Differences between genders in anaerobic capacity during a supramaximal effort

Rodrigo A. B. de Poli, J. González, N. Fonsati, A. Zagatto
{"title":"Differences between genders in anaerobic capacity during a supramaximal effort","authors":"Rodrigo A. B. de Poli, J. González, N. Fonsati, A. Zagatto","doi":"10.1590/s1980-6574201900030018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"–– Aim: The present study aimed to verify if there is a difference between genders in anaerobic capacity estimated by energetic equivalents of glycolytic and phosphagen pathways (AC [La-]+EPOCfast ). Methods: In this way, 8 men and 8 women (physical education students) were subjected to the following sequence of tests: session 1) graded exercise test to measure the maximal oxygen consumption (V ֽ O 2max ) and intensity associated with V ֽ O 2max (iV ֽ O 2max ); sessions 2 to 3) familiarization with supramaximal effort at 115% of iV ֽ O 2max ; session 4) supramaximal effort at 115% of iV ֽ O 2max to measure AC [La-]+EPOCfast . Results: The AC [La-]+EPOCfast was lower in women compared to men when expressed in absolute and relative values (-38.11%; p =0.01 and -25.71%; p =0.03, respectively). A non-significant difference was observed in performance in the supramaximal effort (-12.08%; p =0.15), besides which, a likely negative inference was observed when comparing women to men. In addition, energetic equivalents of the glycolytic pathway (e[La - ]) were also lower in women when expressed in relative and absolute values (-47.01%; p =0.001 and -36.71%; p =0.001, respectively), however no statistical difference was found for energetic equivalents of the phosphagen pathway (ePCr) ( p >0.05). Conclusion: The AC [La-]+EPOCfast is lower in women compared to men, mainly due to","PeriodicalId":153884,"journal":{"name":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574201900030018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

–– Aim: The present study aimed to verify if there is a difference between genders in anaerobic capacity estimated by energetic equivalents of glycolytic and phosphagen pathways (AC [La-]+EPOCfast ). Methods: In this way, 8 men and 8 women (physical education students) were subjected to the following sequence of tests: session 1) graded exercise test to measure the maximal oxygen consumption (V ֽ O 2max ) and intensity associated with V ֽ O 2max (iV ֽ O 2max ); sessions 2 to 3) familiarization with supramaximal effort at 115% of iV ֽ O 2max ; session 4) supramaximal effort at 115% of iV ֽ O 2max to measure AC [La-]+EPOCfast . Results: The AC [La-]+EPOCfast was lower in women compared to men when expressed in absolute and relative values (-38.11%; p =0.01 and -25.71%; p =0.03, respectively). A non-significant difference was observed in performance in the supramaximal effort (-12.08%; p =0.15), besides which, a likely negative inference was observed when comparing women to men. In addition, energetic equivalents of the glycolytic pathway (e[La - ]) were also lower in women when expressed in relative and absolute values (-47.01%; p =0.001 and -36.71%; p =0.001, respectively), however no statistical difference was found for energetic equivalents of the phosphagen pathway (ePCr) ( p >0.05). Conclusion: The AC [La-]+EPOCfast is lower in women compared to men, mainly due to
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在最大努力过程中无氧能力的性别差异
目的:本研究旨在验证通过糖酵解和磷酸途径(AC [La-]+EPOCfast)的能量当量估计的厌氧能力是否存在性别差异。方法:以这种方式,8名男性和8名女性(体育专业学生)进行以下顺序的测试:阶段1)分级运动测试,测量最大耗氧量(V O 2max)和与V O 2max相关的强度(iV O 2max);第2至3次训练)以115%的静脉训练强度( 2max)熟悉最大训练强度;会话4)以115%的静脉 O 2max的最大努力来测量AC [La-]+EPOCfast。结果:AC [La-]+EPOCfast在女性中的绝对值和相对值均低于男性(-38.11%;P =0.01和-25.71%;P =0.03)。在最大努力方面的表现差异不显著(-12.08%;P =0.15),除此之外,当比较女性和男性时,观察到可能的负面推断。此外,糖酵解途径的能量当量(e[La -])在女性中的相对和绝对值也较低(-47.01%;P =0.001和-36.71%;p =0.001),但在能量等效的磷酸途径(ePCr)中没有发现统计学差异(p >0.05)。结论:AC [La-]+EPOCfast在女性中较男性低,主要是由于
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The experience of athletes with disabilities in mainstream sports: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor for assessing cardiac autonomic control in individuals with spinal cord injury Normative values of handgrip strength in adolescents according to chronological age and sexual maturation Physiological and technical demands of the small-sided and generic games in female futsal players Monitoring of overtraining and motivation in elite soccer players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1