantially since the eighties of the last century (Harris, 2008; Thelin, 1996). This trend is widespread, and takes different forms and definitions in different cultures (Harris, 1990). Africa and South America speak of 'development education' and 'human rights education'; while peace education is referred to as 'Gandhian studies' in India. In Northern Europe, peace education is primarily motivated by the high cost of international armaments, and the term 'disarmament education' is often used. The Japanese refer to the atomic bombs that were dropped on their country at the end of WWII; peace education here comes under the title 'A - bomb education'. …","PeriodicalId":243104,"journal":{"name":"Researchers World","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Researchers World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18843/RWJASC/V8I3/09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:Conflict has been part and parcel of the North East region since the time India got its independence from the British in 1947 and the gradual reorganization of its states and international borders. The region has been afflicted by conflicts ranging from demand for autonomy to fights over resources. Humanitarian measures like immediate relief after and crisis interventions during conflicts while very important are not enough. There is a growing need in the region for pre and post conflict interventions and trauma healing for a just and sustainable peace and development. As such, there are many Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) ranging from international to national and local working sometimes in isolation and other times in tandem with each other to build peace in the region. Different strategies ranging from advocacy, counseling, capacity building, and mediation to awareness creation are employed for various target groups such as top level to middle level as well as the grass roots level. The purpose of the present study was to examine the impact and relevance of a peace education programme implemented by North East Diocesan Social Service Society (NEDSSS) among children (peace club members) in schools in the states of Nagaland, Manipur and Tripura respectively.LITERATURE REVIEW:According to Harris and Morrison (2003), peace education is both a philosophy and a process. The philosophy of peace education teaches an understanding and compassion for life through nonviolence. The process of peace education exposes students to tools to create and maintain a safe and sustainable world. Peace education teaches important skills such as listening, reflecting, problem solving, cooperating and solving conflicts. Momodu (2009) posit that peace education is a behavioural and attitudinal change mechanism which aims at: pre-empting conflict (build-up); preventing conflict outbreaks; resolving conflict and promoting a culture of peace. Oshita (2006) believes that the aim of peace education becomes not just educating for peace but educating for a 'peace capacity'. Peace education is essentially a peace empowerment strategy which mainly equips individuals with the knowledge and skills to prevent and manage conflict at intra/inter-personal or intra/inter-group levels. Salomon (2002) re-echoes that "peace education is unique because it deals with relations between groups, not individuals". By and large, peace is a culture and a peoples' way of life, which can be promoted or propagated through education as a tool. Therefore, the whole essence of peace education is to promote the culture of nonviolence as against the culture of violence in responding to conflict between or among individuals and groups.Peace Education, its contexts, actors, and interpretations have a long and changing history. As a field it consists of several multidisciplinary sub-fields, each with different perspectives and approaches. The concept Peace Education has, both in history and today, been interpreted as an ethic, moral, religious and philosophical matter. In connection to war and peace disciplines like history, political and social sciences have discussed roads to a peaceful society, whilst the development of peace education as skills and competencies for conflict handling has roots in psychological and pedagogical theories (Andersson et al, 2011, p.1). The focus on peace education has increased substantially since the eighties of the last century (Harris, 2008; Thelin, 1996). This trend is widespread, and takes different forms and definitions in different cultures (Harris, 1990). Africa and South America speak of 'development education' and 'human rights education'; while peace education is referred to as 'Gandhian studies' in India. In Northern Europe, peace education is primarily motivated by the high cost of international armaments, and the term 'disarmament education' is often used. The Japanese refer to the atomic bombs that were dropped on their country at the end of WWII; peace education here comes under the title 'A - bomb education'. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在学生中培养和平文化
导言:自从1947年印度从英国手中获得独立,并逐渐重组其邦和国际边界以来,冲突一直是东北地区不可分割的一部分。该地区一直受到各种冲突的困扰,从要求自治到争夺资源。人道主义措施,如冲突后的立即救济和冲突期间的危机干预,虽然非常重要,但还不够。为了实现公正和可持续的和平与发展,该地区越来越需要在冲突前和冲突后进行干预和创伤愈合。因此,有许多非政府组织(ngo),从国际到国家和地方,有时孤立地工作,有时相互配合,以建立该地区的和平。针对不同的目标群体,从高层到中层,再到基层,采用了不同的策略,从倡导、咨询、能力建设、调解到提高意识。本研究的目的是审查东北教区社会服务协会(NEDSSS)分别在那加兰邦、曼尼普尔邦和特里普拉邦学校的儿童(和平俱乐部成员)中实施的和平教育方案的影响和相关性。文献综述:Harris and Morrison(2003)认为和平教育既是一种哲学,也是一种过程。和平教育的理念是通过非暴力教导人们对生命的理解和同情。和平教育的过程使学生接触到创造和维持一个安全和可持续的世界的工具。和平教育教授重要的技能,如倾听、反思、解决问题、合作和解决冲突。Momodu(2009)认为和平教育是一种行为和态度的改变机制,其目的是:先发制人的冲突(积累);防止冲突爆发;解决冲突,促进和平文化。Oshita(2006)认为和平教育的目的不仅仅是为了和平而教育,而是为了培养“和平能力”。和平教育本质上是一种赋予和平权力的战略,主要是使个人具备在个人内部/人际之间或群体内部/群体之间预防和管理冲突的知识和技能。所罗门(2002)重申“和平教育是独特的,因为它处理的是群体之间的关系,而不是个人之间的关系”。总的来说,和平是一种文化和人民的生活方式,可以通过教育作为一种工具来促进或传播。因此,和平教育的全部本质是在应对个人和群体之间的冲突时促进非暴力文化,而不是暴力文化。和平教育及其背景、行动者和解释有着悠久而不断变化的历史。作为一个领域,它由几个多学科的子领域组成,每个子领域都有不同的观点和方法。和平教育的概念,无论是在历史上还是在今天,都被解释为一个伦理、道德、宗教和哲学问题。关于战争与和平学科,如历史、政治和社会科学,已经讨论了通往和平社会的道路,而和平教育作为处理冲突的技能和能力的发展根植于心理学和教育学理论(Andersson等人,2011年,第1页)。自上世纪80年代以来,对和平教育的关注大大增加(Harris, 2008;特林,1996)。这种趋势是普遍的,并采取不同的形式和定义在不同的文化(哈里斯,1990)。非洲和南美谈到“发展教育”和“人权教育”;而和平教育在印度被称为“甘地研究”。在北欧,和平教育的主要动机是国际军备的高昂费用,因此经常使用“裁军教育”一词。日本人指的是二战结束时投在他们国家的原子弹;和平教育在这里被称为“原子弹教育”。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mother Tongue – Based Reading Materials for Grade III Pupils: A Proposal Credit Risk and Public and Private Banks' Performance in India: A Panel Approach Strengthening Local Democracy through Local Political Parties in Aceh The Influence of Communication and Work Discipline on the Employee Performance (A Case Study of Employee Performance of DWI Arsa Citra Persada Foundation in Yogyakarta, Indonesia) Professional and Technical Education Scenario of the Scheduled Tribe Population in Malda District, West Bengal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1