The Cartel

R. Crepeau
{"title":"The Cartel","authors":"R. Crepeau","doi":"10.5622/illinois/9780252043581.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The NFL is a cartel and has been able to use that power reality in a number of ways to enhance its economic success and in turn increase its power. The Stadium Game comes in many forms but essentially involves using promises and extortion to get new stadiums for its franchises. Expansion is another element in the process. Movement of franchises was restricted until Al Davis and the Los Angeles Municipal Coliseum Commission won their court case to move the Raiders to Los Angeles. There also were struggles over ownership rules pitting Edward Bennett Williams of Washington against the Commissioner. The argument was settled in the court of appeals in NASL v. NFL. These cases opened up an era of movement that further enhanced community exploitation. Among those moving were Baltimore to Indianapolis and Cleveland to Baltimore. Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys took a different and effective route to a new stadium, while others like the Minnesota Vikings threatened movement to get a new stadium. On the other hand, Leonard Tose in Philadelphia is an example of how one could actually drive an NFL franchise to ruin while enriching oneself. These changes diminished the power of the Commissioner.","PeriodicalId":416356,"journal":{"name":"NFL Football","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NFL Football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5622/illinois/9780252043581.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The NFL is a cartel and has been able to use that power reality in a number of ways to enhance its economic success and in turn increase its power. The Stadium Game comes in many forms but essentially involves using promises and extortion to get new stadiums for its franchises. Expansion is another element in the process. Movement of franchises was restricted until Al Davis and the Los Angeles Municipal Coliseum Commission won their court case to move the Raiders to Los Angeles. There also were struggles over ownership rules pitting Edward Bennett Williams of Washington against the Commissioner. The argument was settled in the court of appeals in NASL v. NFL. These cases opened up an era of movement that further enhanced community exploitation. Among those moving were Baltimore to Indianapolis and Cleveland to Baltimore. Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys took a different and effective route to a new stadium, while others like the Minnesota Vikings threatened movement to get a new stadium. On the other hand, Leonard Tose in Philadelphia is an example of how one could actually drive an NFL franchise to ruin while enriching oneself. These changes diminished the power of the Commissioner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧佩克
美国国家橄榄球联盟是一个卡特尔,并且能够通过多种方式利用这种权力现实来提高其经济上的成功,从而增加其权力。体育场游戏有多种形式,但本质上包括使用承诺和勒索来为其特许经营获得新的体育场。扩张是这个过程中的另一个因素。在艾尔·戴维斯和洛杉矶市政体育馆委员会赢得将突袭者队迁往洛杉矶的官司之前,特许经营权的流动一直受到限制。华盛顿的爱德华·贝内特·威廉姆斯(Edward Bennett Williams)与专员之间也存在所有权规则方面的斗争。这一争论在NASL诉NFL的上诉法院得到了解决。这些案件开启了一个运动时代,进一步加强了社区剥削。其中包括巴尔的摩搬到印第安纳波利斯,克利夫兰搬到巴尔的摩。杰里·琼斯(Jerry Jones)和达拉斯牛仔队(Dallas Cowboys)采取了一种不同的、有效的方式来建造新体育场,而明尼苏达维京人队(Minnesota viking)等其他球队则威胁要采取行动来建造新体育场。另一方面,费城的伦纳德·托尔(Leonard Tose)是一个例子,说明了一个人如何在让自己富裕的同时,推动NFL球队走向毁灭。这些变化削弱了专员的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Labor Conflict The Perfect Television Game Acknowledgments Super Sunday APPENDIX A:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1