Networks, Institutions, and Encounters: Information Exchange in Early-Modern Markets

Emily Erikson, S. Samila
{"title":"Networks, Institutions, and Encounters: Information Exchange in Early-Modern Markets","authors":"Emily Erikson, S. Samila","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2714931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging economies are characterized by the absence of robust legal infrastructures. In these contexts, social networks in the forms of merchant coalitions, kin-groups, and business groups have been shown to have effectively substituted for stable legal institutions by creating systems of reputation and social sanctioning that reduce contract uncertainty and thereby foster trade and commerce. For this reason, repeated interactions and cohesive groups are understood to play a crucial role in early economic development. One-shot market interactions, in contrast, have been linked to the presence of modern legal institutions. We use archival data from an emerging global trade network that developed over the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries to evaluate whether a strong institutional context is necessary for transient, one-shot exchange. We consider patterns of information exchange in the network and find that, contrary expectations there is (1) little evidence of reputation mechanisms, coalition formation, or reciprocity, (2) transient exchange is in evidence, (3) transient exchange predates strong formal governance, and (4) the increasing institutional strength of formal governance is associated with a decrease in transient exchange. We argue that transient exchange in this network of trade was encouraged by a pattern of interaction imposed upon traders by the factory system.","PeriodicalId":364440,"journal":{"name":"BHNP: History of Global Firms (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BHNP: History of Global Firms (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2714931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Emerging economies are characterized by the absence of robust legal infrastructures. In these contexts, social networks in the forms of merchant coalitions, kin-groups, and business groups have been shown to have effectively substituted for stable legal institutions by creating systems of reputation and social sanctioning that reduce contract uncertainty and thereby foster trade and commerce. For this reason, repeated interactions and cohesive groups are understood to play a crucial role in early economic development. One-shot market interactions, in contrast, have been linked to the presence of modern legal institutions. We use archival data from an emerging global trade network that developed over the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries to evaluate whether a strong institutional context is necessary for transient, one-shot exchange. We consider patterns of information exchange in the network and find that, contrary expectations there is (1) little evidence of reputation mechanisms, coalition formation, or reciprocity, (2) transient exchange is in evidence, (3) transient exchange predates strong formal governance, and (4) the increasing institutional strength of formal governance is associated with a decrease in transient exchange. We argue that transient exchange in this network of trade was encouraged by a pattern of interaction imposed upon traders by the factory system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络、制度与遭遇:早期现代市场中的信息交换
新兴经济体的特点是缺乏健全的法律基础设施。在这些背景下,商业联盟、亲属团体和商业团体形式的社会网络已经被证明可以有效地取代稳定的法律制度,通过创建声誉和社会制裁系统来减少合同的不确定性,从而促进贸易和商业。因此,重复的互动和有凝聚力的群体被认为在早期经济发展中起着至关重要的作用。相比之下,一次性市场互动与现代法律制度的存在有关。我们使用了从17、18、19世纪发展起来的新兴全球贸易网络的档案数据来评估一个强大的制度背景是否对短暂的、一次性的交换是必要的。我们考虑了网络中信息交换的模式,发现相反的预期有:(1)声誉机制、联盟形成或互惠的证据很少;(2)短暂交换是有证据的;(3)短暂交换早于强有力的正式治理;(4)正式治理的制度强度的增加与短暂交换的减少有关。我们认为,这种贸易网络中的短暂交换是由工厂制度强加给贸易商的一种互动模式所鼓励的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Employer Branding and it's impact on Employee Retention in Pharmaceutical Industry of Gujarat Networks, Institutions, and Encounters: Information Exchange in Early-Modern Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1